content for usaapay.com courtesy of thenotimes.com
WELCOME

spread the word
.


The No Times
comments, ephemera, speculation, etc.
(protected political speech and personal opinion)

- If this is your 1st visit to this page, please start at the bottom -


2022-



Throughout July, USAAPAY.com will celebrate white people - including their history, their accomplishments and future.

white boy
Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so large as to be almost inexpressible. It’s Western exploration, science, and conquest that have revealed the world to itself.


Other races feel like subjects of Western power long after colonialism, imperialism, and slavery have disappeared.

The charge of racism puzzles whites who feel not hostility, but only baffled good will, because they don’t grasp what it really means: humiliation.

The white man presents an image of superiority even when he isn’t conscious of it.

And, superiority excites envy.

Destroying white civilization is the inmost desire of the league of designated victims we call minorities.

— Joseph Sobran, April, 1997 (originally posted as 2021-04-16 d)




2022-07-04 a
INDEPENDENCE DAY

While we celebrate Independence, the illegitimate
Biden regime does everything possible to
increase dependence.


Why We Celebrate The Fourth of July

The colonies had been in conflict with England for over a year in June of 1776. A Continental Congress convened in Philadelphia on June 7 of that year. Richard Henry Lee from Virginia offered up a resolution with these now famous words:

“Resolved: That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States, that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved.”

Lee’s words spurred the drafting of the Declaration of Independence. A committee of five was appointed to draft a statement making the case for the colonies, a statement to the world of the intent and the reason behind that intent.

Members of the Committee were John Adams of Massachusetts, Roger Sherman of Connecticut, Benjamin Franklin of Pennsylvania, Robert R. Livingston of New York and Thomas Jefferson of Virginia. Jefferson took on the task of actually drafting the document as we know it today.

The Continental Congress reconvened on July 1, 1776, and on the following day, the resolution for independence by Lee was adopted by 12 of the 13 colonies, with New York not voting. Minor changes were made to the Jefferson document.

Work on the document continued through July 3 and into the afternoon of July 4, when the Declaration was officially adopted by the Congress. Of the 13 colonies, nine voted in favor of the Declaration, two — Pennsylvania and South Carolina — voted No, Delaware was undecided and New York again abstained.

As we all know, John Hancock, President of the Congress made his signature large enough for King George to read “without his spectacles.” (read more)

2022-07-03 i
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION IX

HAPPY JULY 4th WEEKEND

While I live, let me have a country, a free country.

– John Adams

2022-07-03 h
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION VIII

Covid-Con & Lethal Injection Updates

Sars-Cov-2 Kills T-Cells, Just Like HIV
It also works like HIV, via LFA-1 T-cell Receptors and gp120

*
AIDS-Like "Chronic Covid" is Taking Over Europe, Australia and NZ
The Boosted Cannot Clear Covid Easily and Keep Getting Reinfected

*

*
Vaccine Shedding Finally Proven!
Statistically Significant Vaccine Shedding from Parents to Children

*

*


2022-07-03 g
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION VII

Here’s a little factoid: the recent Virginia gubernatorial election went against the democrats because 80% of the poll watcher positions available for Republicans were filled, as opposed to the 15% of them who signed on for the 2020 general election.

Vote fraud is behind every Democrat win in state and national elections. When the Democrats steal an election, it’s because their opponents aren’t watching them closely enough.

— Ed D (source)


*
Great exposé on the meeting and plotting of the scoundrels that are planning to steal the midterm elections.

The one thing that should tip off people about the Dems’ confidence in their ability to cheat and their confidence that nobody will see legal consequences, is that Biden and other Dems are so flippant about the destruction they have caused, and will continue to cause, especially with the high gas prices.

Normally when a politician’s or a party’s negatives and “country on the wrong track” numbers turn out badly, they act contrite, try to make up for the mistake, and correct things some. They fear the retribution at the ballot box in the next election…”the populous are pissed off and are going to stick it to us, we need to adjust this policy, retract that one policy, etc.”

However Dems aren’t doing that, and as you’ve pointed out, are doubling down, basically telling the tens of millions complaining people to shove it, that high gas prices, high food prices, food shortages here and there are the new norm, Dems are fine with that, and aren’t going to do anything to remedy these items.

The only reason they are taking that attitude is that they are supremely confident in their ability to cheat  when it comes to voting. They do not fear retribution at the ballot box because they have neutered the population’s ability to bring that retribution. We saw it in 2020 and I think it is going to happen in a way in 2022 that will shock people because no President has had as low favorable ratings as Biden, and no “country on the wrong track” number has ever been so high. Common sense says that the party in power with those two negative factors in place, should get wiped out in the elections. But that won’t happen and while I hope that I am wrong, I fear that 2022 will be an epiphany for the population in a bad way.

That AP story from a couple of weeks ago where they projected Dems to hold the House and pick up four Senate seats is some early gaslighting/conditioning that reveals their hand.

The Fix Is In – Democrats Start to Prep America for Their Mid-Term Steal

More of this type talk will occur over subsequent months and so when the steal happens, the mainstream media will just refer back to these articles as “Well, things turned out like what was predicted for months. No surprise or shock here. Dems keep the House and increase their seats in the Senate.”

One of the common themes in Democrat policies, or in general their mindset, is that they and their constituents don’t expect to suffer negative consequences like they naturally should, from their bad/wrong/irresponsible behavior. Their whole M.O. is to rig a system, be it judicial, academic, voting, etc. for their benefit.

Abortion is one example (irresponsible behavior leads to unwanted child, abortion makes the “problem” go away). Alec Baldwin is an example (kills someone, albeit accidentally, but still expects to receive no jail time, no penalties, no nothing). Sussman, Strzok, Clinesmith, etc. (all are part of a coup plot against the sitting president and all are walking free). Youth in our inner cities in large numbers don’t academically excel (they still get waved into Harvard or onto the next grade, etc.). Criminals and illegals in large numbers commit crimes (they get waved out of jail). None of the aforementioned suffered negative consequences like they naturally should have.

Now we see it with the Dem President and Dem Congress…they burn down the country, but have voting rigged so that they won’t get thrown out of office en masse like they should. The 2022 vote will be very telling about where our country stands. (source)

2022-07-03 f
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION VI

Federal Behemoth Has Been Restrained
Unelected bureaucrats cannot put us in the dark
nor freeze us in winter nor broil us in summer.



WEST VIRGINIA et al. v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al.


https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1530_n758.pdf

Finally, the Court has no occasion to decide whether the statutory phrase “system of emission reduction” refers exclusively to measures that improve the pollution performance of individual sources, such that all other actions are ineligible to qualify as the BSER. It is pertinent to the Court’s analysis that EPA has acted consistent with such a limitation for four decades. But the only question before the Court is more narrow: whether the “best system of emission reduction” identified by EPA in the Clean Powe r Plan was within the authority granted to the Agency in Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. For the reasons given, the answer is no.
[...]
Capping carbon dioxide emissions at a level that will force a nationwide transition away from the use of coal to generate electricity may be a sensible “solution to the crisis of the day.” New York v. United States, 505 U. S. 144, 187 (1992). But it is not plausible that Congress gave EPA the authority to adopt on its own such a regulatory scheme in Section 111(d). A decision of such magnitude and consequence rests with Congress itself, or an agency acting pursuant to a clear delegation from that representative body. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is reversed, and the cases are remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion
It is so ordered.

2022-07-03 e
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION V

“I will not go gently into that bloody collectivist good night. Indeed, we will make with our defiance such a sound as ALL history from that day forward will be forced to note, even if they despise us, in the writing of it.”

