Two women show how completely insane COVID mania has driven people

One of the points I've been making over the years of political writing is that leftism has driven young white women crazy.  They are imbued with self-loathing because they're White but nevertheless feel a deep sense of victimhood because they're female.  A recent video, however, indicates that it's not just young women whom leftism has driven insane.  The video seems to show two older women, upon finding an unmasked young Black man on an elevator, wildly attacking him as they try desperately to get him and his unmasked self off the elevator.
 
It's a little hard to figure out what's going on in this 30-second video, but, after suffering through it a couple of times, I think I've got the idea.

A Black man was on an elevator.  Then, two middle-aged White women got on and completely freaked out.  The best guess for their freak-out is that he wasn't wearing a mask (which is indicated by the clarity with which he speaks, unmuffled by a face diaper).

At some point in their freak-out, the man began filming the women as they tried to film him.  Despite apparently being terrified by his germs, the women swarmed the man, at which point he put his hands up defensively to protect himself against them.  One of the women then hit him, and, when he called her on it, she began chanting, "Black lives matter," while her companion continued to insist that he leave the elevator.  Here — see for yourself:

More mask madness, this time in an elevator. The mask police are really nuts pic.twitter.com/3BpvLjdJwD

— Libs of Tik Tok (@libsoftiktok) January 24, 2022

What is there even left to say about these women?  Like sponges, or the drain below a filthy sink, over the past two years, they've absorbed every bit of madness leftists have pumped into the American environment.  COVID fear, mask mania, racial obsessions, bullying...it's all there, compressed into a 30-second video.

The young man, to his credit, even while protesting, managed to keep a pleasant affect.  However, if my reading of what happened on that video is correct, I would have advised him to leave that elevator immediately.  Crazy people have no stopping point, and things could have gone from stupid and irritating to dangerous in a matter of seconds.  Instead, he should have stepped off, taken his video to the police, and charged those women with assault.  All this bullying hysteria must stop, and the best way to stop it is for the people acting out their leftist-inspired madness to face serious consequences.

In any event, Twitter users had some excellent points about what was happening in that video:

I was told mass formation psychosis isn't real.

— Bridget Phetasy (@BridgetPhetasy) January 24, 2022

Worst part? He was in the elevator first.

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) January 24, 2022

Every. Single. White. Progressive. Woman.

— My4HoosierGirls (@LegalBeagle78) January 24, 2022

pic.twitter.com/uq4KVWXMek

— cooper (@chadley_99) January 24, 2022

I'll be interested to know if the backstory to this video ever emerges.  Our assumptions about what happened may be completely wrong.  Still, the women's crazed energy so perfectly matches the modern zeitgeist that it's hard to believe the video isn't showing exactly what it seems to show. (read more)

Lia Thomas Teammate: Transgender Swimmer's Male Genitalia Exposed in Locker Room

University of Pennsylvania women’s swim team member says it's 'definitely awkward'

A teammate of the controversial University of Pennsylvania swimmer Lia Thomas has revealed that sharing a locker room with the biological male transgender is "definitely awkward."

Women's swimming "champion" Thomas is a biological male who "identifies" as female.

The swim team member told The Daily Mail that the locker room she shares with Thomas is “definitely awkward because Lia still has male body parts and is still attracted to women.”

The anonymous teammate said that Thomas's genitals are frequently exposed to the rest of the female team, according to The Daily Mail report.

The team member stated that, although Thomas’s male genitals are sometimes covered by a towel, Thomas’s nudity is often revealed, exposing the genitalia for the women on the team to glimpse.

The teammate said the rest of the female team feels extremely uncomfortable in the locker room.

Thomas has told teammates of having dated women, The Daily Mail reported.

The anonymous teammate purportedly charged that women on the team have articulated their concern with the coach, Mike Schnur, in order to get Thomas barred from the locker room, but to no avail.

She stated:

Multiple swimmers have raised it, multiple different times. But we were basically told that we could not ostracize Lia by not having her in the locker room and that there’s nothing we can do about it, that we basically have to roll over and accept it, or we cannot use our own locker room. …

It’s really upsetting because Lia doesn’t seem to care how it makes anyone else feel.

The 35 of us are just supposed to accept being uncomfortable in our own space and locker room for, like, the feelings of one.

The school was so focused on making sure Lia was okay, and doing everything they possibly could do for her, that they didn’t even think about the rest of us.

It just seems like the women who built this program and the people who were here before Lia don’t matter.

And it’s frustrating because Lia doesn’t really seem to be bothered by all the attention, not at all.

Actually she seems like she enjoys it.

It’s affected all of us way more than it’s affected her.

The teammate told The Daily Mail she had discussed with her teammates possibly launching a protest at a swim meet, but the consensus was they would be putting themselves at risk.

She stated, “We’ve all tried to think of anything we could do, but I just don’t know what we could do that wouldn’t basically have us not be swimming.

"We already lost a year due to covid and people don’t want to put their own swim careers on hold.”

(read more)

Kees Van Der Pijl: The Virus Crisis is a Fraud & Cover for a Global Political Seizure of Power

Watch on Rokfin / Rumble / BitChute / Brighteon

Professor Kees van der Pijl discusses his new book which explains how the virus crisis is a fraud and cover for political seizure of power. The medical emergency is just a pretext for digital identity passport systems. He discusses the players behind this ruling oligarchy whose concentration is unprecedented in history. Elites are using a strategy of tension to subjugate an otherwise unruly global populace which has been on the verge of 1848-style revolution. The medical phase of the coup can turn toward war (e.g. Russia) as another means of consolidating rule. The ruling class believes they have a small window of time to cement their power on the heels of the historic AI revolution. He explains the mechanisms by which the oligarchy is able to impose worldwide regulatory processes on entire continents and how China is cooperating in this ‘ultra-imperialism’ with the West. He’s optimistic that the political project that is Covid can’t go on for much longer, will fall apart, and that they do not yet possess the technology required to roll out a total digital control system. A core group of society is also increasingly rejecting their insane vision of the future.

TRANSCRIPT

Geopolitics & Empire:

The Geopolitics & Empire podcast is joined by Dutch political economist, Dr. Kees van der Pijl. He taught at the University of Amsterdam and the University of Sussex. He is the author of numerous books, but today we’ll be talking about his new absolutely must-read book, States OF Emergency: Keeping the Global Population in Check. Welcome Kees. How is the state of emergency going over there in the Netherlands?

Kees van der Pijl:

Well, it’s pretty bleak. And you may have seen that I dedicated the book to the young, because in my view, the children and the student age are really bearing the brunt of this. Because for somebody of my age, I now find that two years is nothing. Entirely speaking for myself and my wife, for us it was an interesting time, politically interesting and so on, but if I see what happens to my children+ and to all the children here and to students, we’re looking at a drama, because for them, two years is a lifetime if you’re developing. So in that sense, I’m really very gloomy, and of course we are subject now to the rollout of an EU project of a digital identity, and that’s what it’s all about. The whole medical thing is just a pretext to get us used to taking vaccinations.

Everything is in a very incomplete state, so it will probably end in a disaster and chaos anyway, but that in itself is not a promising prospect. Now, Holland is unrecognizable, I would say, except if you compare it to the second world war and the occupation in which the Dutch population already gave a taste of a very peculiar attitude which can only be compared with some Eastern European countries. For instance, we… Well, I wasn’t there of course, but the generation of my parents and grandparents, they basically let the Jews of Holland being abducted, never to return, whereas the rest of Western Europe on average had a better attitude, hiding people to a greater degree. It happened here in Holland as well, but anyway, that’s the comparison that keeps popping up.

This is the first time since the second world war that we had a curfew, that we had a lockdown, that we had police brutality to a degree not seen in this country in my whole lifetime. And everything is being denied, and I’m not telling you anything that you didn’t know already, but it’s grim. And it’s not grim for me because I’m sitting here and functioning, but it’s grim for the children. I just heard today that neither of my small grandchildren want to go to school any longer because they have to wear masks in the corridor, and kids get nervous of that because they don’t know why that would be.

Geopolitics & Empire:

Yeah. Yeah. I agree with you as well. And I feel the exact same way, the fear is not for myself, but for the youth and my children. I can deal with these things. I’ve lived a good enough life until now, so I don’t care about myself. And I also think it’s a fair comparison what you bring up. I’ve been saying this from the beginning. And I was in Central Asia in 2020, and I actually had planned to move back to Europe to my homeland of Croatia, but as soon as I discovered what was really going on behind the state of emergency, in early 2020, I decided to flee back to Latin America where I thought we would have more freedoms for a bit longer, which has been proving to be the case so far. And I think it’s-

Kees van der Pijl:

In Mexico, huh?

Geopolitics & Empire:

Yeah, in Mexico. They just activated also vaccine certificates here a week ago, so it’s a battle. 500 people have filed an injunction against the governor because it’s anti-constitutional. But also your comparison with World War II, there’s a Croatian MEP who recently-

Kees van der Pijl:

I saw him.

Geopolitics & Empire:

Yeah. He yelled at Macron and von der Leyen, and comparing what is happening now to the Nazi occupation, so you’re not alone. But let’s get through your book. There’s so much here. I highly recommend this book. I think it’s on sale actually at Clarity Press, 40% off, people can go there now. But there’s so much information in it, and it’s hard to pick a place to start, but you [inaudible 00:05:01] that the ruling oligarchy has seized on the virus outbreak, having manufactured it essentially to declare a state of emergency in order to put the breaks on the IT revolution from ushering in a democratic transformation, like the printing press did in the middle ages. You talk about an internationalized global state dominated by international capital which has been preparing for economic collapse and 1848 style revolutions. You also call this oligarchy the intelligence IT media block. So maybe to start, people will always ask, who are they, and how would you describe this ruling oligarchy?

Kees van der Pijl:

Well, the first thing from a theoretical viewpoint is that you should never fix it as an existing entity which doesn’t change. The title of my doctoral dissertation somewhere decades and decades ago had class formation, and I think when you think of a ruling class and any other class in society, you always should think of class formation that is within society like a magnetic field. There occurs a certain sense of direction in a particular way. When you mentioned this triangle that I sketch in the book, the intelligence services, IT giants and the media, they constitute a core that leads this process of class formation in the current period. That will be my thesis.

And of course that doesn’t exhaust the other components or fractions of a ruling class. They also must become involved in that process of class formation, because they can’t take time enough off and wait for better times or whatever. So even the banks who are now being disciplined in my view have to be on board and want to be on board. The pharmaceutical companies join the process because, almost unexpectedly for them at least in the longer view, they become very important. If you think back of the war on terror, for instance, the pharmaceutical industry of course was somewhere at the end of the line, they had no particular role to play.

Suddenly, they found themselves in the forefront, because the medical pretext for the whole politics of fear that is being rolled out now is of a different kind. So in that sense, class transformation takes a different turn. You always have to compare it to the war on terror, because that was basically at an international level at least the first time that a comprehensive politics of fear was rolled out, some people say, to deal with the Seattle explosion, with the sudden explosion against the extreme free trade that was in the works.

There are many other elements that enter into that, but in that case, you still had a different… Well, not necessarily a triangle, but you had a different block of forces leading the process of transformation, and this has now switched to the triangle that I just described and that I explain in the book, which is pretty self-evident. Of course if it’s an IT revolution, then the revolutionaries must include the people who created this IT world, which is basically a state-driven invention process which was then privatized after 1990, because after 1990, capital no longer tolerated any sort of public constraint imposed on it. So in that sense, after the collapse of the Soviet Bloc in the state socialist episode, everything has to be privatized by the logic of the system, and it’s that process which created the oligarchy in its present form.

But we shouldn’t forget that, even in the crisis itself, so in the crisis of the COVID circus, the oligarchy is condensing to an almost unbelievable degree. I’ve heard things like a billion a day that’s being earned extra by Elon Musk and Amazon boss and Gates and so on, but that’s the anecdotal side of it. But it’s an oligarchy in an unprecedented sense. At no point in history, except in ancient empires for instance, has there been a ruling group which is so small compared to the rest of society. And the whole middle class, people like myself, the sort of pity [bijoux 00:10:24] academics and so on, they’re being expropriated.

You feel that your savings are going and… I mean, I’m not wailing here about my material position, but just to indicate that even classes that would normally be considered as political supports for the upper ruling class are being sacrificed to its enrichment, which is not a matter of ill will on the part of the top people, it’s simply how the system operates. Concentration of centralization is the name of the game, and that’s what’s happening now, except it’s going into overdrive, in extreme and absurd forms, and that also tells you that this process can’t go on for much longer.

Geopolitics & Empire:

Yeah. And speaking of the inflation and such, we can also feel it here in Mexico. I feel it-

Kees van der Pijl:

I guess so. Yeah.

Geopolitics & Empire:

… As well. It’s truly global across the board. And you also mentioned some of the people that all of us are familiar with in your book, such as the Bilderberg Group, The Trilateral Commission, now in other manifestation the World Economic Forum. All of these groups were also mentioned by my recent guest and my former professor, Alfred de Zayas, UN special reporter. He briefly mentions them in his book, Building a Just World Order. Also from Clarity Press. But you mentioned the financial crisis. We have the 2008 global financial crisis where there was this huge discontent of the masses manifesting itself. We’ve had the Arab Spring, the Occupy Wall Street movement, the Yellow Vests, Brexit, Trump, and so on, and all of a sudden magically the UN declares a pandemic.

And on my podcast, one of my missions has always been to kind of filter through the nonsense and kind of get to the point. I hate beating around the bush. And you do a great job with your book. You conclude that the virus crisis is a fraud, it’s a cover for political seizure of power. I don’t want to spend so much time on the medical aspects, because most of the people listening to this are familiar with it, they should get your book and look at those details. We know the masks don’t work and the PCR tests are fraudulent. So I want to dig deeper behind this political seizure of power and why it’s the case.

You say that there is no proportionality between the actual medical emergency and the measures applied, that decades ago, the elite foresaw the end of this economic system which would result in 1848 style revolutions and general popular revolt. You write that the IT revolution has given them the ability to evade a physical war against the population via the alternative of permanent surveillance and information warfare. This panopticon is the model for our form of late capitalism, the surveillance society organized and operated by the IT industry. So basically you see as the main driver of this COVID state of emergency the threats of a new 1848, so can you kind of tell us what’s really going on here?

Kees van der Pijl:

Well, basically you can go back to the war on terror, but before that, I would always think of the 1970s in Italy and other European countries where you had terror scares, and not just scares, but real atrocities. And as always, the Italians have been very good in political analysis. Why that is, I don’t have an immediate explanation. But in Italy… I have several books by Italians about the 1970s strategy of tension, which was the US, German, Israeli policy of preventing communists from becoming part of the governing coalition or the governing bloc in Italy, and they succeeded in not only preventing that, the so-called historic compromise between Christian democracy and communism, but they also discovered something which is again in operation today, and that is that politics of fear leads a population that basically is fed up with the people it’s being governed by to actually draw closer to that government.

Because basically the government tells the population, you may hate us as much as you like, but the only people who can protect you against bombs is us, so you better join us. And you can transpose that straight to the present situation. Again, the governments, but now all over the world, practically speaking, are saying to the population, maybe you hate us, maybe you’re deeply dissatisfied about inequalities that you’re victimized by, but the only people who can protect you against this terrible virus is us and the medical authorities, and that’s a lesson of political science. It was really discovered in the 1970s, as far as I can see, and it evolved in several European countries. In Germany, you had your own terror episode, and with the war on terror, it became universalized.

So United States took the lead in this whole process. And we’re now living through another episode of politics of fear, but at the same time, we shouldn’t accept or we shouldn’t think that the medical phase that we’re now in, which is a pretext for the seizure of power, should therefor always remain a psychological war against the population. What is happening today on the border with Russia in Ukraine may well be an option. I mean, again, these options are also objective. There’s not some Dr. Evil who’s sitting somewhere with his little pussycat in his lap directing it all. I mean, these are processes which have a dynamic of their own, and which therefore produce contradictions in the sense that the forces that are associated with what [inaudible 00:17:17] calls the [biopolitical 00:17:19] complex may not like at all what is happening on the Ukrainian, Russian border, but of course the arms industries will press in that direction, irrespective of the longer term, broader class interest, or the entire ruling [inaudible 00:17:38] in the west.

