content for usaapay.com courtesy of thenotimes.com
WELCOME

spread the word
.


The No Times
comments, ephemera, speculation, etc.
(protected political speech and personal opinion)

- If this is your 1st visit to this page, please start at the bottom -


2023-


2023-11-25 g
KILLING COLLEGE STUDENTS?

EDITOR'S NOTE:
I am less safe. My immediate and extended family is less safe.
All Jews in America are less safe because Mohammedans have been brought
here from West and Central Asia as well as North Africa.

DAMN ALL OF YOU WHO DELIBERATELY
BROUGHT THIS PLAGUE TO THE NEW WORLD.



Hi @Cornell
This is from Cornell discussion forum. Are you OK with your students calling for killing all Jewish students on campus? pic.twitter.com/kaMcFD3944

— Dr. Eli David (@DrEliDavid) October 30, 2023

*

The sudden surge in anti-Israel sentiment among America’s youth is a phenomenon primarily made possible by large-scale immigration. A quarter of American children live in immigrant households. And most foreign countries have radically different attitudes toward the Jewish state.
https://t.co/7k6ebZyZYR


— Stephen Miller (@StephenM) October 20, 2023


2023-11-25 f
KILLING BROWN PEOPLE

That’s not a breech, it’s an inside job.
If not, it means the IDF is the most incompetent
military that ever walked the face of the earth.”



Obama Inc is Running Out of Brown People to Kill

This is Israel's American-planned-and-financed Color Revolution

I’ve kept my mouth shut on Israel’s October 7th tragedy, trying to angle out of arguments, until I realized that while inflicted primarily upon Israel, it was also designed to traumatize the whole world via the initial massacre, then inevitably the raining of hell on Israel and Gaza, making us in the rest of the world fight each other, miring us in emotion. Make us feel powerless, frustrated, angry, fearful. Make us hand over agency.

That made it my business. And yours.

I was raised with a deep respect, almost a reverence for Jewish people because my father had been put in charge of a concentration camp – “a work camp, not a death camp”, he would say – after the war. When I say ‘raised’, I mean I felt his feelings, his despair, his trauma. Once in a very long while, he’d say, “I saw things….” and then stop. I suspect this below is what he saw and it turned him into something other. Separate, alone with horror. His grief, his rage over what happened turned me, a kid, into someone aligned with the Jewish people, determined to defend them. I suspect a lot of us felt that passion growing up, that justice must be done, that this must not happen again.

Another experience I have that is relevant to this matter, is that my mother was one of the first experimental subjects of MKUltra at the Allan Memorial, under Allen Dulles’s pet, psychiatrist Ewan Cameron. MKUltra’s subproject 68 designed and tested the elements of mind control. They chose to experiment (without consent) on the wrong mother suffering post-partum, and earned in me, an implacable enemy.

The first principle of mind control is trauma programming; repeated horrifying shock turns people passive. That’s what they did to the first subjects. They ramped up the ECT, called Page-Russells but used more intensively. They reduced patients to a pre-verbal state, entirely dependent and pliable. Ready for programming.

Psychological warfare was launched on innocent citizens, designed for mass mind control, reducing us all to childlike dependence on a malignant government.

The past decades have seen one collective trauma after another, beginning with the JFK assassination. Repeated assassinations, wars, endless threats, one hideous recession after another, periodic political earthquakes, all used as psychological warfare, launched on innocent citizens, meant to reduce us to dependence on a malignant government. October 8th’s beheaded babies, old lady hostages, videotaped rapes, children in cages were meant for every single one of us. And while we’re at it, in the same time period, the Lewiston, Maine shooter? He had started hearing voices in his head according to his family. They can do that now, training and seducing in chat rooms, manipulating the weak and crazy. They have the technology. I have no doubt, zero, that most mass shooters are MKUltra. They are mind controlled. They are trauma programming meant to terrify. The specific purpose is to disarm us.

What is the endgame?  Docile slaves handing over more and more money with every paycheck. Never able to get out of debt. Scared about the future. Biddable. Fight this, they order. And we do. We need money to fight. Give it over. And we do. Sacrifice the future for safety. And we do.

October 7th was designed, gamed, and triggered. It was meant to hide their disastrous government. The neo-liberals in DC have lost the Ukraine war, eviscerated the army’s supplies, run up the debt another nine trillion. More of the Bidens’ criminal activities are revealed every day. There is a new sheriff in Congress, and he looks very much like the Conservative candidate for Prime Minister in Canada, calm, measured, fully informed and loaded for bear. This is the face of the new populism, considered, determined, smarter than John Podesta, incorruptible. And young enough to be around for twenty years.

Across the country, election integrity people are winning, and if defeated in court, they don’t give up. Each of them risks jail from the corrupt Justice Department every day. I’m not saying the Democrats won’t cheat, but every ballot box will have a sentinel and a lawyer. Mark Elias is going to be exhausted by the end of it, stir-fried, ready for retirement.

The dam is breaking over vaccine damage, and there are now hundreds of lawyers taking clients in the U.S.. Canada admitted this week that the shots were contaminated with DNA. New Zealand’s government announced this week that Jacinda Ardern’s government knew the shots were dangerous and forced them anyway.  Trump rises in the polls with every regime attack. Parents have never been more activated.