— Sundance


2022-07-03 d
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION IV

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INSURRECTION was busy
wreaking havoc and framing Trump supporters.



2022-07-03 c
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION III

My message to the pretend President:
Remove your sanctions on Russian oil and gas.
Your and Obama's State Dept. and spooks provoked Russia constantly since 2014.
Russia finally responded to your murderous provocations.
You Democrats are responsible for the war & inflation.



* *
*
*

2022-07-03 b
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION II

The Alzheimer in Chief Changed His Mind

“Life begins at conception.”

— Joe Biden, 2012


2022-07-03 a
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION I

War is not the glorious romp it used to be, either, in the days of caparisoned hussars and grenadiers in colorful enfilade. Now it’s more like being a swarm of gnats in a bug-zapper: pfffftttt… and you’re just one of ten thousand fellow gnats parlayed into the plane of ignominious nonexistence, sans accolades and salutes. Thus, our supremely stupid campaign against Russia in Ukraine, which is so not going well that it is hard to find a comparable strategic fiasco in history.

Of course, strategic fiascos are “Joe Biden’s” specialty. Even his former running mate, Mr. O, acknowledged that “you can’t overestimate [“JB’s”] ability to fuck things up.” The alleged current president wanted desperately to bog down his nemesis, Vlad Putin, in the Ukrainian buzzard flats, hoping that Russia would roll over and die. But, lo and behold, it’s not working, not even with that $50-billion “JB” supposedly wired to Kiev. Instead, it’s America and our NATO allies who are circling the drain. Remember all those humming factories we won the Second World War with? They don’t exist anymore. Try prosecuting an industrial war without any industry. Decreasingly, too, our oil production, thanks explicitly to “Joe Biden’s” policies. Next, he’ll beg Mr. Putin for a discount on Russian oil while threatening to punch him in the face. I hope you’re prepared to lose this one as badly as we lost Afghanistan.

Life for us will get simpler, for sure, but it doesn’t have to be a trip back to the eleventh century. Mere months remain before the Party of Chaos has its near-death experience at the polls and we can begin to contemplate a change of course that allows us to remain a civilized nation of law and liberty, despite all the damage done. I’m celebrating this Fourth of July by mindfully declaring the independence of the country I love from the regime of grifters, tyrants, and sadists temporarily occupying the power centers of Washington, DC. I hope you will join me and do likewise. (source)

2022-07-02 f
THE RISIBLE STUFF

The Globalist Bolsheviks Are Wrong.
The Climate Cult Is a Bad Joke.
Carbon Dioxide Has No Measurable Effect on Earth's Climate.

There Isn't Enough of It to Make a Difference.

At an estimated 420 parts per million of our atmosphere, CO2 constitutes 1/25th of 1% of the atmosphere.

That's right, one twenty-fifth of one percent.

If you follow the science, specifically the Laws of Thermodynamics, you would know there is not enough CO2 to have a measurable impact on climate.

I wrote this in February, 2021:

Strictly speaking, I am neither a climate denier nor a climate change denier. Every planet with an atmosphere has a climate. And the climate of this planet does indeed change: sometimes cyclically, usually gradually, but sometimes cataclysmically. I mean what I say and say what I mean. Unlike the algoreans, warmists, Green New Deal Marxists and their media stenographers, I use words precisely.

Any compendium of modern pieties must include the unquestioned and unquestioning belief in Global Warming specifically or Climate Change in general. Faith, not facts, guide the pious. They have heard the green catechism since kindergarten. The strength of their beliefs would make a Calvinist jealous. Consequently, both believers or agnostics of that dogma show little interest in knowing its origins or underpinings. They treat it like holy writ and do not tolerate heretics or doubters. It is, as they claim, settled science. But is any science ever settled? Can we know everything about a subject of scientific inquiry and be dogmatically certain no new facts will be uncovered by further research?

The pious faithful of the settled science cult suffer from the "Semmelweis reflex" or "Semmelweis effect."  They tend to reject any new evidence or new knowledge that contradicts their established beliefs or paradigms. Timothy Leary, the LSD researcher, gave us a good definition of the Semmelweis reflex: "Mob behavior found among primates and larval hominids on undeveloped planets, in which a discovery of important scientific fact is punished.".

For me, socialist economist Robert Heilbroner was the founding father of the modern climate cult. His article, After Communism, The New Yorker, Reflections, 10 September 1990, page 91, was his attempt to restore, “the honorable title of socialism,” after the collapse of the Soviet Union. He envisioned socialism being reborn by destroying capitalism and restoring central planning to mitigate, “the ecological burden that economic growth is placing on the environment.” Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates must have clipped that article and filed it away. Heilbroner stated, “Capitalism must be monitored, regulated, and contained to such a degree that it would be difficult to call the final order capitalism.”  Are the Covid-Con and the proposed (but doomed to fail) Great Reset the result of Heilbronner's manifesto?

The pious faithful of the settled science cult also suffer from a misplaced belief in consensus. Just as might does not make right, consensus does not make anything right. Science is not decided by majority vote. Anyway, the fiction of consensus in climate "science" dates to a paper by Peter Doran and Maggie Kendall Zimmerman of the University of Illinois. They reported the skewed results of an opinion poll of climate scientists that Ms. Zimmerman had done for her MSc thesis. They concluded that 97% of climatologists thought that mankind was having a significant impact on the climate. Though the survey was sent to over 10,000 scientists, only 79 responses were received from climatologists. The vaunted 97% figure represented just 75 out of 77 scientists. "Many participants were appalled by the survey and recorded their feelings at the time, calling it simplistic and biased, and suggesting that it was an attempt to provide support for a predetermined view."

Though the mainstream media insist otherwise, there is no consensus. See also these old links:

http://business.financialpost.com/fp-comment/meaningless-consensus-on-climate-change

http://opinion.financialpost.com/2011/01/03/lawrence-solomon-97-cooked-stats/

http://climatequotes.com/2011/02/10/study-claiming-97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-flawed/

http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2014/05/the-phony-claim-that-97-of-scientists.html

http://www.garnautreview.org.au/update-2011/commissioned-work/the-%e2%80%99scientigic-consensus-on-climate-change%e2%80%99.pdf

http://sppiblog.org/news/the-97-consensus-is-only-75-self-selected-climatologists

http://tinyurl.com/Clim97pct

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/18/what-else-did-the-97-of-scientists-say/

http://www.wendymcelroy.com/news.php?extend.3684

2022-07-02 e
THE RIPE STUFF

We Are Ripe for Revolution.
Obama/Biden Bolsheviks Will Lose.


Neil Oliver Will Not Eat the Bugs

This week Neil Oliver talks about the new Utopia we are being instructed to accept.  A world in which there are no rights, only permissions.

Everything including the modification of diets and the eating of bugs and fake meat; to the type of carbon footprint home we are permitted, to the energy we may use or the acceptable car we must drive; permissions, assuming of course, our social media profile and accompanying score is in line with regulatory inspection.

Nope.  Not happening.  There are more of us than them.  We will not eat the bugs.  WATCH.

[Transcript] – What’s being done to us, or tried on us at least, isn’t working … and it isn’t working and won’t work because what we’re being pushed to accept as the new world makes no sense. The supposed utopia we’re being promised – or, rather, having rammed down our throats – is one in which there is no universal truth, no absolute and trusted truth, but only personal truth that trumps all else.