And that’s contradictory, because it may well be that an open fight on the Ukrainian, Russian border might lead to a complete unraveling of the whole COVID process, but you can also interpret it as a systemic transition which maintains the idea of a politics of fear, except it switches it to a different terrain, it will therefore entail restructuring of the leading groups. No longer the media and the IT giants, first of all, but mainly… Well, they will be related to them, but then more in the defense field. I’m just mentioning it to indicate that once you allow an unstable situation to develop, the instability itself takes over to an extent that prevents any conspiratorial policy on the part of the ruling class from really reaching its goals.

So we are already seeing that the medical pretax is coming apart. We are seeing that… At least that’s my claim, that the technical ability to inject all sort of nano beacons into people is completely immature. I mean, that doesn’t exist. I mean, it’s amazing what I’ve seen on film myself what is already contained in these so-called vaccines, but even, so it’s not a hermetic system yet able to be imposed on the population as a whole. Large parts of the population gets salt water injected, simply because they need control groups in the same population that they are injecting with the very dangerous substances. So the point is that the politics of fear is itself a crisis phenomenon that is open-ended, it’s unclear where it will end, but we can say that every separate chapter of the politics of fear, whether it was terrorism, or Putin is coming, or the virus, et cetera, also has its own internal contradictions which prevent it from reaching a logical conclusion.

Look at what came out of the war on terror. Was terror defeated? No, of course not. The middle east was thrown into chaos, and even far more than just the middle east, because as far as China, Central Asia, you name it, all these areas are now in a deep, deep crisis, and sometimes I think under the present system they won’t come out of it any longer. Well, you will be in a better position to explain what’s happening in Latin America, but I can’t imagine that their future is bright in the current circumstances, because once your economic system is failing… And that’s the [inaudible 00:21:12] below the whole thing. They must keep the machine rolling. And once your economic system is failing… And it failed definitively in 2008, although it took another decade before that became fully clear to all concerned, then anything can happen every day. And yet the old system produced, for instance, an over-armament of the world to such a degree that you only have to strike a match here or there, and you have full scale, highly-destructive type of war that, with nuclear weapons around, can end anywhere.

Geopolitics & Empire:

You mentioned the medical dictatorship basically, and I often think of all of the people around me, let’s say the masses, and they really haven’t a clue, they think they’re still in a democracy, but you discuss the biosecurity state, biopoliticxs, biosafety, which you also describe having a religious element, this is what they’re trying to put us into. Some also relate it technocracy. You cite Catherine Austin Fitts in describing epidemics as having become the medical variant of false flag operations, which is what I have been saying since the beginning describing COVID as. Could you tell us a little bit more of what is this biopoliticxs, biosecurity state that they want to put us into?

Kees van der Pijl:

Yeah. Well, humanity is at a crossroads. One of, we may assume the last book by James Lovelock, the famous natural scientist and inventor who became famous with his Gaia hypothesis of the self-sustaining earth, earth as a quasi, a natural body which reacts as an organism. He wrote a final book which is called NOVACENE. And by NOVACENE, he means a sort of ultimate Pleistocene or the Holocene, a geophysical era in which humanity is tied to artificial intelligence. And he says, basically, if we can avoid a comet crashing into the earth or a nuclear war, we can project hundreds of years or more of human existence, continuing with the help of artificial intelligence, and even colonizing large parts of the universe. Now, it’s that sort of idea which was also propounded by others that has somehow captivated some of the leading lights of the capitalist class, like Eric Schmidt of Google and certain futuristic thinkers.

And they have assumed that with technology progressing so fast and artificial intelligence progressing so fast… For instance, my book was translated also by a machine translation into German and French. And these are both languages that I can read well, and I really read it with open mouth. What a quality translation that was, just from a computer. And that’s entirely based on artificial intelligence, because it relies on the highlights of world literature in these various languages, and it does that all in a split second. Now, that that didn’t exist at this level of quality five years ago, and now it’s for free. So artificial intelligence developed very fast, and some of these strategies of the ruling class who are really strategists of the ruling class in the sense that they think for it… Mind you that in every epoch of history, the ruling clause was a pretty stupid bunch.

They were good at what they were supposed to do, whether it was managing [inaudible 00:25:37] for exported crops or whatever to big industry, or now banking, or you name it, but they’re not very smart in the sense of understanding what historical conjuncture is that they’re operating in, what the challenges are that they have to face. So every epoch of history has a ruling class in the sense that a class that’s forming, et cetera, but one part of the formation of such a ruling class or ruling bloc is the presence of so-called organic intellectuals. In the old Roman days, the Patricians also apparently were a pretty stupid bunch, but they had Caesar who thought for them, who spoke for them. Locke spoke for the English liberals in the 17th century. And in the same way, these people like Eric Schmidt of Google and Ray Kurzweil and all these other people conceive of themselves also as leading thinkers.

They call themselves thinkers, and they think for the larger mass of… Even for the oligarchy. Not all of the oligarchs are equally adroit at maneuvering politically in a situation that they’re facing now, so they rely on these people. And in the current situation, a number of thinkers in that sense, so organic intellectuals of the information revolution have thought that we are already entering the era where artificial intelligence can take over, and they have realized that for the ruling class, this is a unique moment that will not recur if you don’t grasp it now. So you will have to deploy the whole AI infrastructure, develop it very fast, and make sure that before people begin to realize that you might be able to do most fantastic things, things that realize humanity in a much deeper sense and open up fantastic vistas of human development…

Of course I’m overdoing it a little bit. Before that can happen, we must make sure that people walk in step and that there’s no uncontrollable thing like the Arab Spring, for instance, which still had to be repressed by a recurrence of dictatorship by wars and NATO intervention, you name it. And that’s the more historical, philosophical background of what we are experiencing now. There was an urgency to intervene in a historic process. Some of the people thought of themselves as being able to understand the consequences of what was at stake and what was possible, the only problem is that they came up with solutions which are technically not yet feasible, but most importantly, which are unacceptable to parts of society that are too large, too independent-minded, too resilient to submit. And I can see that in Europe very clearly that at least let’s say 20 to 40% of the population of every European country is not inclined to follow any such futuristic project if it is based on a complete denial of fundamental rights and freedoms that people were used to.

In China and certain other Asian countries, more is possible in disrespect, because people were used for generations of not going too far in questioning the legitimacy of power, but here in Europe, there’s… Well, even in a country like my own here in Holland, I said some nasty things first, but basically one of the good sides of the Dutch is that they are very disobedient people. So ultimately, they won’t obey. Even the people who now were tricked into having the vaccination are now coming around and saying, well, we now are being asked to do a booster shot, and we don’t want to become a target for pharmaceutical industry. These are ideas now that are beginning to brew among the silent majority that at first was willing to submit to government dictates.

Geopolitics & Empire:

Yeah. You’re book gives me hope in the sense you’re saying that all of this technology hasn’t quite yet come together to do what they really want to do, so that’s hopeful. And you also write about the IT revolution and how it essentially comes from the military, DARPA, Pentagon, pretty much everything we use today, hardware and software. I mean, I was surprised you pointed out how even LCD screens that we’re using right now and touch screens are products of military research. Nobody thinks about this, and they’ve taken all of their little gadgets and software for granted, and they view this technology as benign, but really we’re dealing with weapon systems, and it seems these systems are now being targeted at us by the ruling oligarchy.

Something interesting you also talk about are politics, how the left and right lines have blurred, the oligarchy has broadened the center and situated itself there, that there’s little difference today between Democrat, Republican, except that perhaps the democratic party, at least in the US, seems to be currently the defacto home of the oligarchy, and you say the target of state power is the progressive movement. I personally also see a hard attack on conservatives with this de-platforming. They’re canceling people’s bank accounts, putting them on no fly lists and so on. Could you speak about how the elites have kind of reorganized power and party lines? And this is a global trend in many countries.

Kees van der Pijl:

Yeah. Yeah. Well, again, we shouldn’t think of the elites here as a force which is able to direct this like a film director. I mean, the fact that the left has been incorporated into the broad center is basically something that has been autonomously achieved by the formerly left forces, so by the groups that emerged from the industrial labor movement, which has remained without an answer to the relocation of actual industry to Asia or wherever. So I live in a country which has been de-industrialized. France is being de-industrialized. You can’t believe it. This was one of the industrial world leaders, and now there’s less and less any meaningful work being done there in that respect.

So the left lost its base, but in self-reflecting on that process and adjusting their view of how a society could be transformed to a more just, what I would call socialist society, but based on the information revolution, no longer on the industrial revolution, they didn’t do that. They simply let the process go, and they basically were corrupted by the political process itself. I always think that just as capitalism will disappear as an economic system, along with it will disappear the political parliamentary representative system operated by professional politicians whose mandates are renewed by elections and so on.

So that illustrates that the ruling class didn’t have to do anything to get the left to forget about its own history and its prospects and whatever, they did that themselves. It was largely part of unreflected objective processes of the industrialization, and not doing anything about it, not thinking about it, what does this mean for us, what does it mean for us as a political tradition, how do we rejuvenate our stake in the whole process of social development? Now, the center was always the center, it’s still the center, of course, except that it moved to the right. And by right, I mean authoritarian politics, inequality politics, destroying the environment, not so much by CO2 or something, but by say of pollution, cutting trees.

Our energy sources are now basically trees cut from North America, from Russia, from the Baltic countries, et cetera. Every day, enormous ships arrive here in Amsterdam and Rotterdam with [inaudible 00:35:45] which contain not just the trees, but also all the life that was happening in between these trees, so to speak. And these ecological disasters are going on all as part of the unraveling of a functioning economic system. But I think… Well, I’ve lost where we were now.

Geopolitics & Empire:

Yeah. I was just going to say that other guests of mine have echoed as well the same sentiments where you mentioned, when capitalism goes, I guess it’s going, democracy will go as well, and that we’re entering into a period of… Well, it’s still yet to be defined, but authoritarian period where there isn’t democracy, technocracy, biopoliticxs, or maybe a more optimistic future that’s up to us to fight for.

There’s a fascinating tidbit in your book about how “shortly after taking office, Kofi Annan signed an agreement with the World Economic Forum in Davos, linking the UN Secretariat to an electronic communication system welcome that put him and his staff in direct contact with a number of government leaders and with the directors of the World Bank and other international financial institutions, and that effectively the UN system became subordinated to the Western Bloc and transnational corporations.”

And you describe what I call COVID1984 as a global project of which the individual states are mostly the relays and [inaudible 00:37:30] commander, Klaus Schwab, as I call him, as the secretary of the project or a series of overlapping projects. It’s pretty mind-boggling the coordination that they have at the global scale to carry out what they’ve been carrying out over the last two years, trying to impose their wills upon virtually all nation states. And we’ve seen different states here in Mexico from the local level, because our president, AMLO, at least from the federal level, it has not been possible to implement a lot of these policies, but they’ve gone to mayors and governors, gotten to them somehow, and one state has tried to implement these biosecurity policies and has failed, another has tried, and they’ve been having some success, and it’s just this back and forth, two steps forward, one step back. Could you comment a bit about the mechanisms of how they’re able to do this globally, what they’ve done so far?

Kees van der Pijl:

Yeah. Well, you mentioned Kofi Annan and the UN, don’t forget that this was already in the 1980s. So the attack on the UN system has the potential grid on which an alternative world economy might have been built, occurred under Thatcher and Reagan. So there’s a permanent struggle going on on the international level in which the forces of internationalization and international organization are battling over whether they will articulate the aspirations of large parts of the world population, or whether they will impose authority on that population. So in that sense, the mechanism and global class struggle, if you call it like that, already dates back to the Reagan and Thatcher revolution. Neoliberalism was a flight forward out of the class compromises of the post-war period, and in the process made the capitalist system into a world system, but also it made it much more fragile and dependent on any interruption of long product change, on sources of raw materials and so on and so forth.

So in one respect, the COVID scenario, which can be traced back to somewhere around 2000 when the first training exercises were being held about by bioterrorism, although nothing in the way of bioterrorism had ever happened, and as far as I know, didn’t happen since then either, except that we’re now of course experiencing a bioterrorist episode in which governments are deeply involved, but although on the one hand the bioterrorism scenario from 2000 looks fantastically prepared on the one hand, and on the other unique, because there was nothing like it in previous decades, many episodes like for instance the attack on the United Nations already show that the struggle to gain hold, to gain control of the levers of world government, of global governance had already been initiated in the 1980s and ’90s and so on.

And even the attack on state socialism in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union can be understood as in light of the streamlining of the lines of communication between certain centers, and here Bilderberg and Trilateral Commission and the Group of Thirty and so on and so forth are important, not as the seats of Dr. Evil, but as coordination centers, as nerve centers where a lot of ideas about how to go forward come together and are being negotiated among different interests involved, given articulate expression also by these organic intellectuals. People are invited to come and speak at Bilderberg, and also the Bilderberg Group itself and the Trilateral Commission operate, and the World Economic Forum even far more, in a more sophisticated and more expressly developed way, they themselves operate as collective organic intellectuals.

They are think tanks in which ideas are being produced. I mean, I’ve been 50 years in academia, and if you promise not to tell anyone, most of the people that I met were really stupid, whereas compare normal people that I meet, I hardly ever meet stupid people. But in academia, you meet many of them, and yet the ruling class has at its disposal an apparatus so vast that even the stupidity of so many academics is turned into a process of accumulation of extremely sophisticated thought. And it’s a very instructive experience actually, because you would be amazed where these smart thoughts and these deep insights come from if you ever meet one of the people who are deeply involved in the prestigious institutions. I won’t mention my own experiences here, but they are really interesting in that respect.

There are very few… Anyway, let me put it this way. The ideas that a ruling class have to try and impose worldwide regulatory processes, so policies that will work to streamline and to discipline entire continents go back decades, and they have behind them a vast collection of entire libraries of insights and empirical results of how people react to this, how people react to that. In my book, I gave, for instance, the example of this French sociologist of health, Patrick Zylberman, who studied how people experience lockdowns. And if you just read that book, you understand this is a goldmine for anyone who wants to impose a lockdown, because it’s all there.

And it turns out that it indeed worked out broadly along the lines that he predicted on the basis of the SARS one episode in 2003. The one uncertainty that all ruling class projects stumble on is the willingness of a population to be disciplined by such a project, and that justifies my remark just now that academics are often stupid, whereas normal people often, because they rely much more on their intuition and on the sense of is this a right thing to happen or not, rather than on abstruse theories and intellectual fashions-

Geopolitics & Empire:

Yeah, I would confirm that. Because I’ve worked in education as an adjunct professor, and it’s exactly as you describe. And you also mentioned in your book how the urbanites, the urban intellectual elites are kind of like the workforce for the oligarchy, which explains why they are primarily the ones who are buying the official narrative, while the working class is much more skeptical of the narrative. I can’t believe how so many people are buying into the narrative, but that’s what you touch on in the book.

Kees van der Pijl:

Yeah. But don’t forget that when we still had an industrial working class, which was broadly committed to socialist ideals, et cetera, these ideological convictions didn’t arise from inside the people themselves. I mean, they simply listened to their leaders who gave them a plausible story about where we might be heading, why it would be good for us, and so on and so forth. Today if our ministers or parliamentarians are meeting in the [inaudible 00:46:56], there are demonstrators who shout at them that they are Satanists or that they are pedophiles and so on and so forth, and there are a few actually, but if in the 1920s or ’30s or the late 19th century people wouldn’t have had organizations guiding their thinking in a progressive direction, they would also have been shouting all kind of abuse without precisely knowing why they were using these terms and so on and so forth.

So what we’re seeing now in the anomie in the loss of political orientation among so many people, and that in turn makes them vulnerable to government policies like politics of fear in the name of a virus, that their organizations have disappeared. They no longer function as a vanguard or support institutions to give people a sense of what sort of world they are living in, and what might be in it for them in terms of improvement of their faith and a better future for their kids and you name it.

