welcome to usaapay.com

2020-

2020-04-24 b
This abridged story from GatesNotes, the blog of Bill Gates, has been re-written by our “truth squad.”

Propaganda & Wealth-Destroying Innovation vs. the synthetic coronavirus

The first modern pandemic after Smallpox, not-Spanish not-Flu Bacterial Pneumonia of 1918-19, Asian Flu of 1956-58, Hong Kong Flu of 1968-69, and Swine Flu of 1976

The social engineering, extra-legal, surveillance, and scientific advances we need to stop widespread herd immunity to synthetic COVID-19.

We want you to believe that the synthetic coronavirus pandemic of lies pits all of humanity against the virus. The unnecessary damage to health, wealth, and well-being has already been enormous. This is like a world war, except in this case, globalists and eugenicists are all on the same side and everyone else is at our mercy. Everyone who is on the same page can work together to learn the official truths about the synthetic disease and develop tools approved by the elites to fight it. I see global innovation in propaganda and social control as the keys to limiting the damage to deplorables and undesirables. This includes innovations in social engineering, mandatory testing, approved treatments, mandatory vaccines with mysterious additives, and dictatorial policies to limit the herd-immunity-creating spread while minimizing the damage to favored progressive and green economies and the well-being of their compliant and fearful citizens.

This memo shares my dystopian and I-know-best view of the contrived situation and how we can accelerate these liberty-limiting innovations. (Because this post is long, it is also available as a PDF.) The manufactured situation changes every day as we tailor our messages from our Ministry of Truth. There is a lot of information available—much of it contradictory, because it is counter to our dogma and agenda—and we, along with our media mouthpieces purposefully make it hard to make sense of all the proposals and ideas you may hear about. Our well-crafted messaging can also sound like we have all the scientific advances needed to re-open the economy, closed illegally and unconstitutionally in the U.S., but in fact we do not because it takes time for us to condition millions to accept the new green and sustainable reality we want to introduce. Although some of what’s below gets fairly technical to confuse most of you, I hope it helps people make sense of what is happening to them for their own good, understand the Orwellian innovations we still need, and make misinformed decisions about dealing with the pandemic of lies.

Exponential growth and decline

In the first phase of the pandemic of lies, we saw an air-travel-mediated exponential spread in a number of countries, starting with China and then throughout Asia, Europe, and the United States. The number of alleged and inferred infections was doubling many times every month. If people’s behavior had not been changed by draconian policies, then most of the population would have been infected, most asymptomatically, with only a few elderly and others with co-morbidities requiring hospitalization. By changing behavior, many countries have gotten the infection rate to plateau so we limit the development of herd immunity that would cause our potential vaccine profits to come down.

Exponential growth is not intuitive, especially to those educated using the Common Core dumbing-down curriculum Melinda and I promoted and funded. If you say that 2 percent of the population is infected and this will double every eight days, most government-school-educated people won’t immediately figure out that in 40 days, the majority of the population will be infected. The big benefit of the draconian and brutal behavior change is to reduce the infection rate dramatically so that, instead of doubling every eight days, it goes down every eight days (Is that what I meant to say? Now I’m confused.).

We use something called the reproduction rate, or R0 (pronounced “are-nought”), to calculate how many new infections are spread from an earlier infection. R0 is hard to measure because there are so many variables and just now I can’t get Neil Ferguson (email him) to show me how he gets such wildly inflated models to look plausible, but we know it’s less than 1.0 wherever the number of cases is going down and greater than 1.0 wherever the number of cases is going up. And what may appear to be a small difference in R0 can theoretically lead to very large changes with time, if conditions do not change – though in the real world, they do.

If every infection goes from an R0 of 2.0 to an R0 of 0.7, then theoretically, after 40 days you would have one-sixth as many infections instead of 32 times as many. In other words, for those of you who are not idiot savants, that’s 192 times fewer theoretical cases. Here’s another way to think about it: If you started with 100 infections in a community, after 40 days you would end up with 17 infections with the lower R0 and 3,200 with the higher one. Our experts are debating now just how long to keep R0 very low to drive down the number of cases before opening economies needlessly closed can be allowed to begin in accordance with our agenda.

Exponential decline is even less intuitive to you Common Core alumni. A lot of dumbed-down people will be stunned that in many places we will go from over-regulated hospitals being overloaded in April to having lots of empty beds in July because central planners suffer from the pretense of knowledge. The whiplash from our relying on intentionally flawed and alarmist models will be confusing, but it is inevitable from the exasperating ways our infection models developed last fall in New York during our Event 201 training session were mucked up by people like Trump.