There are to be no facts like those observed by biologists, just as a for instance, and only feelings based on personal preferences that change from day to day. It will be a world in which we might have no inalienable rights, rights we are born with – just permissions granted one by one by the state … and then only if we do as we are told and do without cars and warm homes and eat our bugs and fake meat and take our medicine on demand. It is a world in which 2+2 might equal 5 if some faceless, unelected bureaucrat says it does – and if any of us says no, 2+2 always and only equals 4, then our bank accounts won’t give us any money until we accept our arithmetical and moral error.

It is a world that makes no sense and that will not work, not for the likes of you and me. It will benefit the few, but it won’t work for the billions.

In the world of before some of us had tried to learn to treat our fellow citizens as equals, and to judge them only by the content of their characters. In the new world we are to be born stamped and cursed with the sins of our ancestors or burdened with the yoke of oppression that was borne on the shoulders of those that went before. And above all else, we are absolutely to judge, and be judged, by the colour of our skins.

This judging of a person by the colour of his or her skin is a glaring example of an idea that makes no sense and does not work.

The trail to the new world is being blazed by those who call themselves progressive. Among much else, progressives say they hate racism and that it is the duty of all of us to be actively anti-racist. Progressives say we must teach our youngest about white privilege, introduce critical race theory to the classroom.

But as soon as the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade and put the individual states of America in control of laws on abortion, the progressive racist knives on the Left were out for a black judge named Clarence Thomas, one of the majority that struck down the 1973 ruling.

Thomas – only the second African American person to sit on the Supreme Court, and having occupied a place there since 1991 is, in the eyes of many who count themselves progressive, evidently the wrong sort of black man.

As a black African American, he ought, the progressives thought, to have belonged to them, and so done their bidding promptly and without hesitation. Justice Clarence Thomas however, had his own mind and made his own decision – which was not the one they wanted him to make.

All at once the N-word was back and being thrown in his face. On social media he was described, among other things, as just another dumb, field … I leave you to fill in the blank, starting with the letter N. He was called a … slave – again with the N-word as a prefix – an N-word slave to his white wife, who was called a nutcase, just for good measure. We might just cut to the chase and say Justice Clarence Thomas was called everything under the sun by the progressive, pro-choice/pro-abortion side of the debate.

Racism is one of the oldest sins of humankind. The N-word might be the ugliest name a human can call another human. In 20th century America the Ku Klux Klan hid their faces within white pointed hoods. In 21st century America it turns out progressive politics provide the necessary cover for naked racism.

Aside from feelings and opinions about abortion, deeply and passionately held – aside from the unforgivable return of one of the most offensive words in any language, and a slew of other racist insults too many to list – this behaviour by self-proclaimed progressives makes no sense – not least because it is simply inconsistent. It is also hypocrisy of the most obvious sort.

Let’s remember these are people who say they hate racism and racists. And yet the moment a man – a black African American man – did something they didn’t like – which is to say step out of line – the vilest manifestation of racist thinking was an instant, easy, comfortable fit in some of their mouths.

When [illegitimate] President Joe Biden felt he had to respond to news of black people thinking about voting for Donald Trump at the last election he said of them:

“You ain’t black!”

It seems that in the minds of so-called progressives, from the White House on down, black Americans are to be seen and treated as a monolithic bloc that could and should be counted on to vote as one … specifically the Democrat, leftist, woke … “right” way. In those progressive minds, any black people who do otherwise, who break step with the herd, must have something wrong with them. If thinking that all members of a racial group can be counted on to think and act as one isn’t racist to the core … then I don’t know what is to be described as racist.

Many of those same racists who pilloried a black man for thinking and acting as he saw fit were also among those demanding bodily autonomy for women in the context of abortion. Where were they when women, and men, were losing their jobs for refusing the Covid-19 [lethal] injections? Where were they when world leaders like Justin Trudeau, Emmanuel Macron, Jacinda Ardern and many others went out of their way to make life unbearable, unliveable for those millions who already understood bodily autonomy and had the courage to make it real by standing up straight and saying no to an unwanted medical procedure and damn the consequences? Where were those bodily-autonomy-demanding progressives then?

It doesn’t make sense, this proposed new world … this new world of say one thing and do another, where racists are evil incarnate until a black man thinks for himself and then quick as a flash the progressives sound like they’re looking for the bed sheets and the burning crosses.

Racism from the progressives might be the most egregious example of the new world making no sense, but it’s hardly alone.

World leaders in the west, for what they’re worth – which is absolutely nothing – are reciting from a hymn sheet, singing in perfect harmony about a world made green by ending fossil fuels.

Footage emerged this week of Canada’s PM, Blackface Trudeau, and our own Boris Johnson, laughing together at the G7 about who had arrived on the smallest jet plane.

They were laughing about their uninterrupted use of jet planes because to them the very subject is a joke. It’s a joke because for them nothing will change, while for us, the peasants, everything must change. Leaders like Trudeau and Johnson find the advent of this new reality very funny indeed, because it’s another opportunity to laugh at us – us everyday folk, fearful about feeding our families, heating our homes, ever-rising inflation, that sort of thing.

The nonsense – or rather, the absolute absence of sense – trickles down from on high and puddles around the feet of the gullible and the hypocrites.

The Glastonbury music festival was the return of the annual pilgrimage of the woke and worthy – fittingly enough, at Worthy Farm of all places. It is the gathering, all in one place, of the hundreds of thousands who think they know best and are ready and able to part with hundreds of pounds just to get beyond the high fences and onto the holy ground. Talk about no borders.

When it was all over, they left in their woke wake uncountable tons of rubbish – single use plastic among it – scattered across the fields so that the farmland looked like a pop up landfill site. Best of all, the organisers had provided chargers for electric cars. The initial price to top up a virtue vehicle was 80 pounds … dropped to a bargain low of 50 pounds after complaints. But wait … the chargers were powered by … diesel generators. There, at the heart of the high church of woke, was the very life blood of Satan himself – filthy old diesel. A statement on behalf of the festival even said that using the farm’s own diesel power had been deemed less harmful – less harmful – to the environment than installing a Tesla supercharger.

On and on it goes, the litany of the nonsensical.

We’re told to fear overpopulation – when reproduction rates throughout the West are way below the level needed even to sustain present numbers. All across the globe – from the US to Spain to here in the UK to Singapore and to Japan – population numbers are set to fall off a cliff. Who will work to earn the taxes? Who will take care of the elderly? Countless questions and not enough people demanding answers. It makes no sense.

At a time in history when we have the technology and the ability to feed all 7 billion people on the planet and more besides, we have global food shortages, the promise of famines in the Third World. We have a fuel crisis while coal, gas and oil lie untapped under the lands of the west, and while nuclear power remains pariah in the minds of those who would rather the poor got poorer, the hungry got hungrier and the cold got colder. Boris Johnson and Joe Biden find yet more billions of pounds to send to Ukraine and won’t lift a finger to do anything meaningful to help their own people face the advent of crisis and hardship.

It makes no sense. It makes no sense because, and here’s the hardest pill to swallow, it’s not supposed to make sense. This is planned. This is on purpose. It’s supposed to make us do what we’re told. It’s supposed to make us stop asking impertinent questions and just submit to The Man. It’s supposed to divide us, one from another until everyone feels alone. It’s supposed to make us scared, angry, cold, hungry and sick to death. And when enough us are scared enough, angry enough, cold enough, hungry enough and sick enough or dead … we’re expected to welcome the new world with open, spindly, incessantly jabbed arms.

But here’s the thing, my prediction is that it won’t work, this new world. It won’t work because it takes no account of the human spirit – the human spirit that learned more than two thousand years ago why totalitarianism was the enemy of freedom and life itself. That human spirit is still alive and kicking, by the millions.