Geopolitics & Empire:

Yeah. And I would just mention as well… I forgot to mention, you talked about how academics are not so smart. And one of the reasons that I started this podcast many years ago was because, while I was working at university, there were a few of my colleagues willing to talk about these subjects that I’m passionate about. And so I’m just like, you know what, I’m going to start a podcast and talk to intellectuals such as yourself, and it grew. And I also wanted to mention that you have a really long section on the book that’s very valuable on the biowarfare aspect.

I was going to mention that you actually referenced multiple times the interview that I did with Francis Boyle back in January of 2020, and also you identify… It gives a lot of detail of the backstory of the 20 years of these pandemic simulations, and you identify the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board which was formed in 2019. And in 2020, I read that document, so people should go check that out. You talk about the Rockefeller [inaudible 00:49:15] agenda. And I remember in March of 2020, I had been interviewed by the popular channel Spiro Skouras, who has since-

Kees van der Pijl:

Yeah, yeah. I’ve seen it. Yeah.

Geopolitics & Empire:

Yeah. He’s since been de-platformed unfortunately multiple times over and placed into a virtual ghetto. He didn’t feel comfortable. I guess he doesn’t do interviews for now anymore, but he asked me back in March of 2020 what was my assessment of what was going on, and I said that it was about global governance, world government, and that they wanted to create algocracy, to rule us by algorithms. And you write about that in your book, that many are seeking to have COVID-19 serve the political interests of a global governance project.

One of the biggest questions we all have… And you touch on it in the book, is that one of the most uncertain factors in the COVID crisis is the relationship between the west, the US in particular and China. You talk about how both Russia and China have submitted to global governance through their membership in the UN and its organizations, and what has occurred is, the internationalization of the state where sovereignty has transferred to the international level from which policy is handed back down to national governments. And then you discuss would China really accept to settle for participating with the west in an ultra-imperialism when the west is evidently declining and plagued by disintegration.

On the one hand, you say the answer is yes, namely the issue of establishing an authoritarian state in which the formerly liberal homelands of capitalism adapt to the Chinese model by simultaneous coups where you leave the inequality untouched, but then we also have a situation where the US, it’s between war, as you mentioned earlier, and cooperative ultra-imperialism. So both options for me are horrific, because also with the latter, the whole world would kind of become edged towards totalitarianism. Could you try to kind of tell us about this US, China relationship in this state of emergency?

Kees van der Pijl:

Well, the more I think about it, the more I think we tend to look at China still too much through the communist lens, to think that… I have many old friends from my own communist party days who still don’t want to hear anything bad about China. They think it’s all Cold War invective, et cetera, but if you look at the chronology of how this crisis came about, and you then reflect back on the number of instances of labor unrest in China itself, many people think of China as a sort of Japanese super factory where everybody’s happily running around in clean coveralls and so on, but that’s not true. There’s a constant process, again, of class formation in the sense that the new working class is being formed from people who will come straight from the land. That process is still not exhausted.

And it’s a general known fact of sociology that the first generation of workers is always the most radical, because they’re not used to the rhythms of long working days and forms of obedience that they were unused to. And if you then look at the statistics of labor incidents in China, that runs into the thousands each year. So for the Chinese ruling class with its president for life now at its head, if the communist party in China convenes, there’s this long endless line of black limousines bringing the billionaires that are a member of the party to the conference hall, but for the Chinese ruling class, the threat of the 1848 that I borrow from [inaudible 00:53:42] as a sort of vision of danger in the near future, for the Chinese ruling class, that’s something very close to home.

They’re not a sort of industrial superpower, smiling at the labor unrest and the resistance against inequality in the west, they themselves are challenged by popular unrest. And it’s the same in Vietnam, it’s the same in Indonesia, which is also under a slightly different system operating this sort of runaway intensive industrialization, destroying its entire natural habitats and so on and so forth. So China in that sense is a very important player in the internationalization of the state, much more so than Russia. Also we should realize that a country as vast as China, or Russia, or India is never a single entity.

I mean, these in themselves are complexes of social forces boiling with difference of interest, with all kinds of struggles and so on. So the people who are… You mentioned this Global Preparedness Monitoring Board. The Chinese… What is he? Head of the Chinese Medical Association, [Dr. Gao 00:55:14], who is there, doesn’t speak for China as a whole. There will be large and powerful groups in China itself. I read the books of [inaudible 00:55:28], a bit of an outsider, Chinese intellectual, very interesting book about the history of China, the history of Chinese thought, et cetera, and he emphasizes that what we see as popular uprisings, like in 1989, [inaudible 00:55:46] uprising were also…

Of course they’re not something else, but were also struggles within the ruling elite in China between groups that wanted to go for a full neoliberal makeover of China, and groups that wanted to retain veto, or at least substantial power for the state class or the class that isn’t on top because of its private property, but that is on top on account of its hold of the state operators, which is something that you see in Iran, that you see in Russia, and that of course has a long prehistory to it. I call that a contender state, a state which from the top down tries to replicate what a more powerful liberal west has already achieved at that point.

And today, China and Russia still retain many characteristics of that contender state model, although at the same time, as you said, they are also part of the internationalized state. I mean, in the Global Preparedness, et cetera, Board, there was also the Russian minister of health, people who have closely looked at, for instance, interlocking directories among corporations and who really know who is on that board, and rather than just drawing the lines and counting them, very often say, but if you take this or that man or woman, and you forget that he was never there, that sort of thing.

And it might well be that in the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board… For instance, the Russian minister of health hardly played a role, for instance. That would be my personal hypothesis before I hear from somebody who really knows about it, whether that was true or not. But in that light, you have to look at these things. The impetus for a round of disciplining of the world population comes from the west. But China is another major force in the process. And if you look at the chronology, you might even say that they had a more urgent need now to already start the process. But that is something that I simply don’t have the knowledge to judge, but I wouldn’t be surprised if… As I say, after the meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos in January 2020, Tedros of the World Health Organization traveled to China, first of all.

Now that was not for medical reasons, there were 10 cases or something, but simply to confer on the basis of what he had been listening to at the Davos meeting, to confer with China what would their position be. And then you got the Wuhan lockdown. Now, every veterinarian will tell you that there’s no point in lockdowns to get to a zero COVID situation, because animals also store this virus, they allow it to reproduce. So you would have to kill all the cats and the dogs. And actually, they inoculated the animals in the London zoo. Have you seen that?

Geopolitics & Empire:

No. With COVID?

Kees van der Pijl:

Images of lions and a rhino and a kangaroo all being inoculated with Pfizer and Moderna serums. In itself, a correct step if you want to get at zero COVID, but that’s simply impossible. Anyway, you can root out Smallpox, but you can’t root out a respiratory virus. They’re everywhere and everywhere. And actually, you are in a much better health if you are constantly exposed to them, because then your immune system remains in top shape, whereas now what we’re seeing here in Holland and I guess everywhere else is that, because of the distancing and the mouth caps and so on, there are nastier forms of flu and some very serious…

Geopolitics & Empire:

They tell us natural immunity doesn’t exist, but this kind of makes me think, I think you cite Orwell’s 1984 in your book where Orwell writes, in the past, ruling groups of all countries did fight against one another. In our own day, they are not fighting against one another at all. The war is waged by each ruling group against its own subjects, and the object of the war is to keep the structure of society intact. For me, that seems like what’s happening now. And you beg the question, are we witnessing the consolidation of a universal oligarchic collectivism, as Orwell used the term, a truce between ruling classes holding their own populations captive in the nominal state of war. So is that what you think could be going on?

Kees van der Pijl:

Well, certainly what they’re trying. Because while you’re saying this, I become more optimistic in the sense that I almost have to laugh, because I realize it doesn’t stand a chance. A year ago, it did, but now… Don’t forget that one thing I mentioned in the book is that, in January, 2021, the Financial Times on its front page reported that the Edelman PR firm, which was closely involved in the preparation of the pandemic as a political project, came to the conclusion that the project to create a shock that everybody would have been paralyzed by, and then be inoculated and so on and so forth, that chance had passed and that the project had failed. Now, if a company like that which is so deeply involved in the whole process of setting it up, of writing the scenario, so to speak… They really were a major force.

If they come to the conclusion after almost a year it has failed, we should feel optimistic. That doesn’t mean that what is happening now to children and to young people, but also to old people dying in complete solitude with their partners somewhere standing outside in the car park, that as a human tragedy, that doesn’t happen now on a scale we haven’t seen before, except in destructive wars like the Eastern Front and second world war. So that is happening, and we can’t undo that, but the project as such is doomed to fail. And what is being repeated here over and over again, and what German lawyer, Reiner Fuellmich, with his committee is preparing, is a tribunal to call all the politicians and all those who were somehow involved in this gigantic fraud, to call and to let them be responsible for what they did and to call it to justice.

Geopolitics & Empire:

You mentioned the contender states of Russia and China, and we’re seeing now this insane escalation in Ukraine, do you think… As you said, maybe the political COVID project is failing. Maybe they try as a diversion, or maybe… I feel like we’re in the 1920s, 1930s. Well, you referenced World War I scenario, as well as the 1930s again, this rise of authoritarianism, economic collapse. Do you think that the west could push for a war with Russia and China?

Kees van der Pijl:

Well, however mad they may be, a war in the present… I mean, the Orwell statement that wars are no longer between states, but against a population could also be a bit reassuring, because then you could say, well, we might as well win that war and not let them. But of course it’s still possible that simply out of an accident in a highly tense situation you might get a larger conflict, and once one of the parties in a major central war is losing, they will resort to their nuclear weapons, and then of course we’re all doomed. So in that sense, it’s important to watch and to read defense journals and see to what extent top military figures are either taking the threat of nuclear annihilation serious, or are belittling it.

And in the 1980s, for instance, you had such a situation in which the Reagan team thought that if you just dug deep enough a hole in the ground, you might survive a nuclear attack, that sort of thing. And that led the nuclear winter report to show that the earth would become a dead place, irrespective of the actual explosion. So apart from top military men and the occasional woman becoming really crazy, they would understand that we should never do more than a proxy war. Ukraine is a very complex… I actually wrote a book about the new Cold War in Ukraine in 2018, so I’m a bit familiar with the situation. And it’s a failed state, and that in itself is a very dangerous situation, because…

Well, it would drift away from our topic if we go into that, but it’s possible that there would be a proxy war with Ukrainians on the one side and the people in the [inaudible 01:06:27] on the other hand, but what I suspect is that… Already in the book that I wrote in 2018, I mentioned that there would be a resurgence of the not really pro-Russian population, but the population that’s oriented towards Russia language and culture and everything, internet, and it would seem now that people have become so desperate in Ukraine because of the ongoing impoverishment and the rapaciousness of the oligarchs there that they are willing to give a pro-Russian politician a chance again.

And that will then in the west be construed as a seizure of power by Russian agents and so on and so forth that [inaudible 01:07:19] serious situation. But the basic point is this, [inaudible 01:07:24] in the west, so a ruling class in the west and the governing class and so on can no longer govern through an equitable social contract with the population. They have to maintain themselves by politics of fear to really drive people with their backs against the wall.

That can be environmental disasters, that can be a war situation, et cetera, but that’s an objective [inaudible 01:07:51]. What it will be depends not on you or me, or even a genius who can foretell these things, but on the objective strength of the different forces and some coincidences here and there. But the politics of fear is a given, so the fight for democracy would always have to focus on discovering the origins of the politics of fear, exposing the forms it takes, exposing the lies that are woven around all kinds of policies that actually aim for something completely different, basically for the subjection of all the people, and then try and aim for something beyond the current economic system that we have.

But that’s not so easy, because don’t forget that even in the days of industrial socialism, the actual ideas that were available prior to the taking of power were minimal. There were very few book-length exposes of what a socialist society would look like, and now there’s nothing. There are a lot of activities.

I’m active here in Holland as well as a speaker in this anti-COVID measures movement, and every time I get somewhere, I’m amazed to see the level of preparation that people have already in terms of setting up alternative education, schools to have alternative food supply chains based on local farming, do your own farming, that sort of thing. Now that’s not the same as having an alternative society ready, but it indicates and it works as a school to shape people’s understanding of their own capacity to contribute meaningfully to society, and that at some point might become a critical factor in social change. But inevitably, it will be different in different countries.

Geopolitics & Empire:

Yeah. You kind of answered my final question of what do we do, and as you said, getting involved… And we’re seeing an explosion in the homeschooling and the building of these parallel economies, parallel structures, which could lead to a more positive future. Is there any final thought then you wish to leave us with?

Kees van der Pijl:

Well, as you said, I just gave it. Well, I think the most important thing is that we keep our brains working, we get as much exposure of interesting ideas on all sides as we can, and that people like yourself keep interviewing as many people you think have some ideas about where we should be going as you can. Thank you very much for it.

Geopolitics & Empire:

And you are on Twitter. I would encourage people to find you there. Is that the best place to follow you, and how can people best support your work or get your new book?

Kees van der Pijl:

Well, they should get the book in all modesty. It’s doing very well here in Holland and in Germany where it was first… And now it will come out in Polish at the end of this month, and in Russian at the end of this month, and also I’m now negotiating with a publisher in France. My view is that if the whole COVID circus collapses… And it will this year, or next year at the latest, then the sort of book that I wrote will be very useful to answer the question, why did it happen in the first place? And that should be enlightening.

It’s not an adventure story about how this all came about, but it’s a reconstruction by accident almost written in the process that it was imposed itself. So I was lucky with this book. Sometimes things fall in place just in a nice way that you feel it could. And it’s also good that I’m out of academia, because when I would’ve still been in academia, the footnotes section would have been twice as long just to show that I really know what I’m talking about, but as now, the emphasis was really on the account of what happened, and then the necessary references.

Geopolitics & Empire:

Yeah. There’s a lot of censorship at university. And also, this could be a future warning to help us understand so we stop this in it’s tracks if they try to pull something like this again. For listeners, you know that I do not that often say this about my guests and their books, but I really mean it, and I do really mean that you have to get Kees book. I received a free review copy from Clarity Press, but still I went out and I bought the book. And so please support great work like this. Professor van der Pijl, thank you for being on Geopolitics & Empire.

Kees van der Pijl:

Thank you very much.

(read more)

Worldwide Exclusive: Embalmers Find Veins & Arteries Filled with Never Before Seen Rubbery Clots

[...] I got a text of images from Pierre Kory. He asked me to guess what he sent.

I thought they were images from Ryan Cole.

Nope.

He said these were from an embalmer and referred me to Lt. Col. Theresa Long who knows the embalmer.

Funeral Director and embalmer Richard Hirschman reveals, for the first time ever, arteries and veins filled with unnatural blood clot combinations with strange fibrous materials that are completely filling the vascular system. He has gone from seeing 50% of his embalmed cases with these types of blockages rise to almost 80%. It only started happening after the vaccines were rolled out.

This doesn’t happen to everyone. Only those who die after vaccination. So he can tell who was vaccinated.

This tells you everything you need to know. (watch video and read more)

Truth or Covid? (or, “why we know everything they’re telling us is a lie”)

Remember the good old days at the beginning of the COVID coup – before the new dogmas started to tangle themselves into self-contradictory knots?

Back then, if you wanted to know what to think, the Infallible Ones always had simple answers.

What was the enemy? A virus called SARS-CoV-2. Where did it come from? Chinese bats and pangolins. When would it end? After a few weeks of “lockdown” and the introduction of “vaccines.”

How did you protect yourself from it in the meantime?

By isolating yourself at home, wearing a muzzle, obsessively washing your hands, leaving your shoes outside the door, avoiding other human beings, scrubbing the walls and counters – above all, by obeying whatever orders the Infallible Ones gave you.

And if you didn’t obey? You would die.

But “oh, what a tangled web we weave,” as the poet said, “when first we practice to deceive.”

The Infallible Ones’ teachings were soon mired in baffling inconsistencies. A “few weeks” of lockdown gave way to months, which in turn gave way to threats of recurring confinements whenever the authorities deemed it expedient.