This is Obama’s game. His people did it. This is how arrogant he is. He needs war to win the next election. He needs war to escape the devastation of his reputation, to save his “legacy”.  And he hates Israel. So he’s launched a color revolution to take down Bibi, and break Israel’s legerdemain in science, business and near everything else. Swamp the country with guilt and brutalize its people. Neo-liberals like Obama have effectively destroyed Europe’s culture, flooding it with desperate murderous barbarians with zero education. This is what these people do, they destroy everything good, feed on the fear, and loot everything not nailed down. Obama is a criminal. Biden is a criminal. The Bushes made their money on Jewish slaves at Auschwitz and financing the Nazis.Once you have done that, there is no goodness in you. It’s all lies and corruption and you can’t even see the good. You serve Lucifer.

Obama is the Manchurian Candidate, the most successful of many confected creations designed to seduce the left or right by the people with all the money. He bombed more brown people that the Bush regime – which was a lot -  and he gave a trillion dollars to Wall Street, while bankrupting Main Street and making homelessness universal in every town and city. He isn’t a leftist hero, he is a thief of peace and prosperity.

Do you remember Richard Perle? He was the Iraq warmonger who was part of the neo-con contingent in the late 90’s. These jokers believed that only war would focus American’s attention, bring out manly virtues, pull people away from pleasure, turn them to “God” and back to an authoritarian church. There were books written about this stupid idea. The left grabbed this notion, convinced they could seduce and weaken the right with endless war.

When David Brooks was still thinking clearly twenty years ago, he pointed out that the only way to make money as a political writer in DC was to cozy up to war profiteers. Today, eighty-five percent of DC think tanks are funded by weapons manufacturers.

I am going to walk you through this theory, courtesy of Coffee and Covid on Substack, Patrick Byrne on X. Caroline Glick, who is the only writer I trust on Israel and the Financial Times confirm their analysis. All the links below.

Coffee and Covid: “Following the summer battle over Israel’s leftist Supreme Court, Biden (i.e. Obama), U.S. intelligence agencies, and Israeli intelligence agencies undermined Israel — to get rid of Benjamin Netanyahu.”

Caroline Glick continues the story  “In other words, the riots, protests, acts of political violence and intimidation that have swamped Israel since January were not spontaneous responses to the government’s legal reform proposals.”

They were the beginnings of a color revolution, paid for by Americans.

Coffee and Covid:  “The gist of Patrick’s theory is that former Obama officials Dan Shapiro (Obama’s ambassador to Israel), Avril Haines (Obama deputy assistant), Anthony Blinken (Obama deputy assistant), and Michele Flournoy (Obama undersecretary of defense) began representing an Israeli cyber-security software developer called Paragon. Paragon develops top-secret security tools for Israeli’s defense industry.

“After the former Obama officials got involved with Paragon, and continuing through the Biden regime, the U.S. has systematically targeted all of Paragon’s competitors using a variety of federal procurement tools and sanctions, forcing them either to close or sell off their assets to Paragon or the U.S. One software provider is deeply connected to Barack Obama and Joe Biden.  Paragon is also linked to former Israeli Prime Minister and sworn Netanyahu enemy Ehud Barak, who visited Epstein Island “on business” over 30 times, which means that he is almost certainly a blackmail pawn of the U.S. and Israeli deep state’s intelligence agencies.

“At this point, Israel depends on one single security software provider, Paragon, a fact that the country’s intelligence agencies have warned is a critical security risk…. “

Caroline Glick:

“Channel 13’s military correspondent Alon Ben David reported that the Biden administration and the U.S. intelligence agencies had decided to destroy Israel’s cybersecurity industry and force Israel’s cybersecurity firms to transfer their ownership, operations—and allegiance—to the United States.

“Rather than defend Israel’s industry, according to Ben David, the government was ‘deliberately destroying’ the industry to placate Washington. “The Defense Ministry has already frozen most of the export licenses and the Americans have simply decided to shut down our offensive cyber industry and transfer it to them,” Ben David explained.

“They (the protests) were planned and financed weeks before Justice Minister Yariv Levin was appointed to his position and well before the government took any position on anything.”

Just waiting for an opening to take down Israel.

The Day Itself

A former IDF soldier who served on the Gaza border describes what happened on the day. He can be watched here on X.

“On September 1, the government confiscated the weapons of the security teams in Gaza built communities, against their will. On September 10, the (de facto) municipalities received reports of increased tensions on the border during the holidays. Those same heads asked the army if they should cancel the festivities. The army said, “No, don’t cancel anything, we are heading for calm.”

“Israel is the most advanced surveillance state in the world, and the border is the most heavily surveilled in the world. During Covid, they could track one person from the airport to a bathroom in a soccer stadium.

“Command center operators reported on the breach in fifteen locations. This is documented. Once the thousands invaded, they had seven hours to kill everyone in their path, destroy and take hostages back to Gaza unscathed and unopposed.

“An attack helicopter takes five minutes to activate. I served on Gaza border. It started at 7:01 on October 8. It should have taken five minutes before the whole thing was upended. Instead they had eight hours to kill thousands and bring back hostages alive. That’s not a breech, it’s an inside job. If not, it means the IDF is the most incompetent military that ever walked the face of the earth.”

He concludes: “Do you really think we need America to come help us fight Hamas? They don’t even have a tank.”