I’ll tell you this much right now – I want nothing of their new world and so I’m having none of it. I know right and wrong when I see them.

I will not eat the bugs.

I’ll see you on the other side. (read more)

2022-07-02 d
THE RIDE STUFF

Russia Sanctions Blamed for DELIBERATE
Obama/Biden Green New Deal Fuel & Food Inflation
Meant to Crush the White Middle Class

*
*
*

2022
-07-02 c
THE RITE STUFF

Intolerant Religion of Affluent White Female Liberals

The Modern Democrat Voter

Rarely does an image encapsulate a moment in U.S. political history so succinctly.  This is a brilliant, absolutely brilliant, representation of a modern leftist who votes politically in favor of democrats.   This artwork is one of the best encapsulations I have seen in years.

The image is particularly poignant because modern leftists must pretend not to [notice or] know things in order to advance their political ideology.  The suburban female voter, perfectly showcased as a “Karen” type figure (and the gender shaded imagery) is a representation of a wealthy, white, female, suburban liberal who drives the overall policy direction of the toxic political left.

Karen

The artwork perfectly encapsulates the G7 policy announcement made by Joe Biden:

(1) To increase dependency and control the third-world population the G7 will finance a vaccine manufacturing facility in Senegal.  The breeding of the brown people must be controlled – climate change policy demands it. 

(2) To control the optics of the third-world complaining about it, the G7 will mobilize $335 million in private capital to control the communication systems in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.  The brown people must not discover the nature of their exploitation; and the citizens within the G7 nations must not find out their government is exploiting the brown people. Wouldn’t look good.

(3) The United States will spend $50 million over five years to support gender equity in the developing world increasing the friction between brown women and brown men, while ignoring cultural differences and forcing the social ideology of the West upon them.  And finally…. 

(4) The G7, fearing third-world instability and anger from the brown people that could disrupt their supply chains, the U.S. and Western nations will now seek to increase their control of mining for mineral deposits needed for G7 batteries – and will fund more railroads and ports to export the critical material to the West more quickly. 

[SOURCE]

The announcement is an official launch and a rebranding of what had been rolled out last year at the G7 in the UK as “Build Back Better World,” the formal instructions from the World Economic Forum surrounding [the fiction of] climate change. (read more)

2022-07-02 b
THE RIGHT STUFF

[H]uman societies are composed of contending political forces that seek power [“power bloc” or “political force”], and these forces include all groups able to organize and mobilize considerable numbers of people and resources around them. In the late Roman Empire, Christianity and (for a time) Mithraism were such forces, able to attract a large following and to compete for power in the crumbling imperial state. In other periods of history, significant political forces have mobilized around certain military technologies or forms of organization (the Greek phalanx or Roman legion, the mounted warriors and English longbows of the Middle Ages), or economic interests (industrial wealth in the early 19th century). What may be a significant political force, one able to win the support of followers and adherents and exercise power in one historical epoch or circumstance, may cease to be significant when other forces are able to resist, overcome, or replace it. Those political forces or power blocs that are most successful in mobilizing power then constitute an elite or ruling class.
{...}
The problem with this concept of conspiracy as “power bloc” or “political force” is that it tends to take all the fun out of conspiracy theory. Instead of locating villainy in a small, monolithic, invisible, and all but invincible band of plotters, it offers a sociology of elites as the main explanation of the dominant historical trends of the age. But truth, if it is less fun than fiction, is at least more useful. The power bloc model ought to dispose of several of the wackier conspiracy theories without further discussion. We are not talking about Freemasons or Illuminati or Satanists or rabbis who pore over the Talmud in a millennium-long quest to make us believe in evolution, but about which groups control the instruments of political, economic, and cultural power and how they organize and use their power.
[...]
Once Middle Americans begin to grasp the truth that it is the power structure rather than a man, a woman, or a small gang of swindlers and sex fiends that lies behind the dispossession of their country and their cultural and economic destruction, then they will begin to understand that what really goes on behind the scenes

— Sam Francis, 1996

2022-07-02 a
THE REICH STUFF
not nazi

No Really, I'm Not a Nazi ("Neo" or Otherwise)

I try to not be finicky about political labels. I’m comfortable with many of them. Race realist, white advocate, white nationalist, identitarian, and racialist are all decent descriptions of what I am. But there are two I am sometimes saddled with that I reject entirely. The first is “paleoconservative.” While I have profited enormously from reading many paleo thinkers, and enjoy Chronicles magazine, I am not one of them. A cornerstone of paleoconservatism is social conservatism in regards to the “culture war” issues of the late 1990s and early 2000s. I am not a social conservative, I’m a cosmopolitan urbanite. Moreover, the social conservatism of paleos is almost always informed by religious devotion, usually Catholicism, but sometimes other branches of Judeo-Christianity. I am not a believer in any of those religions.

But “Nazi” is the incorrect label I hear much more often. It is an even less accurate designation than paleo. Despite the mainstream media and education system’s obsession with the history of race relations in the United States, many people, strangely, seem to believe that Adolf Hitler was the first, or perhaps foremost, exponent of white racial consciousness. Nothing could be further from the truth. Hitler wasn’t a white nationalist so much as a German revanchist/chauvinist. His concept of the “Aryan” was quite different from what many American racialists throughout history, and most contemporary people, think of as “white.” The “master race” lionized by the Third Reich excluded Slavs and treated them brutally, to put it mildly.

I am a pan-Europeanist. Poles, Russians, Belarusians, Ukrainians, and all the non-Muslim and non-Gypsy peoples of the Balkans and Eastern Europe are white. Germans are not superior to them. Moreover, the indigenous peoples of the Old Continent must put aside their petty differences and historic grievances and work together against the rising tide of color crashing upon its shores. Hitler, and Nazism, are emblematic of the small-minded nationalism that has so tragically divided the white race and led to countless fratricidal wars. In this sense, I have as little use for Nazism as I do for Bonapartism. Neither France nor Germany (or any other country) have a right to conquer and kill their racial kinsmen.

Hitler also aligned with non-whites against whites. The Imperial Japan of the 1930s was one of the most ferocious and menacing non-white empires in world history. In 1941, the Japanese [were allowed to attack] America (essentially a white superpower). America immediately retaliated with a declaration of war, after which Nazi Germany declared war on the US. Nobody who aligns with Asian countries against America, or against any other white country, can be considered a white nationalist. Presumably Hitler would have been pleased to see Japan invade and colonize the western United States. As a white American, I find this unforgivable. To whatever extent Hitler aligned with Japan from fear of the USSR’s imperial designs, he should have scrapped the alliance the moment Japan failed to aid Germany during or after Operation Barbarossa.
[...]
In regards to Jews, I do not think their political power and cultural influence are above criticism. However, I have never believed that Jews are the biggest threat to Western Civilization. Historically, Islam seems to be a better candidate for that distinction. That being said, several different Asiatic powers are certainly in the running, both past (e.g. the Mongol Empire) and present (e.g. China). Right now, the biggest threat facing whites is the looming African population bomb. I’m no fan of the ADL, George Soros, Howard Zinn, or the Frankfurt school, but obsessing over Jewish malfeasance has a tendency to blind people to nuanced realities, and the existence of very real non-Semitic threats — such as the enormous amount of damage done by gentile race traitors throughout history.