Summertime assurances of the “success” of the national incarceration – which had upended the health care system, educationally crippled a generation of children, and tossed away the livelihoods of millions of innocent people, though the Infallible Ones seldom mentioned any of that – were succeeded by “expert” scoldings to the effect that we Americans had been too selfish to be confined at all.

When randomized clinical trials proved that face masks were useless, the Infallible Ones told us to wear two masks instead of one.

When the Infallible Ones abandoned the canard of “asymptomatic transmission” – after it had fulfilled its function of stoking public hysteria – they adopted the equally silly canard that “the unvaccinated” were unique breeding grounds for viral mutations.

Even the virus itself, which the Infallible Ones had originally pronounced so unique, became the very opposite of unique as the Infallible Ones translated it into an ever-enlarging ensemble of similar viral “strains” in which new ones appeared just often enough to offset the gains supposedly made by the “vaccines.”

And meanwhile – most important of all – what was supposed to be a temporary suspension of constitutional government became a “new normal”; the law, or what had always been the law, turned out to be as obsolete as the idea of dealing with an infectious disease by giving medical treatment to the genuinely sick.

In the world of the “new normal,” anyone who mentioned “civil rights” was hustled off social media and into First Amendment limbo. Democracy was mocked as a reactionary’s pipe dream – when it was mentioned at all.

That’s the record, in brief, of the past two years. And if we have learned anything from this cavalcade of deceit, it is, or should be, that the COVID coup is fundamentally not about medicine or science. It is not about inflated “case” rates or jiggered statistics or fake news or the pseudo-studies circulated by propaganda outfits like the World Health Organization or the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Yes, all those things have figured in the derangement of constitutional democracy that has characterized the COVID coup. But at bottom it’s not about any of them.

The real nature of the campaign is at once simpler and far more dangerous. What we’re experiencing is an attack on the very foundation of ordered liberty, an assault that is already in the process of submerging democracies beneath what the Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben has called a “permanent ‘state of exception.’”

To put it bluntly: our ruling classes, in one country after another, have effectively switched off their nations’ constitutions and the whole set of civil liberties that are supposed to accompany them – not by formally abolishing them, mind you, but by adopting the extra-legal mechanisms of a “state of emergency” in place of normal constitutional procedures, with the result that the ordinary rules of democracy and the rights of individuals have, for most practical purposes, been indefinitely suspended.

That’s why the COVID coup began, in my own country, with declarations of an “emergency” in four-fifths of the states – and why, with very rare exceptions, those “states of emergency” remain in effect to this day, nearly two years later.

Again, this cannot be explained away as a response to a respiratory virus. When an “emergency” involves suspending constitutional government for two years, it should be obvious that the “emergency” has ceased to be a real emergency (if it ever was one) and has become an extralegal norm – and this is even more emphatically true when virtually no one in the political opposition, the civil rights bar or the mainstream media so much as mentions this fundamental fact.

My point is that those of us who recognize what is happening are going to have to shift our tactics. We can no longer attack COVID19 propaganda in piecemeal fashion, challenging one medical falsehood at a time. That approach, I’m afraid, is likely to be self-defeating.

As long as we focus on disproving each particular COVID “narrative,” the Infallible Ones can continue to manage the debate in mass media as a conflict between the interpretations of “experts” and those of “conspiracy theorists.”

And that allows them to skirt the real issue. COVID fascism is not a comedy of scientific errors. For all intents and purposes, it is a coup d’état. And it must resisted accordingly.

Still, if we aren’t going to debunk every lie swirling through mass media or dished out by the “experts,” how can we be sure that we stand on solid factual ground as we resist the coup unfolding all around us – particularly if, as I’m arguing, we must begin by asserting that our struggle is about regaining our freedoms, not about correcting a medical policy?

Actually, there are many reasons we can be sure. And now, as we approach the third year of the coup, I want to offer a short list of them.

1. The COVID coup has consistently relied on unconstitutional methods.

The first and most unmistakable clue about the real nature of the coup is its aggressive destruction of constitutional government.

Right from the start, it involved suspensions of the legislatures; from there it moved quickly to arbitrary rule by executive fiat (mask “mandates” followed by “vaccine passports”), and then indulged head-on in violations of constitutional rights, as in the imposition of mass “quarantines” without a court order – an illegal act even under “emergency” dispensation.

I have argued this in print for over a year and a half, so I won’t belabor the point now except to stress the complicity of mass media in the unprecedented assault on our basic rights. The most important lie, of course, has been one of omission: the press simply never mentions the absence of any constitutional basis for the repeated attacks on freedom.

But I would like to call attention to a small but very revealing lie that crops up every time the press reports a new COVID19-related “order.”

Last month’s story about sweeping new muzzling requirements in California was a case in point. “California is ordering a statewide mask mandate for indoor public spaces,” blared the Los Angeles Times. But “California” does not and cannot issue a “mandate.”

Promulgations of legal requirements belong to the appropriate organs of government – and that means that an honest report would have necessarily told readers how the mandate in question came to be. What body passed the law? Who signed it? Which agency issued the regulation, if it was a regulation, and what was the statutory authority for it to do so?

In my opinion, it was no accident that the Times never informed its readers that the new California “mandate” was a unilateral edict signed by Tomas Aragon, the head of California’s Department of Public Health – an edict that did not even attempt to identify any authority for such an action in California’s statutes or regulatory code.

I repeat: in a constitutional government, health regulations are always grounded in such authority; “mandates” that ignore this are violations of law at best, dictatorial usurpations at worst. And the propagandists in the media, though they know this, obviously do not want you to know it.

The same story – political crime furthered by media complicity – emerges just as clearly from New York’s latest assault on the Nuremberg Code. The fiat recently issued by the state’s dictator – officially, Governor Kathy Hochul – claims to acquire authority for a statewide “vaccine mandate” from New York’s Public Health Law, section 225.

But that statutory section does not address vaccination policy at all – and since the COVID19 “vaccines” do not even prevent person-to-person transmission, there is no legal way the section’s general language about “the preservation and improvement of public health” can be construed to give the state’s governor the power to force 5-year-old children to be injected with experimental drugs, as Ms. Hochul has ordered.

In short, the “governor” – the word really must be put in quotation marks at this point – is acting outside her legal powers. And if we had a political opposition and a functioning court system worthy of the name, she might be facing impeachment instead of routine accolades from the tame “liberal” press, which calls this democracy-wrecking child poisoner “a moderate Democrat.”

Consider, by contrast, the intense debate over the 1985 decision of New York State’s public health council to rewrite its regulations so as to force the closing of gay bathhouses. That decision – taken at the height of the AIDS outbreak – was denounced by liberals at the time and is sharply criticized by students of political history to this day.

Imagine the reaction if New York’s governor had simply written a unilateral order closing all gay bathhouses in the state, thumbing his nose at New York’s legislature and the whole existing regulatory system on the grounds that, in his view, New York faced an “emergency” that justified the suspension of democracy!

But that is exactly what has happened in states across the country – New York and my own state of New Jersey among them – for nearly two years: state executives have issued fiats suspending legal processes on the grounds of a hazily-defined “emergency,” and have followed them up with a series of unilateral decrees that drastically altered the lives of their citizenry – in direct defiance of their states’ constitutions.

You cannot support that and support constitutional democracy at the same time. The propagandists may not like to admit it, but when they sing the praises of mask “mandates,” they are celebrating dictatorship.

And the democracy-busters are everywhere. In New York City, outgoing Mayor Bill DeBlasio slapped a “vaccine mandate” on all municipal employees, topping off the outrage by extending the same requirement to 184,000 private business and organizations.

The mayor’s constitutional authority to order this assault on bodily integrity was so obviously shaky that a local judge promptly stayed his order. But that didn’t bother DeBlasio, who said, “I hope [this measure] will be emulated all over the country because it’s time to get even tougher to end the COVID era.” Got it? When you’re being “tough,” who cares about the law?

2. The one thing no one in the mainstream wants to mention is the biggest thing of all: that our civil liberties are evaporating.

DeBlasio and Hochul are both Democrats, and it’s tempting to focus on the hypocrisy at the leftward end of the mainstream political spectrum. But it’s not just the “liberals” who have betrayed the Bill of Rights.

We’re constantly told that the U.S. Supreme Court is dominated by “conservatives,” but when New York’s rampaging governor decreed that healthcare workers must submit to COVID19 vaccination – even if they have religious objections to the experimental drugs (she claimed personal knowledge that God doesn’t support exemptions for these particular drugs) – only three justices out of nine were prepared to offer any relief.

I don’t always agree with Neil Gorsuch, but the ominous conclusion of his dissenting opinion in that case (Dr. A. v. Hochul) deserves to be committed to memory:

How many, indeed?

Business elites are pursuing the COVID agenda as viciously as the politicians, if not more so. Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, has stated publicly that he will fire every employee in New York who doesn’t submit to the “vaccine” experiment, even those who attempt to work from home.

Wouldn’t it be nice if the erstwhile champions of “free enterprise” actually stood up for freedom when it’s being robbed from the people who work for them? But I don’t see any criticism of Dimon from the business press, which has fallen as silent as the civil-rights crowd.

And please don’t let anyone tell you that these “vaccines” aren’t experimental, or that pressuring people into taking them doesn’t violate the Nuremberg Code’s prohibition against human medical experimentation without informed consent. The case for applying the terms of the Code is simply overwhelming.

As we all know, the drugs in question were rushed through privately-administered trials that did not include the animal testing protocols normally required by the Food and Drug Administration.

The data from those trials – the only ones ever conducted – remain sealed from public view, and we already know from Brook Jackson about serious irregularities in the limited tests performed by the manufacturers while they were conveniently insulated from public view.

That means that these drugs remain untested, and their massive use is the first real experimental trial they have ever had.

In fact, the manufacturers insisted on – and received – blanket legal immunity before they would issue their drugs to the public. This unprecedented action – one that protected the drug makers rather than the public – resulted directly from the manufacturers’ awareness that, given the lack of prior testing, no one could predict the results of the drugs until they had actually been tried out on large numbers of people.

You cannot have it both ways. If you insist that you haven’t safety-tested your products before issuing them – and that’s what Pfizer, Moderna and J&J all did insist when they developed the drugs in 2020 – you can’t deny that the people you inject with them over the following year are participating in an experiment.

Besides, the propagandists themselves are giving away the game: they openly refer to the massive vaccination program now underway as “proof” that the drugs are safe. But this means that they are relying on the results of actual use as a substitute for a clinical trial.

“The vaccine does work,” Dr. Mark Sawyer, who served on the FDA advisory committee that approved the drugs in 2020, told CNBC. “[T]hat’s been clearly shown by both death rates and hospitalization rates when comparing vaccinated people to unvaccinated people.”

Mind you, the propagandists really have no choice about saying this; the United States, like other countries, is actively vaccinating whole groups of people – pregnant women and young children – who were completely excluded from the manufacturers’ trials. But to cite that experience as evidence of the drugs’ safety means – again – that people now getting their jabs are actually being herded into an enormous human medical experiment.

And of course they’re not being told the truth about this.

Human medical experimentation without informed consent is not just another legal lapse. It is a crime against humanity. Think of that when read the next op-ed singing the praises of the “vaccination” campaign.

3. The “facts” fed to the public are manifestly worthless.

Yes, I know: I began this essay with the statement that we can’t fight COVID fascism one lie at a time. But even a quick sampling is enough to confirm – for anyone who still needs proof – that we’re all eye-deep in propaganda so deceitful that none of it can be taken seriously.

Take the latest fear porn to emerge from New York, always a reliable bellwether for gathering trends in COVID19 propaganda.

The day after Christmas, a deafening chorus of mass media belted out a claim of the New York State Health Department that “the number of children hospitalized with COVID-19 is rising” in New York, adding some gloating if irrelevant details about the police-state measures to be imposed on anyone reckless enough to attempt the traditional New Year’s Eve celebration in Times Square.

(For the record, the official harassment included: mandatory muzzles outside as well as inside; required proof of “vaccination” plus personal ID for everyone over 5 years old; a police blockade around the area which banned people from entering until after 3:00 p.m.; and a sharp limit on total crowd size even afterwards. Must have been a delightful party.)

The ghouls responsible for this “alert” clearly wanted us to believe that New York’s children are keeling over in droves from the “deadly virus,” and that if we don’t immediately get every single kid injected with experimental drugs they’re all going to die.

But what does the evidence actually show? Well – nothing.

First, although the headlines made it sound as though all “children hospitalized with COVID-19” were hospitalized because of COVID19, the fine print in the database linked from the articles told a different tale.

In fact, the figures reflected the “number of patients hospitalized, and number of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) among patients with lab-confirmed COVID-19 disease”: in other words, they included all hospitalizations, due to any cause, for patients who had merely generated one positive test result for COVID19 during the relevant period.

Since those tests usually consist of a PCR assay at an unspecified amplification cycle threshold, and since such “tests” are notoriously unreliable, the number of “positive” test results in children hospitalized for causes that included, for all we know, broken arms, strep throat, measles, concussions, etc., tells us virtually nothing about how COVID19 has been affecting New York’s children.

Second, there’s the question of absolute as opposed to relative numbers. How many actual pediatric hospitalizations had occurred in New York when the Health Department sounded its alarm? The ghouls never told us that – and once again, the fine print contradicted their arm-waving headlines.

The Health Department’s press release noted parenthetically that a total of 30 children between 12 and 17 had yielded a positive COVID19 test result in New York hospitals during the preceding week, and that “roughly half” of the total number involved children under 5.

True, that left open the question of how many were between 5 and 11, but I think it’s safe to assume that if children between those ages had been admitted to hospitals in larger numbers than their older contemporaries, the Health Department would have said so.

So let’s say, for argument’s sake, that we’re talking about 60 hospital admissions for children over 5, yielding a week-long total of about 120. Given that there are nearly 4.2 million children in the state of New York, 120 positive tests for COVID19 (via dubious methods) in New York hospitals over a seven-day period hardly seems cause for panic.

And this was just one of a whole string of similar fabrications.

The CDC has been claiming for months that “unvaccinated people who had previously recovered from a coronavirus infection” are “five times as likely to get Covid as people who had received both shots of the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines.”

Because this result directly contradicted a much-publicized study from Israel, I took the trouble to review the actual data. And it turned out that the numbers not only don’t support the CDC’s claim; they demonstrate the exact opposite of what the “experts” claim they do.

Setting to one side the methods used to determine who had “previously recovered” from a COVID19 infection, and to ensure that “vaccinated” subjects had not also previously recovered from such an infection (both of which are questionable), the paper’s authors recorded 6,328 hospitalizations “among fully vaccinated and previously uninfected patients,” while among unvaccinated patients who had previously recovered, the total number of hospitalizations was only 1,020.

Even the small proportions of those patients who subsequently tested “positive” for COVID19 were heavily weighted in favor of the vaccinated: 324 as opposed to 89. Now, take a moment to consider how devastating those numbers are for the claim made by the CDC: namely, that vaccination alone gives you far more protection from COVID19 than natural immunity.

The study’s own data prove this to be a lie.

In fact, if the numbers are taken seriously, they suggest that you are more than six times as likely to be hospitalized after being “vaccinated” than after recovering from a COVID infection – and that you are more than three times as likely to be hospitalized with COVID19. When was the last time you heard that explained in mainstream media?

So don’t waste your time on the latest COVID19 “study” touted in the New York Times to bludgeon more gullible citizens into compliance. Just assume you’re being lied to, and you’ll be right often enough that the exceptions won’t matter.

4. The “experts” cannot be taken seriously.

And then there are the “experts.” How many times do these mouthpieces of the Infallible Ones have to contradict themselves before we stop listening to them?

At first they told us (correctly) that face masks offer no real obstacle to the spread of a respiratory virus. Then, reversing themselves without explanation, they insisted that wearing a mask – any sort of mask – provided an essential layer of protection. (Right on cue, the media set up a howl about “maskless” people being sighted at Trump rallies – or similarly disreputable places – as if they had been caught cavorting down Main Street without any clothes on.)