The people in power need our energy to effect their games. Without our buy in, their power starts to fade. In fact, it is fading now. This is a desperate play. As Steve Bannon says, “this is the primal scream of a dying regime.” They are making one mistake after another. They are being caught in every jurisdiction, at every level. When they and their endless stupid wars are stopped, prosperity and growth and above all civic peace, can return.

I want them on trial, in public, until everyone sees the breadth and depth of their betrayals. A generational duty. I envy the people whose mission this will be. (read more)

*
*
* *
* *
*
See also:
https://carolineglick.com/ehud-baraks-complicated-position-in-israeli-politics-and-industry/

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/intelligence-failures-monday-october

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2023/11/activating-the-genocide-convention/

Israeli helicopter shot civilians at 7 October rave, police find
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/israeli-helicopter-shot-civilians-7-october-rave-police-find

Israeli lawmakers scream at family members of captives
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/maureen-clare-murphy/israeli-lawmakers-scream-family-members-captives

The evidence Israel killed its own citizens on 7 October
https://electronicintifada.net/content/evidence-israel-killed-its-own-citizens-7-october/41156

Israeli child “burned completely” by Israeli tank fire at kibbutz
https://electronicintifada.net/content/israeli-child-burned-completely-israeli-tank-fire-kibbutz/41706

Israeli forces shot their own civilians, kibbutz survivor says
“They eliminated everyone, including the hostages.”
https://electronicintifada.net/content/israeli-forces-shot-their-own-civilians-kibbutz-survivor-says/38861

http://www.globalresearch.ca/israeli-rabbi-asks-settlers-to-poison-palestinian-water-in-order-to-kill-them/5532463

http://www.globalresearch.ca/netanyahu-government-reviving-the-greater-israel-scheme/5524057

https://www.jonathan-cook.net/2023-11-21/israel-goals-lies-1948-gaza/

https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/inept-zionists-slaughtered-own-people

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20231122-ayelet-shaked-makes-provocative-statements-on-relocating-population-in-gaza/

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2023/10/biden-forced-to-call-off-his-plans-for-ethenic-cleansing-of-gaza.html#more

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/leaked-israeli-plan-to-ethnically-cleanse-gaza

https://thegrayzone.com/2023/10/27/israels-military-shelled-burning-tanks-helicopters/

*
Hamas is a Cold War creation and was founded by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin (and funded by Israel) in 1987, at the start of the First Intifada, to oppose the secular, nationalist Fatah organization, run by Yasser Arafat. The group is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Hamas then opposed the peace efforts between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization, and opposed the Oslo Accords when rival Fatah renounced violence and recognized the existence of Israel as part of a two-state solution.
[...]
Qatar was the cutout, but will be hard to attack Doha as the al-Thani have the receipts and, if necessary, will disclose everything via Al-Jazeera which is more credible in the region (and much of the world) than any American or Israeli spokesman sputtering, “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”It was good while it lasted and, in 2019, Netanyahu put it out there: “Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas,” Netanyahu told his Likud party’s Knesset members in March 2019. “This is part of our strategy.”

And don’t just take BiBi’s word for it.

Israeli historian Adam Raz reports that Netanyahu’s policy from 2009 is “on the one hand, bolstering the rule of Hamas in the Gaza Strip, and, on the other, weakening the Palestinian Authority.” As a result, he turned Hamas “from a terror organization with few resources into a semi-state body.” To that end, Netanyahu allowed cash deliveries by Qatari envoys to Gaza (especially important after the Palestinian Authority cut off Hamas from further funding), leaked a top-secret military report on the potential repercussions of conquering Gaza to derail the diplomatic strategy of the previous Israeli government, and “continuously thwarted all the targeted assassinations [of Hamas leaders].”

Netanyahu’s strategy was similar to Iran’s strategy as Tehran pays over $100 million a year to Palestinian groups, including Hamas, Palestine Islamic Jihad, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command, according to the U.S. State Department.

And the Hamas charter is clear about its goals, so a violent confrontation was inevitable, despite Hamas’s double-dipping.

Israel should have learned from America’s experience with the Afghan mujaheddin where a useful, well-funded vessel turned on its creator.

https://www.unz.com/article/hamas-israels-golem/
*

https://www.unz.com/article/hamas-winning-battle-for-gaza/

https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/experts-agree-hamas-is-winning/

https://www.unz.com/runz/pro-israel-propaganda-lies-vs-reality/

https://www.unz.com/runz/war-crimes-and-atrocity-hoaxes-in-the-israel-gaza-conflict/

The EU brought to its knees by the Straussians
https://www.voltairenet.org/article217976.html

The coup d’état of the Straussians in Israel
https://www.voltairenet.org/article218957.html

https://x.com/VincentCrypt46/status/1716088629024461046?s=20


2023-11-25 e
KILLING THEIR MORTAL ENEMY?

CONGRESSIONAL
JEW DECLARES THAT TRUMP,
"HAS TO BE ELIMINATED."



BREAKING: In case you missed this today, Democratic Congressman @RepDanGoldman went on
Jen Psaki (@jrpsaki) show today to declare that TRUMP "HAS TO BE ELIMINATED." WATCH pic.twitter.com/qUU4e9s69r


— Simon Ateba (@simonateba) November 20, 2023


2023-11-25 d
KILLING THE EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO WESTERN CIVILIZATION

MANY CULTURES ARE INCOMPATIBLE WITH
EUROPEAN & AMERICAN CULTURES.