Some may argue that various neo-Nazis are not guilty of the issues outlined above. Most American Nazis, it seems, don’t dislike Eastern Europeans. If that’s the case, they really shouldn’t call themselves “Nazis.” Anti-Slavism was integral to the Third Reich. Likewise, if neo-Nazis are pleased that America defeated Japan instead of vice versa, then they shouldn’t admire a man who declared war against America in defense of Japan. The racialist bonafides of neo-Nazis are often suspect in other ways. For example, George Lincoln Rockwell, the founder of the American Nazi Party, once said “I’d rather gas queers than anyone else.” That is to say, he saw heterosexual miscegenists, blacks, and non-white immigrants as a lesser problem than gays, even white ones. That puts him in the same league as those conservative evangelicals who would rather their daughters give them seven mulatto grandchildren than cohabitate with a white woman. I find that preference truly disgusting. Whatever you think of gays, they’re certainly better than miscegenists. If you disagree, you are probably more of a conservative, or reactionary, than a racialist. I am a racialist first and foremost.

On the whole, it has never been clear to me what Nazism has to offer to white Americans, past and present. As I noted in the beginning of this essay, Adolf Hitler didn’t pioneer white racial consciousness in any way. American identitarians have no shortage of domestic thinkers and politicians to draw from: Madison Grant, Lothrop Stoddard, Hinton Rowan Helper, the American Colonization Society, Pitchfork Ben Tillman, James K. Vardaman, John Muir, Jared Taylor, and David Starr Jordan — to name only a few. Much of Nazi ideology is specific not just to Germany, but to Germany in the 1930s, and has little to no relevance or applicability to the United States. Likewise, there is no shortage of European figures not bogged down by Germanic particularism or totalitarianism: Alain de Benoist, Guillaume Faye, Enoch Powell, and Pim Fortuyn to again name only a few.

So no, I am not a “Nazi” in any way. To call me one is about as accurate as calling a Bernie Sanders voter a Stalinist. In both cases, the label is used as a partisan slur that seeks to delegitimize a viewpoint out of hand. Call me a “white nationalist” instead, that term also goes a long way in isolating me from polite society, and it’s accurate to boot. (read more)

2022
-07-01 c
POOR WHITES AGAINST ADVERSITY

Grace and Grit in Southern West Virginia

[...] At the end of the week, I drive home and there’s everything to think about alone in my car for hours and hours. It’s as if I can’t even remember what I was expecting to find now that I’ve seen so much. Southern West Virginia is poor, and the stories of its heartbreak could fill the Library of Congress a hundred times over. But I knew all that before I got there— you probably did, too. However, it’s not some kind of “big White ghetto” in the midst of a Hobbesian war of all against all. I’ve really never met kinder people. I’ve also never met a people more determined to withstand it all and persevere. The place enlightened me— but only after it humbled me. All of us really do have a lot to learn from these people. Marcus Aurelius wrote that, “Nothing can happen to any man that nature has not fitted him to endure. Your neighbor’s experiences are no different from your own; yet he, being either less aware of what has happened or more eager to show his mettle, stands steady and undaunted. For shame, that ignorance and vanity should prove stronger than wisdom!” My Christian friends assure me that Christ agrees. I couldn’t tell you if God is real, but after a week in Welch, I do know for certain that God smiles upon southern West Virginia— and on the rest of us as well. (read more)

2022-07-01 b
HARRIDANS AGAINST LIFE

ABORT THE MISSION! ABORT!

I gather from the recent hysteria that the Supreme Court has just ordered all 72 million American women of childbearing age to get pregnant and carry the baby to term.

This is big news, if true. I’m not at all surprised that every female journalist, activist and politician is threatening to burn down the Supreme Court over its decision last Friday in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

On the other hand, even accepting the abortion cult’s belief that members of the weaker sex are incapable of either keeping their knees together or mastering birth control, I still only count about 100,000 women who won’t have easy access to abortion without Roe v. Wade.

According to the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute, 930,160 abortions are performed in the U.S. every year. The lion’s share of those abortions occur in states that Biden won. Sixty-eight percent of all abortions are performed in blue states and 32% in red states, according to the CDC.

Far from restricting abortion, the blue states have begun wildly expanding abortion rights in response to Dobbs — to the extent that that’s humanly possible. (Yes, it’s a beating heart, a helpless human being made in God’s image, but I’m not all that grieved about abortions in blue states.)

That means, straight out of the chute, we’re down to only 297,651 abortions per year that are even at risk of being banned after Dobbs.

Flash to thousands of screeching harridans, whose only risk of pregnancy would be if a zoologist inseminated them in a lab, holding signs that say, “GET OUT OF MY UTERUS!”

Also according to Guttmacher, 54% of all abortions already are “medication abortions,” i.e. accomplished with pills given within the first 10 weeks of pregnancy. Good luck trying to ban that: The combined power of federal law enforcement — the FBI, the DEA, Customs and Border Protection and the U.S. military — plus state law enforcement can’t even keep fentanyl out of the country.

So now, we’re down to — at most — 136,919 abortions a year that could theoretically be banned post-Dobbs.

In fact, it will be significantly fewer than that, because a lot of the red state “bans” will still permit abortion in the first trimester. Guess how many abortions take place in the first trimester? Ninety-two percent, according to the CDC. Forty-three percent occur in the first six weeks of pregnancy.

We’ve apparently already won an awful lot of “hearts and minds” on abortion – and I’m happy to explain that term to any pro-abortionists who can’t define “beating heart.”

I didn’t even mention that every abortion ban includes an exception to protect the life or (serious) health of the mother (i.e., NOT I’ll be really depressed if I can’t get this abortion). Always have, and always will. That gives the abortionist a fair bit of wiggle room.

This is the terrifying future that led thousands of abortion hobbyists to rush into the streets last week and scream at us about their uteruses. (Uteri?). All because up to 100,000 ladies won’t be able to get drive-through abortions if they have unprotected sex with men they don’t want to have children with, and they didn’t notice that they live in Louisiana.

Maybe their unaborted kids will be better at math.

The loons have also introduced a new phrase into the abortion debate (already elevated by such precise terminology as “choice”): “Abortion care.” See, if I’d been at the meeting where it was announced, OK, everybody! We’re going to start calling it “abortion care,” I’d have said, “I’m sorry, that’s too preposterous.”

Consistent with liberal psyches, the attack on the Supreme Court last week was completely schizophrenic —

Thursday: HOW DARE YOU TAKE AWAY STATES’ RIGHTS ON GUNS!

Friday: HOW DARE YOU GIVE US STATES’ RIGHTS ON ABORTION!

[ANSWER: One’s in the Constitution, and one isn’t.]

The Dobbs decision also allowed the left to imitate Joe Sobran’s joke version of a New York Times headline: Earthquake Destroys New York; Women and Minorities Hit Hardest.

In one breath, abortion enthusiasts tell us women of color will be hit hardest by the court ruling allowing states to ban abortion. That’s true in a sense: According to the latest figures from the C.D.C, in 2019, 33% percent of women seeking abortions were White, 38% Black and 21% Hispanic. Per capita, that’s a lot more Black and Latino babies being aborted than White babies.

But then in the next breath, they say opposition to abortion is rooted in White supremacy! Yes, that’s a big rallying cry at the white supremacist rallies: DON’T KILL BLACK BABIES!

As I noted after the freakout over the leaked abortion opinion a couple of months ago, no matter what people think of abortion, unleashing these shrews on the public is not helping Democrats.

Democratic consultants’ midterm strategy: More shrews!

Oh, wait — the Democrats agree with me. After allowing the ladies a three-day struggle session over the weekend, on Monday, the Jan. 6 committee suddenly announced an immediate return to the hearings. It was an emergency! They had a surprise witness. This could not wait.

MAJOR UPDATE FROM BOMBSHELL WITNESS AT TUESDAY’S HEARINGS: Trump is still a douchebag.