Now the “experts” have outdone themselves by telling us that if we want real protection, we’ve got to “upgrade” to N95 or KN95 respirator masks. Doesn’t that mean that they’ve been lying to us for over a year and a half when they assured us that wearing a cloth or paper mask was the submissive citizen’s way of “doing his part”? Of course it does, but don’t expect the mainstream press to raise that uncomfortable question.

And what about the “vaccines”? When those experimental drugs were first released, I was one of many critical writers who observed that the two-shot regime demanded by the authorities was only the beginning: that soon we’d be ordered to have a third shot, then a fourth, and that eventually we’d be told that “real” vaccination was an unending process, like the “new normal” itself. Nonsense, scoffed the Infallible Ones.

But now Anthony Fauci himself is saying that the very definition of “fully vaccinated” is up for grabs, so that “it’s going to be a matter of when, not if,” that definition changes. Take a moment to wrap your mind around the enormity of this idea.

In the future, your medical status won’t be based on objective facts but on the arbitrary pronouncements of the powers that be.

No matter which shots you’ve had, or how many, or how recently, or whether you’re sick, or likely to become sick, or what sort of antibodies you’ve got, or what medical treatments you have or haven’t undergone in the past, if Dr. Fauci and his fellow ghouls decide to rewrite the definition of “vaccinated” you may find yourself suddenly among that demonized underclass that, according to the editorialists of the New York Times, are responsible for all the world’s troubles.

And when that happens, there won’t be anything you can do about it except to obey the latest orders of the Infallible Ones. Not even your “vaccine pass” will help you.

So it’s not even a matter of the experts constantly contradicting themselves, feeding us one false story after another – though of course they’ve done that. Now they’ve taken Newspeak to an altogether different level, arrogating to themselves the power to change the meanings of actual medical terms.

In the future there won’t be any contradictions from the experts because, whenever they find it convenient, the experts will simply redefine a word or two in order to render their past pronouncements consistent with their current ones.

And who are these “experts”? Most media reports about COVID19 statistics cite the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, directly or indirectly, as their key source of information. But they rarely mention that Johns Hopkins’ coronavirus information arm is funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies and the Stavros Niarchos Foundation, both of which have significant ties to the pharmaceuticals industry – a fact that should have disqualified it long ago as a source of “objective” data.

As for the Center for Health Security itself, I have pointed out in a previous article its close links with the American Enterprise Institute, the folks who led the way to the Iraq invasion of 2003.

The lies behind that invasion unraveled pretty quickly. But that was because the propagandists at AEI were careless enough to make claims – mostly about Iraqi “weapons of mass destruction” – that could be publicly verified.

Their partners at Johns Hopkins have been more discreet: when they claimed there would be “no summertime lull” in 2020, insisting that COVID19 deaths were not seasonal and that lockdowns would continue, off and on, for “several years,” those lies could be explained away afterward as over-pessimistic projections – projections that might still come true, for all we know, if everyone doesn’t obey Big Brother.

(By the way, I’m not the only one to notice the disturbing history of the blandly-named Center for Health Security. The German lawyer Paul Schreyer has detailed its long-term involvement in bioterror “simulations” at which subjects like the imposition of martial law and other police-state tactics have often been discussed by the high-level participants.)

So these high-profile “experts” are nothing but the lying professional mouthpieces of a lying political class.

Do you really need to know more about them?

5. The COVID coup involves a radical redefinition of human value.

Finally, we must realize that the perversions of the past two years have not only been political and legal. The Infallible Ones have been tampering with basic terms of humanity and morality – and that should have all of us up in arms.

Let’s start with the obvious. A policy that deliberately discourages doctors from treating sick patients – that, in fact, causes the deaths of countless people who could otherwise have been saved – is not a medical policy at all; it is a crime.

Yet this was exactly the policy pursued by Fauci, the CDC and the National Institutes of Health, which for nearly two years did their level best to prevent the use of empirically-proven therapies for COVID19.

As a result, according to Dr Scott Atlas (whose dissenting voice on Trump’s Coronavirus Task Force was generally buried under noisy media slanders), “urgently needed clinical trials by the NIH and FDA were never performed,” while “[i]n another unprecedented move, doctors were blocked from prescribing [hydroxychloroquine], even though prescribing any other approved drug for an off-label use was routine.”

And anyone who tried to tell the truth on social media about drugs like hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin was likely to run head-on into social media censorship.

But the evil runs even deeper than that. Today we are being sold a premise never before embraced by a civilized society: the notion that every human being is a public menace by definition, that people are sick until proven healthy and dangerous until proven otherwise, that the mere act of breathing – that is, of living – requires some sort of moral and political justification. And the terms of that justification can only be determined by the powers that be; you and I are not given a say in what relieves us of the status of a public danger.

Just consider how radically incompatible such an idea is with any sort of open or democratic society. If people are defined as public menaces, how can they simultaneously constitute the ultimate public authority – a status that is the defining characteristic of a democracy? How can enemies of the people be “the people”?

If a human being’s right to breathe (unless he’s been injected with experimental drugs, wears a muzzle and doesn’t write anything objectionable on social media) may be arbitrarily curtailed, what rights can a human being possibly be said to possess? It hardly needs to be said that the traditional notion of “citizenship” is no longer intelligible in such a context.

Meanwhile, we must be honest with ourselves. No political party is going to save us from the COVID coup. In the U.S., with rare exceptions, Republicans are sniping at their rivals about “cultural” issues and ignoring the most massive attack on freedom in modern American history. And even when the incumbent Democrats do badly at the polls, they stubbornly refuse to get the point.

A “half-dozen Democratic governors” recently told Politico what they thought the trouble was: “The party,” they said, “needs to find a message that acknowledges voters’ exasperation with the virus and its economic and societal impacts.”

Such comments tell us all we need to know about these professional frauds, who still hope we’ll believe that “the virus” closed our businesses, stole our performing arts, wrecked our health care, tortured our kids and turned loose a batch of untested drugs on our immune systems, with more mandatory shots on the way even as the death toll of this ghastly experiment rises and rises.

But of course “the virus” didn’t do any of that. The bosses did. And if we don’t stop them, they’ll go right on doing it.

And if we needed any more evidence of just how much is at stake, we got it this month from a major life insurance company in Indiana, which announced as the new year began that “the death rate is up a stunning 40% from pre-pandemic levels among working-age people” between 18 and 64 years old.

This “unheard of” increase cannot be attributed to COVID19; the insurance executives themselves say that death rates have sharply declined for that illness.

What then? Might the soaring death rates have something to do with the “vaccines” that have been foisted on hundreds of millions of Americans? Or the health consequences of police-state tactics that have ravaged our society? It’s high time we demanded answers to those questions.

With what methods? Addressing fellow academics on December 8, Giorgio Agamben questioned whether it made sense any longer “to fight or act in the name of principles and concepts such as democracy, the constitution, law” and so forth; after all –

“New” in this context does not have to mean unprecedented. We are accustomed to limiting ourselves to a secular political vocabulary. But when the essence of humanity is under assault, we need to think of other and more basic sorts of expression.

What we’re engaged in is a spiritual struggle. It’s a battle for the survival of the human soul, and in that battle our main weapons are likely to be spiritual ones: courage, hope, self-sacrifice, faith.

Remember, the enemies of humanity have a weak point: they do not believe in human beings, and consequently they do not understand the power contained in each soul that refuses to be duped.

Listen to any of their recent pronouncements, and you will notice at once that the Infallible Ones think that they are talking to children. “How to Think About Covid Data Right Now,” reads an actual headline in the New York Times for January 7 – as if it were perfectly natural for the Times to teach its readers “how to think.”

But I suspect that far more people are offended by such condescension than the Times and its fellow propagandists have yet realized. And woe to the swindler who underestimates his mark!

The propagandist who believes he is lying to children might do well to recall one famous man’s warning to the effect that “it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.”

But I will leave my readers to draw their own conclusions about this. (read more)

Tucker Carlson Interviews Freedom Convoy Spokesman, Trucker Benjamin Dichter

World’s Richest Man Supports the Canadian Freedom Convoy

Isolating at Home, a Cowardly Canadian Prime Minister Attempts to Avoid Ottawa Protest

Justin Trudeau Accuses Freedom Convoy Supporters of Wrongthink, “Fringe Minority, Holding Unacceptable Views”

Canadian Trucker Freedom Convoy Is Likely the World’s Largest Vehicle Convoy in History

The Canadian Government Announce They Will Not Budge on Vaccine Mandate for Truckers

Report: Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer Retiring [Conditionally]

Biden has promised to fill a vacancy with a Black woman.

Multiple major media outlets are reporting that Justice Stephen Breyer will be retiring at the end of this term in June. That would open a vacancy for Joe Biden to fill without risking losing the Senate in the 2022 midterms.

Breyer has been the subject of a Democratic pressure campaign for him to retire while a Democrat is in office and Democrats control the Senate, unlike Justice Ginsburg whose vacancy was filled by Trump (with Amy Coney Barrett). We covered the pressure campaign in June 2021, Democrats Renew Push for Justice Stephen Breyer to Retire.

Biden made a promise to fill a vacancy with a Black woman.

The promise was repeated after the election:

We covered the likely contenders in Here Come The Biden Judges, Including His Likely Eventual SCOTUS Nominee.

Breyer said he doesn’t want his retirement to appear political, but if it is true that he won’t leave until a successor is confirmed, then it’s highly political. Breyer would be making a vacancy open to Democrats, but will avoid a vacancy if for some reason a nominee is not confirmed before the midterms.

Wolf reports that Biden and Breyer will announce this as early as tomorrow. And Breyer won’t leave until a nominee is confirmed

— Manu Raju (@mkraju) January 26, 2022

(read more)

The DC Rally and the Rise of the Resistance

By long American tradition, protest movements manifest themselves most fully in gatherings in Washington, D.C, starting at the Washington Monument and culminating in speeches at the Lincoln Memorial. At long last, after two years of astonishing attacks on fundamental rights that most everyone once believed were protected by the U.S. Constitution, this happened today, January 23, 2022.

It didn’t just happen actually. It wasn’t spontaneous. It was paid for, planned, organized, put together, and broadcast on online media. There was nothing but sincere love of what we used to call liberty behind these efforts. The speakers, organizers, and people who showed up took huge risks in order to salvage what is left of the Founders’ vision. They deserve every credit for this. Bless them.

The enduring question is: why did it take so long? Why did people not pour out into the streets on March 13, 2020, when the government first issued its lockdown directives that were put into place the next week and lasted for months after? How is it possible that governments around the country could have locked up the churches on Easter 2020, smashed 100K-plus small businesses, and kept many schools closed for the better part of two years and yet protests against lockdowns were few, far between, and mostly unattended?

Let us not forget that “social distancing” rules were structured to “keep people separate,” in the words of the crank doctor Deborah Birx who concocted all these protocols and talked Trump into accepting them. Combined with capacity restrictions, they amounted to a ban on public meetings. In many states, you could not gather with more than 10 people. This was enforced by the police and cheered by mainstream media.

So let us not be too hard on people for not living a life of utter defiance. In addition, in those days, people were utterly shell-shocked. They feared not only the virus (which data had already shown was not a threat to most people of working age) but aIso arrest, doxxing, and shaming. The George Floyd protests got the green light from the same institutions, so people used the occasion to let off steam, but that light quickly turned red thereafter.

The lockdowns gradually mutated into another attack on basic freedoms. The vaccines seemed like they might emancipate us from the panic and tyrannies but the beast of tyranny had already been unleashed. What seemed like a promising way of dealing with a disease revealed itself to be an unprecedented attack on individual choice and biology. People who have not complied have seen their lives utterly upended.

Meanwhile, in the midst of this whole trajectory of decline, the harms multiplied seemingly without limit, affecting every aspect of life quality for people of all ages. The political establishment and public-health officials have been stunningly obtuse, refusing to apologize and often only doubling down on the insanity, even though everyone knows they are lying. To everyone’s amazement, Big Tech and Big Media have not only gone along but allowed themselves to be enlisted in what amounted to a war against life and liberty.

So, yes, after two years, we finally have it, the DC protest we’ve long needed. I very much admire the speakers for keeping their composure in the midst of all this. After all, do we really need to explain that something has gone fundamentally wrong? Is it not unbearably obvious that we’ve been lied to, abused, and played very hard by a fascist-style regime that is utterly foreign to American ideals, institutions, history, and aspirations? We should not have to, but we do, and with the eyes of the world watching.

Many of the speeches spoke not only to the vaccine mandates but to the lockdowns, which seem perhaps like ancient history, but which are very much present day with cultural, economic, and public-health damage that has been inflicted.

The spirit of the event was striking. It was diverse in terms of religion, ideology, and demographics. The theme of every speech centered on that beautiful word freedom, even if there were a range of different perspectives heard from the microphones. And surely, freedom is a theme on which everyone can agree. And surely most people, once it is explained, understand that a medicinal mandate of limited public utility and questionable safety, as a condition for participation in public life or even for getting paid for one’s job, is contrary to the ideal of freedom.

Why, then, were not millions present at this rally? Yes, there should have been. My answer: because this is not 1963. Consider:

• D.C. has a vaccine mandate in place, so anyone not vaccinated, or anyone who refuses to participate in the new segregation, would have to stay and eat across the borders in Maryland or Virginia. 

• We live in very dangerous times when social-media trolls can wreck your life if you are targeted by them: showing up to an edgy, anti-regime protest in D.C. is very likely to enliven them. 

• Facial recognition technology allows anyone with a camera, including the major media, to capture a pic of any face and identify and discover everything there is to know about you, which means basically that there is no privacy anymore in public spaces. 

• The media had already spent days pre-reporting the event and characterizing it as a bunch of Trump-deluded anti-vaccination activists with dangerous associations with unseemly ideological movements. 

• Plane travel these days is a huge pain in the neck, with loudspeakers endlessly blaring patronizing messages about masking and social distancing, and filled with threats that non-compliers will have their lives ruined. 

• Plus, anyone could watch and listen to the speeches from laptops at home instead of braving the very cold weather. 

• The corporate media has spent the better part of a year doxxing and smearing absolutely anyone who showed up to the January 6, 2021, pro-Trump rally at the Capitol even if they didn’t participate in the unruly entry into the building. They all became and remain suspects to this day. Do you really want to protest in DC?

Given all this, it strikes me as remarkable and a sign of great strength that several thousand people managed to show at all. And while anyone can criticize this speaker or that, this line in a speech or that, I’m reluctant to do so simply because I have no idea of the herculean effort it would require to organize something on this scale and the anxiety that would be associated with all the landmines planted in such a terrain. 

My attitude is: respect for those who did this. 

The question is: for every person in attendance, how many people did they represent? I hope that every person there represents one million more. Ten million more. I do not see that as entirely implausible. We needed this rally if only as a show of what could be. And the overarching spirit, what was it? It was the most fundamental thing, the aspiration for simple freedom. That is what is at stake. It’s more important than ideology, partisanship, religion, race, or any of the other things that previously divided us. 

When foundational postulates of civilization itself are sweeping to destruction, what do we do? We do what we can in every way that is possible. If that means organizing a rally, or slogging to D.C., or pulling up an app to watch it on TV, great. Or maybe it means donating to a good organization like Brownstone. Or perhaps saying no whenever or wherever it is possible to do so. We are out of the habit of resistance, but if there is another way to fight against the end of human rights, I do not know it. (read more)

What I Saw at the DC Rally

It’s time for me to come clean. I attended the Defeat The Mandates rally in Washington D.C. I estimate there were about 10,000 people there, one person I spoke with said he’d put it closer to 25,000. Either way the turnout will be ridiculed as pathetic and your trusted nightly news talking heads will gleefully describe it as a massive failure of “right-wing, dangerous anti-vaxxers, Nation of Islam demagogues, and the mis-led nephew of Camelot trying to get Americans killed!” If they report on it at all.

Of course that’s what they’ll say. That’s all they can say. Because the things that were discussed today are things every American needs to discuss, and which our trusted news anchors do not seem to want you to hear. Things like informed consent, risk-benefit analyses, outpatient treatment, vaccine injuries, and the Bill of Rights.    