The Khazar Bolsheviks are sending Mohammedans by the millions to
Europe & America to destabilize, then destroy Western Civilization.



No, We’re NOT All The Same

There's a little chestnut -- a fraud -- that nobody wishes to talk about that comes down to two words: Magic Dirt.

It is the premise that one can take the thug out of the hood and he will become not a thug.

It underlies most of the wildly-false beliefs that many run on immigration, for example.  Exceptions do not prove the rule; they are, in fact, exceptions.

Immigration from Western Europe mostly worked for America because Western Europeans and Americans share common values in large part.  That's largely because we were them before they came here, and while there are variation the basics are about the same when it comes to culture.  I'm talking about very basic things, such as, for example, the value of human life.

This didn't happen magically; it happened because that part of the world required it thousands of years ago or everyone would die.  There's this thing called "winter" and if you didn't cooperate with others to some degree and prepare for it you would not live through it.  The mortality rate of someone attempting "no contact, no community" living was extremely high and only a reasonable modicum of cooperation helped.

Thus it was over the space of thousands of years.

In sub-Saharan Africa -- not so much.  Ditto in many other parts of the world.  But this was not just about the environment; it was also about inculcation and it is true in most of the rest of the world by population.  Those who have never dealt with non-Western folks to any degree beyond perhaps a vacation overseas have no idea at all how these differences bear on how different groups of people think at very basic levels -- such as, for example once again, the value of human life.

Taking someone from one of those other parts of the world and transporting them here to America, or to Europe, does not change those core beliefs, values and inculcated behavior patterns.  There is no "magic dirt" that will do that and in fact, unless someone is a very young child, it may not even be possible to change that part of someone's psyche.

If you talk with people who have dealt with the horrors of war in Iraq or Afghanistan, for example, they'll tell you this.  The people there don't see killing you as a necessary part of a war effort -- they actually enjoy it and celebrate your death if they can pull it off.  The same is true in many other parts of the world.  Rwanda is a great example; they had a civil war and over a half-million civilians were slaughtered, and roughly as many women were raped, in a mere 100 days starting in April of 1994 with most of the killing conducted literally by hand with machetes.  It was an unspeakable and unbelievable level of brutality beyond anything you can, as a Western person, imagine -- and on a per-unit-of-time basis arguably one of the worst, if not the worst, mass-slaughter man has witnessed.

They thought nothing of it at all; the assassination of one of their leaders set it off but it had been planned in advance -- you don't exactly distribute huge numbers of machetes, way beyond what you need to tend crops, without thinking about their intended use in severing heads.

Mexican and other Central and South American gang members are of similar mindsets.  They have no respect for life whatsoever and never will.  Believing you can change this will simply get you killed and they will think nothing of it.  There is a decent argument that much of this is inherently in many of the people's blood from that part of the world and dates all the way back to before Cortez.  You're not going to change that in months or even years; it in fact hasn't changed in the 500 years since Cortez came to the Americas!

There is much debate about "nature .v. nurture" in human development but we know much less on the truths of that topic than we think we do.  The current Speaker of the House took in a black youth yet despite giving him a "good" upbringing he reverted back to criminal activity and association from others within his past and he was taken in before he had personally turned to crime as an adolescent.  His exposure to positive influence and nurture didn't change that.

People can certainly change but they have to want to and further that which is within you and is contrary to that desire has to be overcome. This doesn't mean some cannot find success in such an endeavor but if you're going to claim that you cannot treat all based on some percentage of the individuals then that has to apply the other way around too in that the presumption must not be that all are good when we know that across various parts of the world shared values and beliefs at a core level for many are absolutely incompatible with Western European and American society.

Look at what Germany is facing now.  They asked for this; they admitted into their nation huge numbers of people who did not share German values and in fact they always did and still do seek to overthrow the existing Constitutional government -- and if they can make enough offspring who they will inculcate with THEIR set of values they will do exactly that.

They have made clear they will not stop in their endeavor so other than by killing them or throwing them out what other options beyond surrender do you have?  You can choose to not take their threats seriously but that would be rather stupid, wouldn't it?

It would have been better to not let them in originally, don't you think?

Israel has established itself as a Jewish state.  They have no intention of allowing enough Muslims to be citizens who could, by "democratic process", remove the "Jewish State" status from their government and impose a Sharia-based government in its place.

Do you fault them for this position?

Are you willing to let something like that happen here in America?  I would hope not but if you think that America is endowed with some form of magic that will prevent it you're wrong.  Only by refusing to permit such a concentration to exist, and yes, that means exactly what you think it does, can such be prevented if there are those who you are willing to admit into the country that hold this set of beliefs.

Core beliefs -- culture, if you will -- matters.

All humans are not the same, and no, taking a human from one place to another does not change who they are.  If you do not insist that only those willing to assimilate into the existing culture, not change it to be what theirs is, are the only people you admit for residency and ultimately citizenship including any woman who can potentially bear and raise such a child, you are at risk of exactly what has been done all over the world throughout history and is being attempted right now in both Germany and Israel.