In three days, we went from It’s a Christian cult on the Supreme Court! My Body, My Choice! This is like slavery! to … What abortion decision? Let’s talk about Trump! (read more)

2022-07-01 a
US AGAINST THEM

Aleksandr Dugin on the Alien, Substantially Jewish Elite in the U.S. and Its War Against Traditional American Individualism

A translated version of an article by Aleksandr Dugin has appeared on KATEHON, an anti-globalist, pro-Russian website. (When I tried to post a link to the article on Twitter, they said that “the link has been identified by Twitter and its partners as harmful” and they blocked it.) Dugin’s article indicates that he has a solid grasp of politics in the U.S., and for the first time that I am aware of, he points to Jewish influence. Since Dugin is reputedly close to Vladimir Putin (“Putin’s brain” and of course, a “fascist,” as the neoliberal Washington Post phrased it) and because he has supported the Ukrainian war, it indicates that the Russian political establishment understands the upheaval going on in the United States.

Excerpts from Alexander Dugin: “The United States Court Against the Ideology of Progress.”

The fact is that there is not just one American state, but two countries and two nations with this name and this is becoming more and more evident. It is not even a question of Republicans and Democrats, whose conflict is becoming increasingly bitter. It is the fact that there is a deeper division in American society.

Half of the US population is an advocate of pragmatism. This means that for them there is only one yardstick: it works or it doesn’t work, it works/it doesn’t work. That is all. And no dogma either about the subject or the object. Everyone can see himself as whatever he wants, including Elvis Presley or Father Christmas, and if it works, no one dares to object. It is the same with the outside world: there are no inviolable laws, do what you want with the outside world, but if it responds harshly, that is your problem. There are no entities, only interactions. This is the basis of Native American identity, it is the way Americans themselves have traditionally understood liberalism: as freedom to think what you want, to believe what you want, and to behave as you want. Of course, if it comes to conflict, the freedom of one is limited by the freedom of the other, but without trying you cannot know where the fine line is. Try it, maybe it will work.

That is how American society has been up to a certain point. Here, banning abortion, allowing abortion, sex change, punishing sex change, gay parades or neo-Nazi parades were all possible, nothing was turned away at the door, the decision could be anything, and the courts, relying on a multitude of unpredictable criteria, precedents and considerations, were the last resort to decide, in problematic cases, what worked/didn’t work. This is the mysterious side of the Americans, completely misunderstood by Europeans, and also the key to their success: they have no boundaries, which means they go where they want until someone stops them, and that is exactly what works.

Dugin is describing traditional American political values based on individualism and personal freedom. But traditional American political values have been in conflict with the values of a new, substantially Jewish elite with strong authoritarian tendencies.

But in the American elite, which is made up of people from a wide variety of backgrounds, at some point a critically large number of non-Americans have accumulated. They are predominantly Europeans, often from Russia. Many are ethnically Jewish but imbued with European or Russian-Soviet principles and cultural codes. They brought a different culture and philosophy to the United States. They did not understand or accept American pragmatism at all, seeing it only as a backdrop for their own advancement. That is, they took advantage of American opportunities, but did not intend to adopt a libertarian logic unrelated to any hint of totalitarianism. In reality, it was these alien elites who hijacked the old American democracy. It was they who took the helm of globalist structures and gradually seized power in the United States.

This is exactly what we have emphasized at TOOThere are people with a variety of backgrounds that make up our new elite, but there is a substantial Jewish core with “alien” values, and in general, this elite speaks with one voice and dissent on important issues is not tolerated. This new elite largely emigrated to the United States in late nineteenth and early twentieth century, and the Marxist commitments of many of them were an important aspect of the enactment of the 1924 Immigration Restriction Act in the wake of the Bolshevik Revolution. In subsequent decades Jews became the backbone (p. 68ff) of the American Old Left and New Left. Indeed,  as noted in my review of Amy Weingarten’s Jewish Organizations’ Response to Communism and Senator McCarthy, “a major problem that the organized Jewish community was forced to confront—a problem stemming from the long involvement of the mainstream Jewish community in communism and the far left, at least until the end of World War II, and among a substantial number of Jews even after this period. … Weingarten points to a “hard core of Jews” (p. 6) who continued to support the Communist Party into the 1950s and continued to have a “decisive role” in shaping the policies of the American Communist Party (CPUSA) (p. 9). These leftist Jews were welcomed into the Jewish organizations during the early post-war, particularly the American Jewish Congress, the largest American Jewish organization, but they were gradually made unwelcome due to the anti-communist fervor of the period.

Notice that Dugin emphasizes that the new alien elite has exploited American individualism to advance these alien values—they “took advantage of American opportunities, but did not intend to adopt a libertarian logic unrelated to any hint of totalitarianism.” When they achieved power, they rejected the libertarian ethos in favor of top-down, centralized, authoritarian control that is antithetical to traditional American political culture.

This is precisely the thesis of my 2019 book Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition: Evolutionary Origins, History, and Prospects for the Future where I document the rise of the substantially Jewish elite (Ch. 6; see also here) and describe how this new elite is shaping attitudes via domination of the media, the educational system, and political culture. Rejecting the libertarian framework, the new elite favors censoring ideas that conflict with these messages (Ch. 8), and it has established a two-tier justice system in which dissidents from the established orthodoxy are treated far more harshly than those favored by the new elite. In Chapter 9 I argue that traditional Western individualism is under dire threat from this assault. I would add that our new elite is not only alien to traditional Western values, it is also a hostile elite—hostile to the traditional people and culture of America, and that their desired multicultural future in which Whites would be a much-hated minority is very dangerous for Whites.

And I agree entirely that Jews “took advantage of American opportunities.” Because of their intelligence, their ethnic networking, and their long experience as merchants and in  financial matters, Jews  have certainly shown that they are quite successful in an individualist economic system (capitalism) and they have taken advantage of the relatively low ethnocentrism that is an integral aspect of individualism. As I noted in Chapter 8 of Individualism,

as emphasized throughout this book, White people tend to be more individualistic than other peoples, implying that they are less likely than other peoples to make invidious distinctions between ingroups and outgroups and they are more likely to be open to strangers and people who don’t look like them. Because Whites are low in ethnocentrism and high in conscientiousness, controlling ethnocentrism is easier for them. Their subcortical mechanisms responsible for ethnocentrism are weaker to start with and hence easier to control [via messages from the media and educational system enabled by top-down inhibitory control over the modular processing typical of the lower brain].

As a result,  this new elite encountered only minimal resistance from the old American elite which was under intense pressure during the 1950s and capitulated entirely in the 1960s and 70s—the era that resulted in Roe v. Wade (1973), civil rights legislation, affirmative action, replacement-level non-White immigration, etc.

Critically relevant is that Dugin notes parallels of the new elite with Bolshevik attitudes of authoritarian control, including “destruction” of those seen as having the wrong attitudes: “If you are not a progressive, you are a Nazi and “must be destroyed.”

These elites, often left-liberal, sometimes openly Trotskyist, have brought with them a position that is deeply alien to the American spirit: the belief in linear progress [as in Marxism]. …

However, the emigrants from the Old World brought with them very different attitudes. For them, progress was a dogma. All history was seen as continuous improvement, as a continuous process of emancipation, improvement, development and accumulation of knowledge [presumably a reference to Marxism]. Progress was a philosophy and a religion. In the name of progress, which included a continuous increase in individual freedoms, technical development and the abolition of traditions and taboos, everything was possible and necessary, and it no longer mattered whether it worked or not. What mattered was progress.