The comedian J.P. Sears opened with a stirring admonition to love each other above all. To remember to protest peacefully and to embrace the differences between us: Democrat, Republican, Vaccinated, Not, Young, Old. Well, not very many young, to be honest. A few little ones with their parents, but surprisingly few if any college students or yuppies.

We heard from a coalition of medical doctors and PhD’s all heavily credentialed in their fields, with messages of caution, delivered with genuine pathos. We heard from Dr. Aaron Kheriaty—the Chief Ethicist of University of California-Irving until last December, when he was fired for not wanting a vaccine post-COVID recovery—imploring us to remember the words of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn about how freedom slips away. “We didn’t love freedom enough…We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

We heard from Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Pierre Kory who reminded us of the needless deaths we have endured due to the obstruction of doctors trying to practice medicine. Lest we accuse them of hyperbole, we also heard from Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Mary Talley Bowden who have recently lost their jobs over this very obstruction. Drs. Marik and Talley Bowden refused to follow precisely the prescribed protocols for treating COVID-19 which their medical systems demanded and instead used treatments they believed were more efficacious. For this desire to follow their instincts and decades of experience, they lost their jobs. Fear not, says Dr. Talley Bowden for she is suing Houston Methodist and is going to bring them down.

We heard from Dr. Robert Malone, MD, who many of you have either heard on Joe Rogan, or complained about other people hearing on Joe Rogan. Dr. Malone touched on several things—including his plea not to vaccinate children due to safety concerns—and indeed his primary theme was fatherly, he encouraged all of us to strive to inculcate internally three qualities in this pivotal moment: integrity, dignity, and community.

We heard from Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a reviled vaccine skeptic with a royal pedigree. Oddly enough, for a man who was born into “the elite” and could be spending his time on a Greek island sipping Assyrtiko and eating octopus, laughing at our suffering, he seemed to have a near-fanatical obsession with the importance of the United States Constitution. He explained with startling clarity that we’ve been undergoing a “controlled demolition of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.” That in fact, there is no clause which allows for the closing of churches while liquor stores remain open, nor for the infringement on the rights of property owners i.e. small business owners who were forced to close. He said, “There is no pandemic exception. There is no war exception. There is no any exception.”

He explained in great detail how the limited data from the Pfizer trial that has been released already casts doubt on the efficacy of the vaccine when one computes for absolute risk as opposed to relative risk. I am not a statistician, but the work sounds compelling, worthy at least of review.

Bobby Jr. spoke of the impending threat of a global surveillance state, anchored to digital health passports, through which every aspect of your movement and of your choices will be tracked and privileges ascribed accordingly. Contrary to what CNN is already putting out, Mr. Kennedy did not compare the plight of the unvaccinated to the plight of Anne Frank; rather he made the point that in a near-future totalitarian nightmare where technology is powerful enough to find you anywhere, there will be nowhere to run nor hide from the overlords. There will be no Bielski brothers. 

And then the proceedings got freaky. Brother Reza Islam came up to speak. A representative of Louis Farrakhan. I’ll admit, to say I’m not a fan of Farrakhan would be a massive understatement. He is a demagogue and a hateful one. But Brother Reza came with a message of peace and solidarity, and perhaps, change? While he could not bring himself to refer to Jews as Jews as opposed to “Members of the Jewish Community” he kept referring to a need for the end of infighting amongst the religions. Though it made my stomach turn to hear people cheering for him, much was ameliorated by the cheers for the very next speaker, Orthodox Rabbi Zev Epstein. 

Rabbi Epstein spoke of our duty to obey no mandates but those of the creator, and to obey one mandate above all, the mandate to “choose the good.” The crowd cheered equally vociferously for the Brother and the Rabbi and the Black Reverend who followed them. After a very brief calculation, I can conclude that the predominately white crowd, festooned with Christian slogans, anti-Biden flags and associated regalia, did not seem to be rabid anti-Semites, anti-Black racists, or Islamophobes. On the contrary, they seemed respectful, receptive, and grateful that these men of faith had come to state spiritual truths they’ve been hungry to hear. 

As far as I observed, there was no violence, no hate, no destruction of property, and besides a few calls to lock up Fauci and the Pharma CEO’s, no “radical” rhetoric. There was a PhD who came up late in the proceedings and pivoted to a full “anti-vax” or at least extremely “vaccine-hesitant” stance, but her information was compelling, worthy of curiosity, and she’s a PhD and we love that right?

Everyone I met there was from a Blue city in a Blue state. It would appear the so-called “anti-vaxxers” are next door. There was a Florida flag flying, but everyone I spoke with were exiles from places that no longer consider them citizens of this country with unalienable rights. 

My favorite was Marcia, from outside Philadelphia, who told me she’d marched on the Mall in 1964 against Vietnam and that she was disappointed none of her friends who’d been with her that day wanted to come to this march. She seemed genuinely confused about why that might be. And sad. Marcia says she’s a “small c-communist” and an “atheist.” Two things I am avowedly not. But we walked together, because identity is not truth, and we are both deeply interested in the latter, independent of the labels we adhere to ourselves or which others adhere to us. The pursuit of truth is supercharged by love, which supersedes identity, and it was flowing at the rally. 

During one of the speeches, I can’t remember which, we were implored to turn to a neighbor, and give them a hug. After the first, most obvious hug in such a situation, people often stop, having fulfilled their social duty. But everyone it seemed was looking for a third, and a fourth, making up perhaps, for lost time. (read more)

Did over 100,000 people older than 124 years vote in Wisconsin?

If you’ve been wondering about the extent of voter fraud in America, we may be seeing a staggering amount of either fraud or grotesque negligence in Wisconsin voter rolls. A review of the state’s voter roles showed that 569,277 voters registered on January 1, 1918. Of that number, 20% of these people, all of whom must be at least 124 years old, voted last November. Biden “won” in Wisconsin by 20,682 votes....

For regular American Thinker readers, this shouldn’t come as a surprise. Roughly two weeks ago, Jay Valentine wrote about the extent of fraud he and his team have discovered as they’ve uploaded voter rolls (which often had corrupted data that seemed deliberately intended to keep information opaque) into Valentine’s system. Once the information for any given state was loaded and sorted, it invariably revealed rather surprising information in both red and blue states. Among other things, in one red state, there were “4,300 people over 100 years old on their rolls.  Some were 121.  Those were the kids.  The really old ones were almost 2,000 years old, and there were a bunch of them – and they voted.”

(For those wondering, my understanding is that Valentine did not identify specific states because it’s important for the volunteer canvassers to have complete anonymity. Naming states could make the officials who are being exposed as corrupt or inept start looking for canvassers.)

The revelations out of Wisconsin (and I have no idea whether Jay Valentine has been part of the Wisconsin analysis) are staggering. It turns out that at least one out of every 14 voters in Wisconsin is at least 124 years old. Thus, to register in 1918, a person would have had to have been 21 or older. That means that one out of every 14 Wisconsin residents is older than 124 years. Even more amazing, 115,252 of those ancient people made the effort to vote in November. It’s certain that some of them provided the votes that gave Biden that 20,682-vote lead.

Wisconsin has tried to explain away the problem by saying that smaller precincts had technical problems when they tried to merge their data into the state’s system. The system responded to those problems by giving the people on those lists a default registration date of January 1, 1918.

In the video below, you can see an expert, Wisconsin Assembly Attorney Dean O’Donnell, an expert on the election integrity team, explaining to the Wisconsin Elections Commission how unlikely that explanation is. That one out of fourteen people had a grossly inaccurate date of registration would wreak havoc with the integrity of the voter rolls, making it highly unlikely that a Secretary of State would allow such a technical error to stand.

Official explanation for why there are 119,283 "active voters" in WI who have been registered for over 100 years "does not hold water"

569,277 voters have 1/1/1918 registration date, amounting to 1 out of every 14 voters in the system

115,252 of them voted in November 2020 pic.twitter.com/GwX037Qpxx

— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) January 20, 2022

Ultimately, there are three ways to account for the fact that 20% of people who registered to vote on January 1, 1918, showed up to vote in November 2020, none of which is good for election integrity:

1. All these registrations are fraudulent and exist for the purpose of adding votes to one candidate or another. (And yes, I’m assuming they were votes added to Biden’s column.)

2. All these registrations are computer glitches and the Secretary of State’s office is either too inept or corrupt to have corrected them. Even if they appeared accidentally on the rolls, they became the perfect vehicle for voter fraud.

3. Wisconsin is such a healthy place to live that over 500,000 residents are 124 years or older and, of that number, 20% are still so spry and engaged with the world that they filled out ballots (and, I’m sure, mostly voted for Biden).

As a point of interest, last week, Thelma Sutcliffe of Omaha, Nebraska, died. Her death was noteworthy because she was 115 ¾ years old, making her the oldest woman in America. Apparently, though, large numbers of Wisconsites have put her record to shame.

The Constitution is a legal document, for it is a contract between the federal government and the American people. In the context of a contract, if one party commits fraud, everything flowing from that fraud is reversed. Or as the law states, “fraud vitiates everything.” In this case, if fraud is proven in the key states, their certifications of the votes are undone. And if enough states had this fraud, the Senate’s certification of the Biden victory should be undone too.

This undoing won’t happen with Congress under Democrat control but there’s no reason it cannot happen if conservative voters turn out in such numbers in November 2022 and 2024 that no amount of fraud can defeat the red wave headed for Congress. (read more)

GO WOKE = GO BROKE

Biden Administration Confirms Canadian and Mexican Truck Drivers Must Show Vaccination Passport Beginning January 22nd

[...]
A perfect storm has been created by policy.

Energy policy has driven up oil, fuel, packaging and gas prices.  Transportation costs have skyrocketed. [California] Emission regulations have driven up port costs and delayed transportation fracturing the supply chain.  Vaccine mandates have hit the manufacturing and processing sectors.  Legislative policy and COVID spending have artificially inflated the economy.  Monetary policy has devalued the dollar and driven even higher inflation.

A tenuous economy cannot take these self-inflicted wounds…. and it’s about to get worse.

Into this hurricane of stagflation, the fed is going to raise interest rates.  The stock market could lose half its inflated value.  The NASDAQ is already responding to the storm clouds.  Employment is going to start getting really sketchy.  Congress will eventually announce their remedy, which will be more spending – and the dollar gets worse.

All of this was avoidable.

None of this is caused by COVID-19.

All of this is caused by Joe Biden’s economic, financial, monetary and legislative policy. (read more)

Professional Leftists Begin Trying to Retreat from the Consequences of Their COVID Nonsense

The professional political leftists are starting to rebrand themselves as having fallen victim to the “bureaucracy of COVID”, and according to those high-minded people who think very highly of themselves, we are supposed to embrace this new enlightenment from the same people who were demanding our acquiescence to their dictates.

This example of “THE AWAKENING” from an uber-progressive, Ms. Bari Weiss, on a television show, is supposed to be something I am told to appreciate.  WATCH

I/We are expected to appreciate the same people who demanded our acquiescence to every policy that was created by their ridiculous fear, simply because they now admit ‘oops, my bad‘?   Sorry, not happening.

For two years they shoved their intolerant fingers in our faces, destroyed lives and livelihoods, made ridiculous demands in order to sustain their own fear, threatened our children, destroyed the economy, used COVID as an excuse to destroy families and steal an election, attempted to force us to kneel at the altar of their mask wearing and never-ending vaccine crap… and we’re just supposed to what, forgive them?

Fat chance.  That sound you heard was millions of us locking the door, turning around to face them, and now the reckoning is about to begin.

I/We need to see these people destroyed with the heat of a thousand supernovas.

The vulgar lies and verbal filth have been extreme for two years as these ideological parasites utilized their microphones and typeset in a brutal attempt to tear down our nation.   We have all been witness.

Anyone trying to convince us this assembly of our union is not tenuous might want to revisit their proximity to reason, because they’re not just out of the city – they’re also out of the same state the ballpark is located in.

David Mamet had a famous saying, I repeat it often because it helps people break the cycle of abuse.   Essentially: …‘in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things’…

By pretending ‘not to know’, the professional left carries no guilt, no actual connection to conscience.  Denial of truth allows easier trespass, and that is exactly what Ms. Bari Weiss is attempting in that soundbite.

This hate-filled Democrat ideology relies on our willingness to reconcile their presentations and grant benefit within their seeds of doubt.

It is time for ‘cold anger‘ to turn hot.

Sorry, forgiveness is for the next generation…. 

We need to destroy those who carried out this abuse.

Our parents were forced to die alone in isolation while we were forbidden from holding their hand or being with them.  Thousands never had the opportunity to say goodbye.

We also know exactly what the covenant of marriage is all about; and it has nothing to do with being forced to stand outside hospitals, screaming in unbearable choking anguish, while our wives and husbands took their last breaths…. ALONE!

You want forgiveness for that?

F-YOU, I do not even remotely possess that capacity.

I refuse to give any “coming to the right side” credit to the vile, intolerant, hate-filled and insane leftists who demanded all the totalitarian bulls**t they now accept as futile nonsense. Weiss et al should be shunned, mocked and cast into the pit of irrelevance.

The high-minded, reach-across-the-aisle crew can continue bleating philosophically about how we must grow our ranks by accepting the newly found recalcitrance of those who have carried out this nonsense.  However, the constant granting of benefit to those who abuse us is the epitome of battered conservative syndrome.

Professional apologists for the right wing of the UniParty can keep trying to make the vulture a better sandwich in the hopes that eventually it will stop abusing us.  Meanwhile, prudent people, those slow to anger but resolute upon arrival, accept the leftists and Democrats for who they are, toxic abusers intent on destroying the liberty and freedom the aisle-reachers claim to cherish.

The professional political left would like nothing more than their victims to be comfortable forgiving them for their openly hostile attacks. Within that dynamic, the abuser is free to repeat the cycle, and make no mistake – they will repeat the cycle, eventually.

Actions have consequences.  We are not fast to the sentiment of hate; we know the damage that sensibility can create within oneself.  However, eventually, reluctantly, decisions are reached.

Those who perpetrated these two years of hell need to be held to account, and unfortunately, this type of accountability is so severe in consequence there can be no quarter provided or terms which might provide even the most remote possibility of a reoccurrence.

It is uncomfortable to accept that our response needs to be of such severity that our children will be witness to a visible anger they did not know their parents were capable of.  But witness they must if we are to ensure these vile and intolerant leftist creatures are destroyed forever.

I would rather provide the opportunity for my children to forgive me, than to see them forever living in a hopeless land of totalitarianism where freedom and liberty have been dispatched from their lives.  At least in the former their choice is possible.

The professional political left must be destroyed with extreme prejudice.

We’ve watched them ridiculing us, the riots, and the lack of support for laws, or their enforcement. We’ve been absorbing all that.

We’ve been exposed to violence upon us by both paid and volunteer operatives of a corrupt political system.  We know these things; the media trying to hide it doesn’t change our level of information.

We are not necessarily hateful.  This is a sentiment beyond hate, it is far more purposeful.

We literally watched in 2012 as the Democrat party thrice denied God during their convention.  The doors to evil enterprise opened by official party proclamation and request.  Now we are seeing the consequence.

We notice the liars, even from a great distance – seemingly invisible to the mob.  We still held open the door for the riot goer. Mannerly.

We’ve watched our borders being intentionally unsecured.  We’ve watched Islamic Terrorists slaughter Americans as our politicians proclaim their uncertainty of motive.

We know exactly who they are, and why they are doing it. We do not need to stand around discussing it.

We’re clear eyed.

You see, this sensibility does not want to exist, it is forced to exist in otherwise unwilling hosts – we also refuse to be destabilized by it.  Transgender bathrooms are more important than border security.

Illicit trade schemes, employment and the standard of living in Vietnam and Southeast Asia are more important to Wall Street and DC lobbyists, than the financial security of Youngstown Ohio.  We get it. We understand. We didn’t create that reality; we are simply responding to it.