It can happen here and if it does everything you think of as America when it comes to our Constitution and Civil Rights is GONE.

Further, if you think this isn't at the core of the Israeli/Palestinian issue you're dead wrong.

That is first, foremost and all it is actually about and unless you want that sort of problem here you better recognize it and put a stop to admitting those into our nation who will not in fact become American, but wish to change America to suit their cultural desires and demands, and make clear that any who are currently here for other than tourism purposes yet refuse to become American and adopt our values must leave -- and mean it.

Merely being present here will not change a thing and if birthright citizenship is permitted then the only way to prevent this destruction is to absolutely bar from entry and immediately deport if already present those who have or display any indication of such an intent along with placing into law sufficient guards to prevent deception in this regard.

You may not like this and find it repugnant, but that you don't like it doesn't make it untrue.

It is true. (read more)

*
IGNORANT MORONS WHO "DON'T KNOW NUTHIN' ABOUT HISTORY"
ARE ANOTHER THREAT TO THE SURVIVAL OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION



"Western civilization was birthed in the Holy Land," says @RonDeSantis
pic.twitter.com/mUV7KTEeY1


— The Daily Signal (@DailySignal) November 18, 2023

2023-11-25 c
KILLING THE AMERICAN GOOSE THAT LAID THE GOLDEN EGG OF PROSPERITY, LIBERTY & FREEDOM
 
THE BOLSHEVIKS MUST BE STOPPED IN 2024


Understand what time it is in America:

• Trump is being prosecuted by Biden’s regime + multiple state level Democrats

• Every agency in government has been weaponized to investigate @elonmusk because he’s trying to level the playing field online to empower citizens

• Newsweek just broke the story that the FBI is both investigating Trump voters and treating them like terrorists by using the same types of tools they used against ISIS

• DHS and CISA used proxies to censor influencers like me and @charliekirk11 for opposing Democrats too effectively

• Grandma’s (including one with cancer) who thought they were allowed in the Capitol after police waved them in were thrown in prison over January 6th despite zero violence

• Soros DA’s are releasing pedophiles and criminals to carry out record crime

• Over 7 MILLION illegal immigrants have entered our country under Biden — Only 14 states have populations > 7.4M

• Schools are grooming kids about so called social justice, gender identity and sexual topics (including books with porn in them) while hiding all of it from parents

• People fear saying they vote Republican despite Republicans winning the 2022 popular vote because they know they can lose their jobs over it or be ostracized

• Doctors are giving kids sex changes with the full support of the White House including on children of our troops

• Doctors lose their licenses over disagreeing with the narrative of the Democrats

• Banks, Big Tech and online transaction services have banned prominent influencers for the crime of being conservative

• Inflation and interest rates are destroying our economy in ways that we’ll be dealing with for over a decade

• 80-90% of Congress represent their own interests and lobbyists instead of people

• Big Tech companies manipulate what the public sees to sell the Democrats narrative

• Soldiers were fired by the thousands for being conservatives who didn’t want the COVID jab — They even denied chaplains religious exemptions

• People are put through public struggle sessions if they say men can’t be women

• The DOJ and Democrat DA’s are deploying lawfare to bankrupt prominent Trump officials and supporters — “the process is the punishment”

• College kids won’t get into schools if they express any conservative views and many will be failed in classes if professors find out they’re conservative

• Parents were treated like terrorists by Merrick Garland and the DOJ for protesting school boards over COVID and the sexualization of children

• Professional programs to become doctors and nurses are adding steps to screen for ideology to eliminate conservatives: Many do it in sneaky ways (doctors do this with requirements to get the COVID vax in order to get a residency)

• Some states passed laws to take custody from parents who don’t affirm the new gender identity of their kids and even legalized kids running away to their state to get an abortion or sex change

• BLM and Antifa members received multi million dollar settlements after burning down cities with riots and looting for a year because they’re modern day brown shirts that the Democrats had to reward to ensure they do it again in the future

Our future is closer to Russia under Stalin, Cuba under Castro, China under Mao or Venezuela under Maduro than we are to the ideals of our constitution. We’re living through the intentional destruction of the country we know and love. Why? Because communism never becomes reality without chaos, destruction and separating kids from their parents.

America won’t survive unless Republican politicians get serious and recognize how far down the road to hell we are. It’s not time for Fox News hits where you get the one liner off that you hope to fundraise off of. It’s not time for another hearing that goes nowhere. It’s time to use EVERY lever of power you have to crush these new age communists and yes I mean communists.

It’s time to be ruthless.



Understand what time it is in America:


• Trump is being prosecuted by Biden’s regime + multiple state level Democrats

• Every agency in government has been weaponized to investigate @elonmusk because he’s trying to level the playing field online to empower citizens

•…

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) October 6, 2023


2023-11-25 b
KILLING BUSINESS-AS-USUAL IN ARGENTINA

MAKE ARGENTINA GREAT AGAIN


Meet Argentina’s new President Javier Milei. First thing you need to know: He absolutely can’t stand leftists.