This, however, represented a completely new interpretation of liberalism for the American tradition. The old liberalism argued: no one can ever impose anything on me. The new liberalism responded: a culture of abolition, shaming, total elimination of old habits, sex change, freedom to dispose of the human foetus (pro-choice), equal rights for women and races is not just a possibility, it is a necessity. The old liberalism said: be what you want, as long as it works. The new one replied: you have no right not to be a liberal. If you are not a progressive, you are a Nazi and must be destroyed. Everything must be sacrificed in the name of freedom, LGBT+, transgender and artificial intelligence.

We often hear the phrase “on the right side of history” from progressives, the idea being that history is going in only one direction and change in that direction is inevitable. At this time, being on the right side of history means believing that you believe in a future in which White “racism” is abolished and all peoples will live together in peace and harmony, ethnic conflicts will be abolished, and all groups—freed from the scourge of White racism—will have the same average level of income and achievement. Such a utopian view flies in the face of the long history of ethnic/racial conflict and the reality of biologically based race differences. But believing it is progressive dogma and, as Dugin would say, “If you are not a progressive, you are a Nazi and must be destroyed.”

Dugin is quite aware of the opposition of our hostile elite to Donald Trump:

The conflict between the two societies — the old libertarian, pragmatic one and the new neoliberal, progressive one — has steadily escalated over the past decades and culminated in the Trump presidency. Trump has embodied one America and his globalist democratic opponents the other. The civil war of philosophies has reached a critical point.

As I have written before, Trump made many mistakes and often fumbled the ball on his appointments (although the pool of mainstream Republicans from which he chose was completely corrupt, and he saddled himself with Jared and Ivanka as central players). However, his campaign pronouncements were clearly anti-globalist—opposing immigration (not just illegal), building the wall, wanting better relations with Russia, removing U.S. troops from the Middle East, complaining about the effects of immigration (“Paris isn’t Paris any more”), etc. These pronouncements engendered an unprecedented uproar from our hostile elite (now being reenacted as a result of the recent SCOTUS rulings—blamed on Trump because of his choices in SCOTUS nominations) and the Washington bureaucracy—the deep state (including the FBI). Media articles during the 2016 campaign were replete with messages that Trump was the reincarnation of Hitler, etc. This hostility continued throughout Trump’s presidency resulting in the prolonged Mueller investigation (based on the Russia collusion hoax) and two impeachments by the Democrat-controlled House (with the help of some Republicans). For the entire four years, there was an atmosphere of crisis surrounding Trump’s presidency, and this has continued now with the January 6 Committee hearings (which are mainly aimed at preventing Trump from running again).

Dugin repeats his emphasis on the totalitarian and violent tendencies of the new elite:

New America … insists that freedom requires violence against those who do not understand it well enough. Which means that freedom must have a normative interpretation and it is up to the neo-liberals themselves to determine how and to whom they use it and how they interpret it. The old liberalism is libertarian. The new is blatantly totalitarian. The Supreme Court is now overturning the totalitarian dictatorial strategy of the neo-liberal globalist elites, who act — a bit like the Bolsheviks in Russia — in the name of the future.

Yes, but I’d say it’s more than “a bit like the Bolsheviks.” Moreover, it’s tempting to think that Dugin is here linking Bolshevik-type authoritarian attitudes to the Jewish overrepresentation in the new American elite, given that he noted the obvious role of Jews in the new globalist elite dominating America, and his likely awareness of the well known outsized Jewish role in the murderous, intensely authoritarian early decades of the USSR with its utopian promises of creating the New Soviet Man. This very large role of Jews in the early decades of the USSR has also been noted by Putin and is presumably common knowledge among Russian intellectuals.

And the almost desperate old Americans, pragmatists and libertarians rejoice [at overturning Roe v. Wade]: the freedom to do what you want, not what the progressives and technocrats say, to go in any direction, not just where the globalists are forcibly sending us, has triumphed again, and Missouri’s brave attorney general has already shown what can be done. Bravo! It is a pragmatic revolution, an American-style conservative revolution.
Of course, all the globalist progressive crap is about to go down the drain. The old America has in a way counter-attacked the new America. “If the kingdom of law is divided in itself, it will surely become desolate”. Matthew 12:25 Better sooner than later…

“Better sooner than later.” I couldn’t agree more. While the White population still has political and demographic clout.

Dugin’s comments on the alien American elite and his strong support for the Ukrainian war make clear the dominant Russian perspective on this conflict. They see it correctly as a conflict between Russian sovereignty and neoliberal globalist elites based in the West that are aiming for a unipolar world with themselves dominating a subservient, relatively powerless Russia. It is the world dreamed of in the 1990s during the Yeltsin administration and abruptly snuffed out by the rise of Putin. Neoconservatives have targeted Russia ever since.

Make no mistake. It is critical for Russia to win this war. But it’s quite clear that the [Jewish] neoconservatives (Blinken, Nuland, Sherman) dominating the Biden administration’s foreign policy also see this as a critically important struggle, and they have continued to increase the U.S. commitment—willing to fight to the last Ukrainian. And, I suspect that ultimately they will be willing to use U.S. troops in the conflict to prevent a Russian victory. (read more)

______________________

Permission is hereby granted to any and all to copy and paste any entry on this page and convey it electronically along with its URL, http://www.usaapay.com/comm.html

______________________


2022 ARCHIVE

January 4 - 9

January 10 - 16

January 18 - 22

January 23 - 29

January 30 - 31

February 1 - 6

February 7 - 10

February 11 - 15

February 16 - 20

February 22 - 28
March 1 - 7

March 8 - 17

March 18 - 25

March 26 - 31
April 1 - 8

April 9 - 17

April 18 - 25

April 26 - 30

May 1 - 9

May 10 - 14

May 15 - 23

May 24 - 31
 
June 1 - 10

June 11 - 17

June 18 - 26

June 27 - 30
July
August
September
October

November

December


2021 ARCHIVE


January 1 - 6

January 7 - 13

January 14 - 20

January 21 - 24

January 25 - 28

January 29 - 31

February 1 - 4

February 5 - 10

February 11 - 21

February 22 - 24

February 25 - 28
March 1 - 9

March 10 - 17

March 18 - 23

March 24 - 31
April 1 - 8

April 9 - 14

April 15 - 18

April 19 - 24

April 25 - 30

May 1 - 5

May 6 - 10

May 11 - 15

May 16 - 22

May 23 - 26

May 27 - 29

May 30 - 31
 
June 1 - 5

June 6 - 8

June 9 - 12

June 13 - 19

June 20 - 24

June 25 - 30
July 1 - 6

July 7 - 10

July 11 - 17

July 18 - 23

July 24 - 28

July 29 - 31
August 1 - 5

August 6 - 8

August 9 - 14

August 15 - 18

August 19 - 23

August 24 - 28

August 29 - 31
September 1 - 4

September 5 - 9

September 10 - 16

September 17 - 21

September 22 - 27

September 28 - 30

October 1 - 5

October 6 - 9

October 10 - 14

October 15 - 20

October 21 - 27

October 28 - 31

November 1 - 6

November 7 - 10

November 11 - 14

November 15 - 20

November 21 - 25

November 26 - 30
December 1 - 4

December 5 - 9

December 10 - 13

December 14 - 18

December 19 - 26

December 27 - 31

2020 ARCHIVE

January
February March
April 1 - 15

April 16- 30

May 1 - 15

May 16- 31
 
June 1 - 15

June 16- 30
July 1 - 15

July 16- 31
Aug 1 - 15

Aug 16 - 31
September 1 - 15

September 16 - 30
October 1 - 15

October 16 - 23

Ocober 24 - 31
November 1 - 8

November 9 - 15

November 16 - 21

November 22 - 30
December 1 - 7

December 8 - 12

December 13 - 16

December 17 - 20

December 21 - 27

December 28 - 31

-0-
...
 News and facts for those sick and tired of the National Propaganda Radio version of reality.