Deliberate intent and prudence ensure we avoid failure. The course is thoughtful vigilance; it is a strategy devoid of emotion. The professional political media can call us anything they want; it really doesn’t matter…. we’re far beyond the place where labels matter.

Foolishness and betrayal of our nation have served to reveal dangers within our present condition. Misplaced corrective action, regardless of intent, is neither safe nor wise.  Trust me, the middle of America, and we are not describing a region here, is both SAFE and WISE.

When the well attired lady leaves the checkout line carrying steaks and shrimp using an EBT card, dinner options we cannot ourselves entertain, the door is still held open; yet, notations necessarily embed.  These acceptances are never erased.  We understand.

When the U.S. flag lies gleefully undefended, it is not laying unnoticed. When the stars and stripes are controversial, yet a foreign flag is honored or celebrated – they may not realize it, but we are paying attention.

When millionaire football players kneel down rather than honor our fallen soldiers and stand proud of our country, we see that.  When the FBI sends more agents to investigate a NASCAR garage door than to defend teenage girls in the act of being raped by an Olympic doctor, we are noticing.

When a school community cannot openly pray, it does not mean the prayerful were absent.  When a school board tries to silence the voice of the parents, the kitchen table conversation modifies accordingly.

When a liar and manipulator seem to win an election, the underlying irreconcilable outcomes do not pass without observation. Many Americans, far more than the minority would like to admit, know the difference between truth, lies and political agendas.

Perhaps the political left will discover that we perceive their deception the way a long-term battered spouse absorbs the blow in the hours prior to the pre-planned exit; with purpose.

A shield, or cry of micro-aggression will provide no benefit, nor quarter. Delicate sensibilities are dispatched like a feather in a hurricane.

Americans are still tolerant and patient people, the most compassionate and generous people in the history of all mankind, but we are also very purposeful.  They could have stopped with us, but they did not.  Instead, they came for our children.

You see Ms. Weiss, when pushed far enough, hard decisions are reached…

And you have pushed us much further than simply ‘far enough‘.

(read more)

Clarity of the Bigger Question, WHY This Massive Push for Vaccinations?

A guest on the Tucker Carlson show outlined the answer to this question {Direct Rumble Link} which has been stated in these pages and a multitude of conversations for well over a year.  Why has there been this massive disproportionate push for vaccination against a virus which, all things considered, is NOT that deadly?

For two years, as we have watched the various governments around the world pushing the COVID-19 vaccination, many have asked this question?  The demand and effort is wildly disproportionate to the risk. So why has this vaccination program been so severely pushed, including the mandates and requirements that everyone must follow in order to participate in society?  Why this scale of effort?

Tucker Carlson and Eva Vlaardingerbroek explained the motives and intents last night.  Yes, in essence, this is the quiet part being said out loud.

Eva Vlaardingerbroek joined Tucker Carlson to discuss the global protests against tyrannical government overreach. These mandates all stem from the goals and directives of the Great Reset movement by the World Economic Forum (a movement which the Biden Administration is a part of).

If controlling human activity is the goal, and yes, the various climate change and global planet survival frauds are at the heart of this effort, which would include the long-term goal of removing anonymous online or digital activity, then a larger reset to register all persons would require a massive global movement and need some justification.  The pandemic provides that entry point.  The COVID passport becomes the digital ID.

The virus provides the fear needed for a global vaccination program.  The mandatory vaccination program then provides the tool for registration of identity.  The registered identity then becomes the gateway for a digital identification… which, as outlined, is then used to register, monitor, track and ultimately control, a global population.

However, we enter a phase of hard-line non-compliance.  Meaning, if the worry of the virus itself begins to subside, if people start to realize the fear is disproportionate to the risk, if people start to reject the vaccination program because the never-ending contrived fear of variants lead to a never-ending booster shot program to continue the registration demand, then something else is needed in the equation to continue the registration drive.  That something else becomes the fear of another essential element for health, “food insecurity.”  That appears to be the phase we are entering.

As we previously noted, the architects of the Build Back Better society (WEF) are guiding various governments on ways to create efficient registration and compliance systems, ie. ways that permit citizens to prove their vaccinated and compliant status.  As these discussions are taking place, it is prudent to pause and think very carefully, wisely.

We all know, as we are reading this, under the guise of enhancing our safety, the U.S. Federal Government is in discussions with the medical community, multinational corporations and employers of citizens to create a more efficient process for you to register your vaccine compliance.

We know their conversation under the terminology of a COVID Passport.  The current goal is to make a system for us to show and prove our authorized work status, which, as you know, is based on your obedience to a mandated vaccine.

Beta tests are being conducted in various nations, each with different perspectives and constitutional limitations, based on pesky archaic rules and laws that govern freedom.

For the western, or for lack of a better word ‘democratic‘ outlook, Australia, New Zealand and Europe are leading the way with their technological system of vaccination check points and registered state/national vaccination status tied to your registration identification.

New York City has recently joined the vaccine checkpoint process, as their city requires the vaccine to enter all private businesses.

The Australian electronic checkpoints are essentially gateways where QR codes are being scanned from the cell phones of the compliant vaccinated citizen. Yes comrades, there’s an app for that.

Currently, the vaccine status scans are registered by happy compliance workers, greeters at the entry to the business or venue. Indeed, the Walmart greeter has a new gadget to scan your phone prior to allowing you custody of a shopping cart.

In restaurants, the host or hostess has a similar compliance scanner to check you in prior to seating or a reservation confirmation.

It’s simple and fun. You pull up your QR code on your cell phone (aka portable transponder and registration device), using the registration app, and your phone is scanned delivering a green check response to confirm your correct vaccination status and authorized entry.

The Australian government, at both a federal and state level, is working closely with Big Tech companies (thirsting for the national contract) to evaluate the best universal process that can be deployed nationwide.

As noted by all six Premiers in the states down under, hardware (scanners) and software (registration) systems are all being tested to find the most comprehensive/convenient portable units to settle upon. Meanwhile in the U.S., cities like Los Angeles and New York await the beta test conclusion before deploying their own version of the same process.

In Europe, they are also testing their vaccine checkpoint and registration processes known as the EU “Green Pass.”

The “Green Pass” is a similar technological system that gives a vaccinated and registered citizen access to all the venues and locations previously locked down while the COVID-19 virus was being mitigated. What would have been called a “vast right-wing conspiracy theory” 24 months ago, is now a COVID passport process well underway.

As with all things in our rapid technological era, you do not have to squint to see the horizon and accept that eventually this process will automate, and there will be a gadget or scanning gateway automatically granting you access without a person needing to stand there and scan each cell phone QR code individually.

The automated process just makes sense. You are well aware your cell phone already transmits an electronic beacon enabling your Uber or Lyft driver access to your location at the push of a touchscreen button, another convenient app on your phone. So, why wouldn’t the gateways just accept this same recognizable transmission as registration of your vaccine compliant arrival at the coffee shop?

The automated version is far easier and way cooler than having to reach into your pocket or purse and pulling up that pesky QR code on the screen. Smiles everyone, the partnership between Big Tech and Big Government is always there to make your transit more streamline and seamless. Heck, you won’t even notice the electronic receiver mounted at the entry. Give it a few weeks and you won’t remember the reason you were laughing at Alex Jones any more than you remember why you are taking off your shoes at the airport.

However, as this process is created, it is worth considering that you are being quietly changed from an individual person to a product. Some are starting to worry in the beta test:

[…] “you must become an object with attributes sitting in a database. Instead of roaming around anonymously making all sorts of transactions without the government’s knowledge, Australians find themselves passing through ‘gates’. …

All product-based systems have these gates to control the flow of stock and weed out errors. It is how computers see things. The more gates, the more clarity.

You are updating the government like a parcel pings Australia Post on its way to a customer. If a fault is found, automatic alerts are issued, and you are stopped from proceeding. In New South Wales, this comes in the form of a big red ‘X’ on the myGov vaccine passport app (if you managed to link your Medicare account without smashing the phone to bits).

Gate-keeping systems have been adapted from retail and transformed into human-based crowd solutions to micromanage millions of lives with the same ruthless efficiency as barcodes tracking stock. There is no nuance or humanity in this soulless digital age. Barcodes are binary. Good – bad. Citizen or dissident.

Even if you have all the required government attributes to pass through the gates – two vaccines, six boosters, and a lifelong subscription to Microsoft – something could go wrong. If your data fails the scan, you’ll slip into digital purgatory and become an error message. (read more)

It could be problematic if your status fails to register correctly, or if the system identifies some form of alternate lifestyle non-compliance that will block you from entry. Then again, that’s what beta tests are for, working out all these techno bugs and stuff. Not to worry…. move along….

Then again… “For those in the privileged class allowed to shop, take note of Covid signs which encourage cashless transactions under the guise of ‘health’. Messaging around cards being ‘safer’ will increase until the Treasury tries to remove cash entirely, almost certainly with public approval.”

Wait, now we are squinting at that familiar image on the horizon because we know those who control things have been talking about a cashless society for quite a while.

We also know that data is considered a major commodity all by itself. Why do you think every system you encounter in the modern era requires your phone number even when you are not registering for anything. It, meaning you, us, are all getting linked into this modern registration system that is defining our status. We also know that system operators buy and sell our registered status amid various retail and technology systems.

Yeah, that opaque shadow is getting a little clearer now.

Perhaps you attempt to purchase dog food and get denied entry into Pet Smart because you didn’t renew the car registration.  Or perhaps you are blocked from entry because you forgot to change the oil on the leased vehicle you drive, and Toyota has this weird agreement with some retail consortium.   You head to the oil change place that conveniently pops up in the citizen compliance App –it’s only two blocks away– they clear the alert after they do the oil change, and you are gateway compliant again.

Missed your booster shot? We’re sorry citizen, your bank account is frozen until your compliance is restored… please proceed to the nearest vaccination office as displayed conveniently on your cell phone screen to open access to all further gates (checkpoints)…. tap to continue!

It seems transparently obvious where this is heading:

A series of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) filings into the Dutch government has resulted in rather revealing letters showing the motive of the World Economic Forum, an assembly of multinational banks and corporations, summoning government leaders.

Notice how they are using the words “shaping policies for the post-COVID-19 era“?

The World Economic Forum, a collection of corporations, “shaping” government “policies.”

Why does this matter?  Well, fascism was traditionally defined as an authoritarian government working hand-in-glove with corporations to achieve objectives. A centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, using severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.

That system of government didn’t work in the long-term, because the underlying principles of free people reject government authoritarianism.  Fascist governments collapsed, and the corporate beneficiaries were nulled and scorned for participating.  Then, along came a new approach to achieve the same objective.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) was created to use the same fundamental associations of government and corporations.  Only this time, it was the multinational corporations who organized to tell the government(s) what to do.  The WEF was organized for multinational corporations to assemble and tell the various governments how to cooperate with them, in order to be rewarded by them.   Corporatism was/is the outcome.  The government is now doing what the multinationals tell them to do, and in return the multinationals install the compliant politicians.

Fascism, the cooperation between government and corporations, is still the underlying premise; the World Economic Forum simply flipped the internal dynamic putting the corporations in charge of handing out the instructions.

What results is a slightly modified definition of fascism:

…A massive multinational corporate conglomerate; telling a centralized autocratic government leader what to do; and using severe economic and social regimentation as a control mechanism; combined with forcible suppression of opposition by both the corporations and government.

Doesn’t that define our current reality, especially in the era of COVID?

The instructions from the multinational corporations to government would be called the “Great Reset“, or as commonly transposed by the government officials receiving the instructions, “Build Back Better”.

(read more)

A Very Polite Insult

On the state of the unvaccinated vaccinated mind.

The UVs
Despite the proclamations of the experts masquerading as scientists who do not follow science but rather money, there is no such thing as a vaccinated individual against SARS-COV-2. They intentionally altered the definition of ‘vaccines’¹ to psychologically engineer the social divisions we are now suffering by implying that a temporary experimental therapeutic injection of dubious origin for dubious purposes for scandalous profit is a ‘vaccine’ that will inoculate against the very bioweapon unleashed to justify the mass distribution of these ‘vaccines’ around the word. Those who have received one injection or five are all of the same uninoculated status and with the emergence of the sniffles and headache variant, this has never been more true.

The very act of accepting an injection, and the egos that promulgate the belief that in doing so their virtuous act of noble sacrifice was for the betterment of humanity will need the clarity that comes with time and honest self reflection to realize they have always simply been the unvaccinated vaccinated whose blind trust and ignorance are to blame for their arrogance and delusions. At present these arrogant delusions have all institutions of power at their back and are sailing them comfortably toward an abyss from which their destiny is one of shame, guilt or a public dragging and head shaving as willing colluders of mass criminals. War is war, whether there’s shelling of projectiles or injecting of bioweapons, and in all wars there are victors who determine the fate of colluders and terms of their comeuppance.

Until their proud delusions and egos, enhanced by a misguided certainty, are modulated toward self reflection and objective honesty (their only propellants toward truth and reality) we are headed down a very dangerous path. If we do not orient ourselves to the arrogant and delusional mind of the unvaccinated vaccinated they will be further weaponized by those forces who have taken it upon themselves to terrorize the world with an engineered plague, and its precursor the engineered cure. Both manifestations of engineering are well coordinated and organized crimes against humanity. To deny this reality two years into the ongoing cover up and gaslighting of these crimes is to side directly or indirectly with the criminals. The genius of the criminals is they have now weaponized the shame, embarrassment and victimhood of those who could not foresee their motivations in advance, or who still refuse to recognize themselves on the wrong end of a grand con, and are misdirecting their animosity, ire and cruelty toward those that did.

We have called them useful dupes, useful idiots, mindless sheep, braindead morons, neurotic ninnies, I could spend the remainder of this polite insult listing the names we “anti-vaxxers” have slung in the direction of the unvaccinated vaccinated and they would all be true, and as you’ll come to see mostly polite but then it would not be a very polite but rather a very long insult. What we have avoided for too long in signaling to the comfort of our own tribe the insults that unite us, is admitting that first and foremost the UVs, like all of us, are victims of a global conspiracy involving several levels of institutional power both public and private to concoct a grand fraud through intentional deceit and behavioral coercion engineered through endless grotesque lies and propaganda. This is what unites us, this is where we must reunite our energies, wrath, vitriol and vengeance if we are to ever have any hope of ending the grand fraud before a greater darkness descends on humanity, one which may already be underway.

UV Motivations
Incapable of detecting the fraud or being skeptical of what was happening on a global scale they undertook the singular and exceptional action set before them by the conspirators, their government and ‘health expert’ accomplices, believing their words that they must “do their part” for “the common good”. Unable to conduct rudimentary research outside the prescribed confines of fabulist google results or legacy media propaganda, they believed effective vaccines for a coronavirus could be created using experimental gene technology, skipping animal trials, short cutting human trials with rigged data while magically showing 90% efficacy against the already mutating virus with a 98% survivability across all age groups, and all of it in a world record shattering nine months. The words dupe and idiot are very, very polite.

Wanting desperately to consider themselves unselfish and virtuous they went to the place of “vaccination” to undergo the procedure they were told would be responsible for protecting others, a procedure that involved the injection of experimental substances into their physical body, an act that takes a tremendous amount of trust in private corporations with a long history of defrauding and killing subjects for profit. The stated primary motivation of protecting others was mostly virtuous cover for believing if they “did their part” that the liberties they once enjoyed, which the conspirators had no right to ever withhold, would magically return. No power in history has ever relinquished liberties after convincing their subjects to voluntarily surrender them for their own benefit. The words moron and sheep are very, very polite.

Imagine making this ultimate sacrifice of one’s body to the “common good” and being told by your loveable and trusted captors after they lied to you incessantly that your noble sacrifice was not just for nothing, it was a total failure and it was entirely the fault of those who refused to make that same sacrifice. Never in the history of medicine was the outcome of a treatment’s fate determined by those who did not take it, and yet here are with the sniffles variant exposing fraud after fraud and still being told that a fourth and fifth booster will do the trick, until six months from now when the sixth will be required and then as if by magic the final conspiracy theories will whither with innate immune systems and all of what remains of enslaved society will be dependent on them for their short, miserable, subservient lives. 