Congrats to Argentina!! pic.twitter.com/svTIlQUB0E

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) November 19, 2023

*

Argentina’s new President:

• Anti-Woke
 • Anti-globalist
 • Anti-abortion
 • Anti-climate change
 • Anti-Central Banking System
 • Anti-socialism

• Pro-gun
 • Pro-family
 • Pro-education
 • Pro-US Dollar

pic.twitter.com/nu3MNL7Tc3

— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) November 20, 2023

*
 
MAKE ARGENTINA GREAT AGAIN! pic.twitter.com/OhDEjMQvXj

— Donald J. Trump Posts From His Truth Social (@TrumpDailyPosts) November 20, 2023

*
 
Congratulations to Javier Milei on a great race for President of Argentina. The whole world was watching! I am very proud of you. You will turn your Country around and truly Make Argentina Great Again!
 
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/111440038805302597

*
See also: 


2023-11-25 a
KIL
LING NET-ZERO & ESG

"Now ESG is failing. Market leaders say it is facing "a perfect storm of
negative sentiment" and its U.S. investments fell by $163 billion in the first
quarter of 2023 alone.
Its stepchild, Net-Zero, is so loathed, it looks like it
might blow up the entire carbon scam."


Deplorables killed Net-Zero and ESG. I Know! Let's Steal the National Parks!


A New Threat Rises from the Criminal Cartel that Farms Us for Profit.

Delayed but not stopped, the U.S. government is planning a rule that allows for America’s protected lands, including parks and wildlife refuges, to be listed on the N.Y. Stock Exchange. Natural Asset Companies (NACs) will be owned, managed, and traded by companies like BlackRock, Vanguard, and even China.

The deadline was Friday, but earlier this week, the deadline was postponed until January. This is the usual criminal feint from the environmental movement and the administrative state. People are complaining? Let’s put it off till they go back to sleep. Then we will steal their birthright late at night, in precisely the manner we have stolen everything else.

Since the early 2000’s, outfits like Goldman Sachs have been trying to trade air, or specifically carbon without much success. Their 2005 carbon exchange staggered along until it was quietly discontinued, and their Climate Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) is now facing delisting. "ESG" was the next attempt to monetize the un-monetizable, with the "E" part of that acronym standing for Environment, ill-defined as that was. Now ESG is failing. Market leaders say it is facing "a perfect storm of negative sentiment" and its U.S. investments fell by $163 billion in the first quarter of 2023 alone.

Its stepchild, Net-Zero, is so loathed, it looks like it might blow up the entire carbon scam. Says Australian senator Matt Canavan, "Net-Zero has absolutely carked it. It is a soundbite and totally insane. Almost everything we grow, we make, we do in our society relies on the use of fossil fuels." Vanguard has pulled out of Net-Zero funds. The British government too is backing out of Net-Zero, saying "we won't save the planet by bankrupting the British people." New Zealand’s new government revised the country's Net-Zero plans in its first week in office. In the hard hit Netherlands, the Farmer-Citizen movement is now the dominant party in the Dutch senate and every provincial assembly. Sweden has abandoned its 100 percent Net-Zero plans and Norway has announced another $18 billion in oil and gas investments.

Even in the submissive E.U. voters are turning from the "green" parties toward anti-E.U. parties. Renewables funds are seeing massive outflows because of rising interest rates and declining subsidies. Of course, the massive subsidies taxpayers have already given both "renewables" investors and "renewables" companies will never be clawed back. All we will get is a shrug as they move onto the next kill. Which is so obvious it is a wonder no one predicted it.

The entire universe envies the lush interior of the U.S. Increasingly empty, it is filled with a cornucopia of minerals, fiber, food, waters, extraordinarily fertile soil as well as well-ordered, educated, mostly docile people. Worth in the quadrillions, if one could monetize and trade it, financialize it, the way the market has financialized the future labor of Americans, well, it would be like golden coins raining from the sky.

On October 4th, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a proposed rule to create Natural Asset Companies (NACs). A twenty-one day comment period was allowed, which is half the minimum number of days generally required and when they postponed passing the rule, they did not extend the comment period. “Nope, shut up,” they said.

NACs will allow BlackRock, Bill Gates, and possibly even China to hold the ecosystem rights to the land, water, air, and natural processes of the properties enrolled in NACs. Each NAC will hold “management authority” over the land. When we are issued carbon allowances, owners of said lands will be able to claim tax deductions and will be able to sell carbon allowances to businesses, families and townships. In the simplest of terms, that's where the money will be made. WE peons will be renting air from the richest people on earth.

The following are eligible for NACs: National Parks, National Wildlife Refuges, Wilderness Areas, Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, Conservation Areas on Private and Federal Lands, Endangered Species Critical Habitat, and the Conservation Reserve Program. Lest you think that any conserved land is conserved in your name, the largest Conservation organization in the U.S., is called The Nature Conservancy, or TNC, which, while being a 501(c)3, also holds six billion dollars of land on its books. Those lands have been taken using your money via donations and government grants, and transferred to the Nature Conservancy, which can do with those lands what it wills.

If this rule passes, America's conserved lands and parks will move onto the balance sheets of the richest people in the world. Management of those lands will be decided by them and their operations, to say the least, will be opaque.

μολὼν λαβέ, buddy.

Farm country is fighting back. American Stewards of Liberty, Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, Kansas Natural Resource Coalition, Financial Fairness Alliance and Blue Ribbon Coalition have filed comments, Republican senators Pete Ricketts, James Risch and Mike Crapo have sent pointed queries to the SEC. This week, Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-WY) offered an amendment that would defund the SEC proposed rule to approve listing "NACs."