- Unlike all the legacy media, our editorial offices are not in Langley, Virginia.


- You won't catch us fiddling while Western Civilization burns.


-
Close the windows so you don't hear the mockingbird outside, grab a beer, and see what the hell is going on as we witness the controlled demolition of our society.


- The truth usually comes from one source. It comes quietly, with no heralds. Untruths come from multiple sources, in unison, and incessantly.


- The loudest partisans belong to the smallest parties. The media exaggerate their size and influence.


THE ARCHIVE PAGE
.

QUOTES
finger
Richard Feynman, “Learn from science that you must doubt the experts. As a matter of fact, I can also define science another way: Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.”

Friedrich Nietzsche, “The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.”

Dwight D. Eisenhower, “Here in America, we are descended in blood and in spirit from revolutionists and rebels – men and women who dare to dissent from accepted doctrine. As their heirs, may we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion.”

H. L. Mencken, “All government, in its essence, is a conspiracy against the superior man: its one permanent object is to oppress him and cripple him. If it be aristocratic in organization, then it seeks to protect the man who is superior only in law against the man who is superior in fact; if it be democratic, then it seeks to protect the man who is inferior in every way against both. One of its primary functions is to regiment men by force, to make them as much alike as possible and as dependent upon one another as possible, to search out and combat originality among them. All it can see in an original idea is potential change, and hence an invasion of its prerogatives. The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane and intolerable, and so, if he is romantic, he tries to change it. And even if he is not romantic personally he is very apt to spread discontent among those who are.”


No Thanks
POTENTIAL TOPICS
news, real news, exposé, investigation, fact, just the facts, journalism, journalist, unsubstantiated, allegation, academia, academic, expert, intellectual, Middle East expert, Think Tank, opinion, opinion maker, approved opinion, editorial, Overton Window, fake news, agenda, intellectual, court historian, pundit, bien pensant, dumbing down, stonewall, stonewalling, cognitive dissonance, narrative, rumor, baseless rumor, controlled explanation, indoctrination, propaganda, Bernays, censorship, Operation Mockingbird, Wurlitzer, conspiracy theory, Newspeak, memory hole, manipulation, delegitimizing, deplatforming, lobbyist, quid pro quo, corruption, pay to play, influence, influence peddling, hate, hate speech, two minutes hate, Orwell, Orwellian, 1984, Big Brother, artificial intelligence, artificial idiocy, AI, face recognition, robots, technology, Richard Stallman, GNU, internet, web, Luddite, privilege, Asian privilege, black privilege, brown privilege, white privilege, identity politics, intersectionality, intersectionality privilege, egalitarianism, equal outcome, equal opportunity, equality, outrage, feigned outrage, virtue, virtue signalling, cultural appropriation, safe space, infantilizing, marginalized, vulnerable, at risk, victimized, victim, victim card, victim group, resentment, affirmative action, quotas, affirmative action hires, ethnic, ethnic group, ethnicity, diverse, diversity, inclusive, multicultural, multiculturalism, tolerance, repressive tolerance, grievance studies, Frankfurt School, Theodor Adorno, Antonio Gramsci, Gramscian, Georg Lukacs, Max Horkheimer, Herbert Marcuse, Wilhelm "Willi" Münzenberg, Political Correctness, politically correct, Kulturkampf, culture war, Cultural Marxism, Cultural Maoism, Cultural Revolution, Marx, Marxist, Marxism, Lenin, Bolshevik, Trotsky (Bronstein), Stalin, Communist, communist sympathizer, fellow traveler, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, FDR, Socialist, National Socialist, National Socialist German Worker's Party, fascist, nusquama, Utopia, utopian, administration, regime, regime change, Democrat, RINO, centrist, moderate, populist, radical, radicalization, Neocon, Evangelical, warmonger, authoritarian, Neoconservative, Republican, Old Right, Classical Liberal, Libertarian, majority, majority rule, mob, mob rule, founders, framers, separation of powers, Marbury vs. Madison, liberal, conservative, election, vote, voter, poll, surveillance, Silicon Valley, social media, DARPA, coverup, FOIA, redacted, Glomar response, unredacted, revolution, color revolution, revolutionary, Jacobin, insurgent, assassin, assassination, lone wolf, terror, terrorist, terrorism, Menachem Begin, reign of terror, state sponsor of terror, CIA, Mossad, MI5, MI6, entrapment, 18 U.S.C. § 1001, perjury trap, 302, Federal Bureau of Instigation, Federal Bureau of Insurrection, Federal Bureau of Intimidation, fall guy, patsy, informant, informer, agents provocateurs, torture, interrogation, enhanced interrogation, enabling act, police, militarized police, police state, police brutality, policing, broken window policing, guilty until proven innocent, jail, prison, carceral state, for profit prison, security, security theater, false flag, Gladio, rape hoax, Tawana Brawley, Wanetta Gibson, Crystal Gail Mangum, Duke lacrosse team, Jackie Coakley, Sabrina Rubin Erdely, hate hoax, Jussie Smollett, noose, swastika, class, social class, bias, choice, discrimination, freedom, preference, right of association, assortative mating, social construct, race, race card, racial identity, racism, racist, minority, model minority, credit to your race, tribe, tribal, cousin marriage, heredity, genome, genetics, chromosomes, creativity, intelligence, IQ, bell curve, merit, meritocracy, sex, gender, binary, nurture versus nature, Human Action, von Mises, economics, dismal science, Adam Smith, Austrian Economics, Menger, capitalism, capitalist, capital, asset, productive asset, income, income inequality, bank, bankruptcy, fractional reserve banking, reserve currency, dollar, petrodollar, yuan, yen, euro, pound sterling, inflation, monetary inflation, deflation, bullion, gold, sovereign, gold sovereign, silver, platinum, precious metals, savings, price discovery, honest price discovery, stimulus, helicopter money, central planning, Wall Street, Plunge Protection Team, President's Working Group, bubble, asset bubble, irrational exuberance, crash, investments, equities, options, commodities, leverage, hedge fund, risk, risk assets, counterparty risk, contagion, collapse, offshore, offshore account, offshore trust, shell company, derivatives, short selling, naked short selling, stocks, bonds, junk bonds, fracking, abiotic petroleum, oil shale, diminishing returns, financialization, monetizing debt, debt, note, mortgage, interest rate, negative interest rate, quantitative easing, QE, repo market, repurchase agreement, panic, panic printing, primary dealer, scam, Social Security, Ponzi scheme, Federal Reserve, Eccles Building, Constitution Avenue, New York Fed, 33 Liberty Street, People's Bank of China, European Central Bank, Bank of England, Bank of Japan, Bank for International Settlements, International Monetary Fund, IMF, Bretton Woods, technical default, Fort Knox, tungsten bars, gold-plated tungsten bars, gold leasing, audit, gold window, Nixon, 15 August 1971, recession, depression, Great Depression, Florence Owens Thompson, Dust Bowl, unemployment, supply chain, supply chain disruption, Little Ice Age, solar minimum, unseasonable cold, crop failure, starvation, riots, food riots, martial law, militia, resistance, secession, liberty

If you let them redefine words, they will control language.
If you let them control language, they will control thoughts.
If you let them control thoughts, they will control you. They will own you.

© 2020 - 2021 - thenotimes.com - All Rights Reserved