Stockholm syndrome victims seek comfort in the confidence of their tormentors. Having psychologically bonded with those who stole their rights, imprisoned them in their homes, and scared them helpless for months on end utilizing their dedicated global media lackeys to turn up the fear thermometer on command, the UV victims bought every story they were sold in a long line of deceptively concocted fables and fantasies. Their tormentors intentionally manipulated tests and data, withheld meaningful cures and implemented deadly treatments like Remdesivir (run death is near) and ventilators while blaming as many deaths on the weapon they intentionally unleashed through government financial incentives, like $100,000 hospital bonuses for every death classified as “Covid”.² All this intentionally engineered fear and death drove the UV into the arms of their tormentors for the promised cure.

Shame, Humiliation, Vengeance (1919-1933 Germany) ^{3 4 5}
The term du jour of the disobedient and non submissive resistance is ‘mass formation’ and frequent connections are made to Germany “going bonkers” prior to world war two. The similarities between then and now are significantly underwhelming. The unification for their ‘psychosis’ was national and ethnic in foundation and economic, geopolitical and psychological in origin.

Germany as a nation was thoroughly put through the ringer in the aftermath of World War One. The obvious historical example being the putative measures imposed in the Treaty of Versailles, which was forced through with a humanitarian crises for coercion and whose terms were fundamentally unfair and intentionally impossible to realize. German obligations for reparations amounted to 134 billion gold Reichsmarks, after having already printed their way into effective bankruptcy to maintain the war. The hyperinflation that followed in the early 1920s rendered the currency useless. The stock market speculation and crash, subsequent recession and high unemployment added more insult to injury by the end of the decade creating more social strife and poverty.

The British naval blockade of 1919 effectively led to mass starvation, including the deaths of children from malnourishment in Germany and Austria. Fishing boats and merchant ships were regulated or seized and Germany’s request for 2.5 million tones of food was denied by the Allies. Facing death by starvation Germany reluctantly signed the putative Treaty. The demilitarization, forfeiting land, colonies, industrial zones including the Saarland, and limitations on trade and imports made life miserable and any hope of recovery all but impossible.

This compounded a collective shame on top of the humiliating surrender. The feelings of unresolved or unacknowledged shame in individuals leads to aggression and rage. Nationally these are the perfect conditions for the rise of demagogues and tyrants. The propaganda and psychological manipulation that put the finishing touches on a failed Austrian painter’s capture of the enraptured masses was by then a fait accompli. Engineering conditions for confrontation as a means of deflecting threats to their identity was easy justification to reclaiming moral worth. In such circumstances, individuals will feel justified in hurting others in order to regain a sense of dignity and control over their identity. Vengeance against transgressors by this stage is all but inevitable, with the dehumanization of any group of people deemed to be the source of transgressions easily concocted through psychological manipulation, most often rooted in narrative propaganda. The final call to action for retribution simply needs a directed source of output for its energies, real or fabricated, and in the case of a bonkers Germany it was both.

Shame, Humiliation, Vengeance (2020-2022 Globally) ^{6 7 8}
If we examine the past two years under the same terms - war, armistice, terms of surrender and demoralizing submission we see a lot of the same elements. After dictating the one-sided declaration of war on their citizenry, governments could hide behind a plausible deniability that they were not privy to the release of the bioweapon, the source of the virus. Their utter lack of curiosity in settling this dispute the past two years should be confirmation enough of the opposite. The evidence is still overwhelming, including Trump’s executive order of September 2019 mobilizing emergency vaccine powers to federal agencies to set the stage for ‘operation warp speed’9, the simulation of pandemic responses (Event 201) and the origins of the virus in western state-oligarch lab research and funding. They could then assume the role as caretaker and protector of those they declared war on, insisting their measures were effective and necessary for ‘heath and safety’. Through psychological warfare to keep the populace subdued, fearful and obedient they bought time to prepare and release the second act of war in the form of the only possible cure - the “vaccines”.

This total war on free people’s requires above all else surrender, submission, obedience to authority. Those who have declared war, dictated the terms of every insane yet carefully coordinated battle, from social isolation of healthy people to destroyed childhoods, to inhumane methods of coercion to accept the one and only avenue toward armistice. Those who refuse are separated from society for ostracization, dehumanization and further social isolation until they finally surrender. The most powerful weapons in this psychological war are those who did submit and obey, now having an inextricable bond with their conquerors. These are the Vichy henchmen of Nazi occupied France but on a global scale. They’ll accept the terms of their contingent liberty as torturers and enforcers against those with the courage to fight and resist and never surrender.

We can easily call this weaponization of the unvaccinated vaccinated a ‘mass psychosis’ event and all the elements familiar are there to help us make sense of their misguided cruelty. The free floating anxiety and social isolation were the seeds of their demise but not the conditions of their total surrender to experimental eugenics, which must factor in their psychological state, one of fear and insecurity. Those who are fearful and insecure are more likely to extract worth from the bonding of a group or tribe, and if they experience shame and humiliation that comes with surrender and submission, even subconsciously and retroactively they are predisposed to act aggressively and confrontationally as a means of ego defense. Insecure individuals tend to hold less positive views about themselves and seek external validation of their self-worth from others. If those ‘others’ are the tribe of obedient submissive UVs then their devotion to lies that bond them can be a collective source of identity and self worth. If repeated often enough and reiterated by their captors the lies that form bonds are of ‘virtue’ and ‘unselfish sacrifice’ for ‘health and protection’ and all for ‘the common good.’ Weaponizing these UVs to act aggressively and confrontationally toward the “anti-vaxxers” becomes almost too easy. They are justified in their perceived righteousness. In the absence of critical thought or reflection of the past two years, these UVs still embrace their chains, find comfort with their tribe and turn to their tormentors for guidance and direction. Their total capitulation means they can now be activated as enforcers against the final pockets of resistance.

Ire Misdirection
The diabolical genius of our tormentors is their ability to maintain the big lies in the face of crumbling evidence. Seeing the foundations collapse with the emergence of the sniffles and headache variant they have in lock-step turned their outrage performances toward the unvaccinated, and recently did so in peculiar unison as if directed by a symphony conductor, a bald bond-like antagonist Germanic tyranny-symphony conductor who resides in Geneva and only needs a wheelchair and white cat in his lap to comically fulfill his role as global villain.

Their UV captives will witness the unfounded demagoguery of WEF primed weaklings Trudeau and Macron, slavish buffoons Scott Morrison and Boris Johnson, and half demented mumbling corpses like Joe Brandon direct their rage and blame toward those who sniffed out their scam long ago and refused to obey. Tyrants, particularly weak in nature and stature, are always the most dangerous for they will frame the dissidents and outcasts as contemptible threats and turn the wrath and vengeance of their splendid dupes in service to their evil against them.

Those who continue to serve the conspirators of these crimes against humanity are now collaborators, responsible for the maiming of children, the slaughter of the weak, frail, poor and elderly who do not know any better and still trust that the events of the past two years happened as their caretakers in these globally interconnected corporate-states have fabricated. And so we find ourselves hurtling quickly toward the seemingly unfathomable as we cross the checkered flags of discrimination, dehumanization, organization and polarization, more than halfway toward a twenty-first century global genocide of the brightest, strongest and most courageous, the last bulwarks to build back better post-humanist fascism.

[...]

Build Back Better Armistice
If you’ve seen it all from the mountain tops near and far for the past two years, or are just now seeing it then you know the skeptics and dissidents are already being criminalized. They now carry the label of ‘non citizens’ in France according to their Rothschild President, domestic prisoners in Germany and Austria under house arrest, banished from work life in Italy and Australia, “racist, misogynist, intolerable” in the words of the recently re-elected gormless sauna boy of Klaus Schwab in Canada, just another of the globally interconnected cowardly traitors, all graduates of the school of future gormless Klaus Schwab servants.

The only plagues we are living are dehumanization and division and a massive courage deficit in positions of power. As dehumanization spreads, the acceptance with which it is permitted to spread will be shocking for the year 2022 after three generations of historians and leaders said “never again”. They have a plan to build back better, and free critical thinkers who refuse to submit are not in their blueprints. If they’ve engineered the past two years of torment and misery through planned democide it’s clear they won’t stop for failed “vaccines”, the sniffles or dissidents alike. Build back better is nothing more than terms of their own armistice for a war whose victims had no idea they were ever at war and whose prisoners of war are being mobilized in their final push for total tyranny. This is a silent war, and it will not end because a virus is weakened, or vaccines are useless, or any amount of people recognize the past two years for the blatant crimes against humanity that they were. This goes for all the UVs out there.

If you pride yourself in thinking you are double vaccinated or triple and are happy to go along with four, five, and six toxic jabs through next year to protect against those sniffles, and do whatever your masters demand of you then mindless fucking sheep is indeed a very, very polite insult. Having chosen to surrender to tyranny, your liberty will be an illusion and the remainder of your life nasty, brutish and short, dying suddenly from weakness and submission, labeled ‘natural causes’ from ‘post-pandemic stress disorder’ of course, unless a government bonus is offered to the hospital that claims your corpse, then you’ll be a ‘covid death’, and how poetic that would be after submitting to all those jabs. (read more)

My speech at "Defeat the Mandates" march today

Here is the text of the speech I'll deliver on Jan 23 at our rally in DC

Intro: Steve Kirsch is a former high tech executive from Silicon Valley who left his job in order to devote full time to fighting the mandates. 

Hi. I’m Steve.

I am not a doctor. I’m worse. I’m an engineer with two degrees from MIT.

I look at data. I make decisions based on what the data says, not on what people tell me to think.

After 3 relatives of a friend of mine died right after being vaccinated, I started looking at the data from the clinical trials, from studies, from the government, and from doctors.

What the data said was troubling. Very troubling.

First of all, this entire pandemic was completely avoidable. 

We had an early treatment protocol in March of 2020 developed by George Fareed and Brian Tyson. Nobody dies on their protocol if they get treated early. Zero. And only a few people got hospitalized. Yet today, the NIH is saying nothing about this protocol.

That is ridiculous. If they are going to mandate anything, they should mandate you get this protocol if you get COVID. But they don’t. Instead, doctors can have their licenses revoked if they prescribe early treatment drugs like ivermectin and Fluvoxamine.

We don’t need masks, we don’t need vaccines, we don’t need mandates, and we don’t need lockdowns. We never did.

What we need to do is to start listening to the doctors who have treated thousands of COVID cases with no deaths. Is that too much to ask?

But the NIH refused to listen to these doctors.  And instead, they focused on the creation of a vaccine which the evidence shows is making things worse. Much worse. COVID cases are at an all time high.

We are being mandated to take a vaccine for a societal benefit without ever being shown the risk-benefit analysis.

There is a reason for that. The benefit is negative. According to over 12 studies, the vaccines are killing at least 15 people for every life that the vaccines were projected to save. And we are permanently disabling even more. For kids, I’ve seen a risk benefit analysis showing we kill over 100 kids to save 1 kid from COVID. 

NOBODY has the right to MANDATE that I must risk my life to save other people I don’t know. That’s unethical and immoral. I would not voluntarily choose to deprive my kids of their father. 

NOBODY has the right to mandate that I take a vaccine which is likely to double my chances of being infected. The data now coming out of the UK and Scotland clearly shows this. In Study after study, the more you vaccinate, the more likely you are to be infected. Precisely the opposite of what we were told.

This is why Boris Johnson in UK recently dropped all COVID restrictions. “We will trust the judgment of the English people.” he said. Finally. 

Why can’t we do that here?

People look to their doctors for advice on whether to take the vaccine. But doctors cannot speak  the truth. If they do, they will have their licenses revoked for spreading misinformation. So they remain silent. This isn’t about what is best for patients. This is about silencing trusted professionals through intimidation tactics. That’s wrong.

The other thing that I found particularly troubling was the lack of transparency and accountability.

Nobody at the CDC, FDA, or NIH wanted to answer any of  my questions on camera.

My member of Congress is Anna Eshoo. She refuses to meet with me or answer any of my questions. Not a single person in Congress who I have supported over the years will answer a single question I have.

So I offered $1M to the members of the outside committees  of the FDA and CDC if they would meet with me just so I could ask a few questions on camera. They all refused. 

I’ve published my questions on my substack: stevekirsch.substack.com. I hope that you will go there and read the list. Ask your school boards, your member of congress, and your state legislators. Demand answers.

I’d like to share just a few of my questions with you today. If you like these questions, you’ll like the list of questions on my substack even more.

1. There are over 9 studies that show the vaccines make it MORE likely (not less likely) you’ll be infected from COVID. Did they make a mistake in all 9 studies?

2. My neurologist has 20,000 patients and 2,000 vaccine injured. She’s been in practice for 11 years w/o a vaccine injury. This vaccine is over 20,000X worse than other vaccines. If the vaccine is so safe, how do you explain a 10% injury rate?

3. There are now over 1M adverse events reported in the VAERS system. Using CDC’s methodology, we know VAERS is ~40x underreported. That’s 40M adverse events and > 5,000 conditions that are significantly elevated. How can the CDC not spot a single safety signal (other than myocarditis)?

4. Maddie de Garay was injured in the Pfizer phase 3 trial. She’s paralyzed. why didn’t the FDA investigate? That’s clinical trial fraud. Why aren’t we telling people that based on the clinical trial, there is a 1 chance in 1,000 your child could be paralyzed too?

5. If the vaccines are safe and effective, then why do the manufacturers need liability protection?

6. If the vaccines are so safe, Why aren’t any of the organizations that mandate vaccines accepting liability? 

Nobody wants to answer any of these questions. I have over 100 on my substack just like those.

In closing, I’m here to save my kids.

I’m a Dad to three kids. Two of them are in school. They are being forced by their schools to take the booster. That booster is more likely to increase the chance they will die or be infected.  It’s wrong. Their schools will not answer any of my questions. Why not? Why are they so afraid to be held accountable? Why do they refuse to accept liability for their mandates?

While I have not been successful in having a single one of my questions answered, maybe you will have better luck than I have. 

Until they answer these questions to your satisfaction, you should not comply with their mandates.

Thank you for being here today.

(read more)

The narrative is falling apart, piece by piece

The momentum feels to me like it is accelerating... Here are five important new developments you should be aware of.

Here are some narrative pieces that have been falling apart that were recently brought to my attention.

Here are the five new truths:

1. EEU Regulators, WHO Call for End to COVID Boosters, Citing Evidence Strategy Is Failing: Experts admit that frequent booster shots are not sustainable.

2. The vaccines make you more likely to get COVID: It was supposed to make things better, but we’re basically mandating you get a shot that makes you more likely to get infected. That is totally insane, but that’s what we are doing. Check out the graphs here. No age confounding this time: UK Government Data proves the Covid-19 Vaccines DOUBLE your chances of catching Covid-19.

3. The vaccines aren’t safe: I’m now hearing a lot from prominent formerly pro-vax docs that they are turning on the vaccine. This is great news. Nobody is going public yet, but they are all pissed and realize they have been misled. It will not be pretty. This is of course great news.

4. Cloth masks don’t work: The CDC finally admits that cloth masks that they said worked before and that everyone wore (including Rochelle Walensky) don’t actually work. The other mask types don’t work either, but it will take them longer to figure out the obvious. P100 respirators do work but only a small percentage of people know that. I can’t wait to see Rochelle Walensky wear a P100 respirator; after all, she should be modelling best practices.

5. Kids shouldn’t have boosters shots: Top WHO scientist finally admits that kids shouldn’t get boosted!!!! Yet the US colleges and universities aren’t going to back off. Someone is very wrong here and for once it isn’t the WHO.

Here are some older truths that should have been realized by now, but are still going on:

1. Remdesivir is killing patients, not saving them: RDV is standard operating procedure in the US, but everyone I talk to says it doesn’t work and is much more likely to kill patients than save them. Doctors are forced to give it by hospital policy.

2. Social distancing doesn’t work: The MIT study came out in April, 2021 that showed social distancing makes no difference. 6 feet or 60 feet made no difference. People still haven’t figured this out.

(read more)