Most of us ill-understand "financialization." It is a complex set of maneuvers best explained by the behavior that crashed the economy in 2008 which bundled up questionable mortgages and brokered off the risk to dozens of different funds in order to share that risk. NACs are asset grabs. From '09-'20, funds asset-stripped America's manufacturing via debt obligations, buying the company, selling off the equipment, firing the most expensive employees, and gutting, if they could, pension funds. Then they upped the price and sold on the assets. Which were bundled and brokered off. These are called collateralized debt obligations and they thunder doom underneath the debt-fueled economy.

Natural Asset Companies are an attempt to grab hard assets to make up for an inevitable collapse. But taking more land out of production makes it certain that collapse moves ever closer. Land needs to be used, cared for, and maintained by the people who live on and use the land. Otherwise, it runs to desert and invasive species. The mad push to "green" and net-zero has triggered financialization, or a brokering of the future, because only energy spurs real growth -- and energy has been increasingly restricted over the past twenty years. NACs are another destroyer of America's heartland.

AmericanStewards.us is running the campaign against it, and you can find ways to help on their site. (read more)


2023-11-24 e
S
LOUCHES TOWARDS HYPERINFLATION

LAUREN BOEBERT ASKS A QUESTION.
Affirmative action Negress hasn't a good answer. 



This Is Crazy. The Director of the United States Office of Management and Budget, Shalanda Young, Doesn’t Know What Causes Inflation. How Do These People Get Their Jobs?

Young “Sure the cost of goods are more expensive. It costs more for the same goods than it did last year. The president is very aware of that. That is why it called on Congress to send him legislation that reduced the cost of health care.”

Rep Lauren Boebert (@laurenboebert) “That's not exactly where I was getting at. Let me answer this for you. So Milton Freeman, who won the Nobel Prize in economics, said that inflation comes from too much money being printed in DC. Specifically, and I quote, he said, is a result of too much money and more rapid increase in the quantity of money than in output. Moreover, in the modern Era, the important next step to recognize that today, governments control the quantity of money so that as a result, inflation in the United States is made in Washington and nowhere else. So Director Young, in short, inflation comes from Washington, DC, where the products we use aren't created, but the products we use are made more expensive.

Director Young, shamefully, this Biden budget proposes the largest tax increase in American history. And I really think that that bears repeating. It is the largest in American history. The Biden regime either has no concept of how inflation is impacting Americans or simply has no concept for Americans who find the cost of gasoline too expensive because after all they can't just go buy a Tesla. How about that for Democrat priorities? Thank you, Madam Director.”


This Is Crazy. The Director of the United States Office of Management and Budget, Shalanda Young, Doesn’t Know What Causes Inflation. How Do These People Get Their Jobs?

Young “Sure the cost of goods are more expensive. It costs more for the same goods than it did last year. The… pic.twitter.com/O4U25BNcfs

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) November 19, 2023


2023-11-24 d
SLOUCHES TOWARDS HYPOCRISY

“Nimrata Randhawa wants me to use my real name.”
So, why does she persist in calling herself Nikki?
Who is Nimrata trying to fool?


Nimrata

*
See also: https://thefederalist.com/2023/10/03/nikki-rodham-haley-the-hillary-clinton-of-the-gop/

 
2023-11-24 c
SLOUCHES TOWARDS SEXUALIZATION OF YOUTH

Protocol №14, paragraph 5:
IN COUNTRIES KNOWN AS PROGRESSIVE AND ENLIGHTENED WE
HAVE CREATED A SENSELESS, FILTHY, ABOMINABLE LITERATURE. 



2023-11-24 b

SLOUCHES TOWARDS CLEAN ELECTIONS

"If you cannot cross search property rolls,
you cannot clean voter rolls. Period."
However, this is merely an interim solution.

We must ultimately have poll books on paper - a physical, not a digital record.
(This requires smaller precincts.)
Digitized records are records that can be altered or tampered by anyone, anywhere.
Also, America should return to paper ballots counted at each precinct & one day voting
with early or off-premise voting only for overseas military or hospitalized voters.



This week the Fractal team started our 24th state comparison of property tax rolls with the voter rolls – the results are astounding!
 
If you cannot cross search property rolls, you cannot clean voter rolls. Period.
 
We are finding streets, in one state, cities, that literally do not exist – but are on voter rolls, with thousands of FAKE voters.
 
24 state teams, working with their legislators, building a real time view of their voter rolls cross searched against property rolls and FEC and other government rolls!
 
We created a video of several Georgia counties we are posting soon. You will see Fractal at work at Georgia counties – showing extraordinary detail on anomalies in that state’s voter rolls.
 
We show videos from every current state showing the power of cross search with property tax records as the teams make them available. In addition to property tax records, we added several national government databases.
 
Previously we were accepting data for only one or two counties in each state for the cross compares. We are now taking ALL counties – in every state!
 
Recent funding and some incredible Fractal innovation enable us to ingest the property tax records for all 3,200 U.S. counties. Contact us and we will bring your county into the mix.
 
We have documents created by the FracPack (current state users) showing how to gather the appropriate data. County assessors are working with us across the country to build the database.
 
In two cases, they asked if we could replace their current obsolete SQL system!
 