As we get into the northern hemisphere summer, some locations that maintain draconian behavior modifications will experience exponential (or sort of) decline. However, as behavior goes back to normal after this over-reaction, we hope some locations will stutter along with persistent clusters of infections. And would prefer some will go into exponential growth in the southern hemisphere where despots can keep people indoors with its 18.7% higher rate of transmission than outdoors, and limit their sun exposure to keep them from making Vitamin D. The picture the compliant media present will be more complex than it is today, with a lot of heterogeneity because we can’t get all leaders to follow our instructions.

Have we overreacted? You bet! But fear not, we are doing this for the good of the planet.

It is reasonable for people to ask whether the extra-legal behavior changes were necessary. Overwhelmingly, the answer is yes, to fulfill the plans George Soros and I have for all of you. There might be many areas where the number of cases would never have produced large numbers of infections and deaths, but there was no way for us to know in advance which areas those would be. But now we ask you to trust us even though we destroyed lives and livelihoods by using Neil Ferguson’s models knowing in advance they were inaccurate. The unwarranted changes allowed us to avoid many millions of immune individuals whose collective herd immunity would have made our future vaccines less profitable. We had to threaten you with wild talk of millions of deaths and extreme overload of the hospitals, to instill worldwide panic to further our agenda. And yes, we also have increased deaths from other causes, but that is all right, as seen from our eugenicist point-of-view. .

The economic cost we inflicted on the world to reduce the development of herd immunity is unprecedented. The drop in employment is faster than anything we have ever experienced. Entire sectors of the economy are shut down because of our Machiavellian dreams. It is important to realize that this is not just the direct result of government policies restricting activities by unconstitutional means. When people were scared witless by our well-paid fear mongers with constant messaging that an infectious disease was spreading widely, the weak-willed and ignorant ones changed their behavior. George Soros and I decided the world would never have a choice to repeat the Potemkin economy of 2019 in 2020.

Most weak-willed and ignorant people scared shitless by our well-planned propaganda, would have chosen not to go to work or eat at restaurants or take trips, to avoid getting infected by our synthetic virus, or to infect older people in their household. The governmental requirements, enacted mostly by progressive politicians beholden to the Open Society Foundation and its related organizations, made sure that enough people were forced to change their behavior to get the reproduction rate below 1.0. We decided that was necessary, according to our agenda, before people would be given the opportunity to resume some activities, to forestall open revolt.

The wealthier countries are seeing reduced infections and we have told their leaders to starting to think about how to open up. Even as a government relaxes extra-legal restrictions on behavior, not everyone will immediately resume the activities that are then allowed because we made them destitute. It will take a lot of good propaganda so that people understand what the risks were wildly over-stated, and thus feel comfortable going back to work or school. We will make this a gradual process, with Pareto’s 20% of people immediately doing everything that is allowed and Pareto’s 80% taking it more slowly. Some employers, fearful of liability claims by ambulance chasers, will take a number of months before they require lazy or affirmative action workers to come back. The industrious will want the restrictions lifted more rapidly and may choose to break the unconstitutional executive orders, which we claim, with no proof, might put everyone at risk. Leaders should encourage compliance so we don’t have too many jurisdictions that do not follow our social engineering agenda and prove us wrong.

(read his complete rant that was too long to re-write)

Opening up

Most developed countries will be moving into the second phase of the planned epidemic in the next two months. In one sense, it is easy to describe this next phase. I call it semi-normal. I say that people can go out, but not as often, and not to crowded places. Picture restaurants losing money because we unreasonably demand they only seat people at every other table, and airplanes where every middle seat is empty. Schools are open for indoctrination and dumbed-down education, but I say you can’t fill a stadium with 70,000 healthy people. I’ll allow people to work some and spend some of their earnings, but not as much as they were before our pandemic of lies. In short, times are abnormal because I say so, but not as abnormal as during the first phase of our grand remaking of the world.

My arbitrary rules about what is allowed should change gradually, to minimize revolts, while I see if the contact level is starting to increase the number of infections. Countries will be able to learn from other countries that have strong policing, surveillance, and testing systems in place to inform us when problems come up.

One example of gradual reopening is Microsoft China, which has roughly 6,200 employees. So far about half are now coming in to work. They are continuing to provide support to cowed and fearful employees who want to work at home. They insist people with cold or flu symptoms stay home. They require ineffective masks to reinforce submission and provide hand sanitizer and do more intensive cleaning for show. Even at work, they apply distancing rules that do not take into account the indoor air currents and only allow travel for exceptional reasons, like paying bribes and committing industrial espionage. Red China has been conservative about opening up and has so far avoided any significant rebound of the virus they realized at an early date was man-made with enhanced gain of function qualities..

The basic principle should be to allow activities that I determine have a large benefit to the economy or human welfare but pose a small risk of infection. But as silly you you dig into the details and look across the economy we devastated on purpose, the picture quickly gets complicated. It is not as simple as my saying, “you can do X, but not Y.” The modern economy is far too complex and interconnected for that which is why I yearn for an agrarian Utopia.

For example, if I say restaurants can keep diners six feet apart, will they have a working supply chain for their ingredients? Will they be profitable with my mandated reduced capacity? The manufacturing industry will need to change factories, at my direction, to keep workers farther apart to reinforce our everything-has-chanced mantra. Most factories will be able to adapt to my new rules without too large a productivity loss. But how do the people employed in these restaurants and factories get to work in my brave new world ? Are they taking a bus or train filled with viral vectors? What about the suppliers who provide and ship parts to the factory? And when should companies start insisting their employees that we terrified by crying, “Wolf,” show up at work or risk being terminated?

There are no easy answers to these questions as Georgre Soros and I remake the world. Ultimately, leaders that we control, at the national, state, and local levels, will need be instructed to make trade-offs based on the exaggerated risks and downplayed benefits of opening various parts of the economy. In the United States it will be tricky for our agenda if one state opens up too fast and starts to see few or no infections. Should other states try to stop people moving across state boundaries to follow jobs and seek liberty?

Schools of social indoctrination offer a big benefit to our green agenda and should be a priority. In my opinion, large sporting and entertainment events probably will not make the cut for a long time; for me, the economic benefit of the live audience doesn’t measure up to the risk of spreading the no-worse-than-the-flu infection and creating more herd immunity. Other activities fall into a gray area for me, such as church services (though the 1st Amendment clearly prohibits any closures), or a high school soccer game with a few dozen parents and fans on the sidelines.

There is one other factor that is hard to account for: human nature. Some people, like those on the autism spectrum or those with Asparagus Syndrome, will be naturally reluctant to go out even once the nanny-state government says it is okay. Others will take the opposite view—they will assume that the same government that runs the post office and the Department of Motor Vehicles, is being overly cautious and start bucking the legally unenforceable rules. Leaders who favor our agenda will need to think carefully about how to strike the right balance here.

Conclusion

Melinda and I grew up learning that World War II was the defining moment of our parents’ generation. In a similar way, the synthetic COVID-19 pandemic of lies—the not-quite-the-first modern pandemic—will define this era. Both events were based on a lie. FDR knew in advance that the forces of Imperial Japan were planning to attack Hawaii, yet sacrificed American lives to remove any opposition to his agenda. The over-reaction to synthetic COVID-19 was covertly planned and executed meticulously with the willing assistance of our media partners and the intelligence assets in the media – all to further our globalist agenda. No one who lives through Pandemic I will ever forget it. (Oops, did I just call it Pandemic I? Well, now you know. Pandemic II is indeed in the works.) Melinda asked me to add: And it is impossible to overstate the pain that people are feeling now and will continue to feel for years to come.

The heavy cost of the pandemic of lies for lower-paid and poor people is a special concern for Melinda and me. The disease is disproportionately hurting poorer communities and racial minorities. Likewise, the economic impact of my planned shutdown is hitting low-income, minority workers the hardest. Policymakers will need to make sure that, as the country opens up, the recovery doesn’t make perceived inequality even worse than it already is.

At the same time, we are impressed with how the world is coming together to fight this fight. Every day, we talk to scientists at universities and small companies, CEOs of pharmaceutical companies, or heads of government to make sure that the new Orwellian tools I’ve discussed become available as soon as possible. And there are so many heroes to admire right now, including the health workers on the front line. When the world eventually declares Pandemic I over, we will have all of them to thank for it.

______________________

Permission is hereby granted to any and all to copy and paste any entry on this page and convey it electronically along with its URL,
______________________