Send us an email via Omega4America.com and we will send out the dox to get you started.
 
We now have one Unites States Senator, two state legislatures and a huge Republican think tank going with Fractal.
 
Let’s get all the data – for every state – every U.S. county and build the world’s largest address database – cross searched with A.I. technology at 200 million transactions per second.
 
This will be a national resource to clean voter rolls, all government rolls and finally give citizens transparency to their official, public records.
 
Regards,
 
Jay
Omega4America.com

*
RELATED:

THIS, FOR EXAMPLE, IS WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN GEORGIA:

2020
                                                          Georgia fraud


2023-11-24 a

SLOUCHES TOWARDS J6 JUSTICE

THANKSGIVING IN THE AWAKENING AMERICA

a J6 Thanksgiving

THANKSGIVING IN THE FORMER AMERICA
Thanksgiving


2023-11-23 b
SLOUCHES TOWARDS SOCIALISM

The lesson is — The True Story of Thanksgiving is — that William Bradford and his Pilgrim community were thanking God for the blessings on their community after the first miserable winter of a documented failure brought on by their attempt at fairness and equality, which was socialism.


‘Long Before Karl Marx’ the Pilgrims Experimented with Socialism: Rush Limbaugh’s True Story of Thanksgiving Revisited

Rush Limbaugh left us nearly three years ago after succumbing to a bout with cancer.

The absence of his voice from the airwaves is sorely missed, especially in the precarious era of Biden.

Throughout his more than three decades as a fixture for conservatives on the radio, Limbaugh maintained an annual tradition of retelling the “true” story of Thanksgiving during his last broadcast before the Thanksgiving holiday.

Limbaugh’s version of events first appeared in his book, “See, I Told You So,” and proclaimed the origins of Thanksgiving had been mischaracterized over the years.

During his 2020 Thanksgiving Eve show, Limbaugh explained the real success story of the Pilgrims stems from their rejection of a socialist form of governance.

Transcript as follows (courtesy of RushLimbaugh.com):

LIMBAUGH: So my second book was “See, I Told You So.” The first book is “The Way Things Ought to Be” and the second book is “See, I Told You So.” “Chapter 6, Dead White Guys, or What the History Books Never Told You: The True Story of Thanksgiving.”

Now, normally what I do is simply read from my first book. But there has now been another book added in the Rush Revere series, and the first Rush Revere book is Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims. These are children books that were written to help young people get the true stories of America’s founding because so little of it is actually correctly taught.

In the children’s book version, Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims, I went into a little bit more detail about the Indians, the Native Americans who helped the arriving Pilgrims and what that story actually is and how the True Story of Thanksgiving has been obscured by what is taught — what I was taught, you were probably taught. Here’s the version you were probably taught:

The Pilgrims arrived here after an arduous trip across the Atlantic Ocean. They didn’t know why they were, had no idea what to do. They had nothing. The Indians took pity on them. The Indians saw them, and the Indians saved them. The Indians taught ’em how to do things they didn’t know how to do, like grow food, catch beavers, stuff like that.

The Indians saved them, and the Pilgrims thanked them by growing a whole bunch of food and having this big feast. So the story of Thanksgiving that’s taught is basically how without the Native Americans there wouldn’t be a country because the Pilgrims would have died. At least the Pilgrims were nice enough to pay the Indians back with a big Thanksgiving dinner.

That’s not at all what happened. It’s not even close to what happened, which is why I decided to write about it. Now, in the Revere book — the children’s book, as I say — I went into greater detail about some of the Native Americans who provided assistance to the arriving Pilgrims, particularly a young native by the name of Squanto.

Now, I’m doing show prep today, and I come across a story in the Federalist. I quote from this website all the time, and I’m reading this story here, and by the way, folks, it is… (chuckles) I don’t know. It’s right out of the Rush Revere book, and it’s right out of my See, I Told You So book. There’s a whole lot of discussion here of Squanto, who he was, what he did, how he helped, the details.

The point is The True Story of Thanksgiving is spreading, and I couldn’t be happier about that. Bottom line: It is spreading. I’m just gonna cut to the chase here before getting into reading the text. The Real Story of Thanksgiving, going back to the very first early days of the Pilgrims arriving at Plymouth Rock, is that socialism failed.

This is crucially important today, because we have just elected a Democrat Party that is going to implement socialism if they win these two seats in Georgia, and they’re gonna try regardless. But if they win those two seats in Georgia, you can say good-bye to the United States as you know it. It will become a socialist state. It will begin the process of becoming…

Well, we’re way down the road towards it anyway. So it is crucially important here for people to understand this. It’s not antiquated. It’s not a cliche. It’s not something that you can make fun of people about. You know, it used to be when I first started this show in the late eighties, early nineties, if you dared to refer to the Soviet Union as “communist,” people made fun of you.

“Ah, come on, Rush! You see a communist behind every rock,” and they tried to ridicule you out of identifying communists and communism. Castro, the ChiComs. I never buckled, but a lot of people did — and they’re doing it now. If you say, “The United States, the Democrat Party’s on the pathway to socialism,” they make fun of you. They mock you.

“Come on! You don’t believe that. You can’t believe that! That’s just silly,” and they try to mock you and make fun of you, to silence you. But, folks, it’s real. Now… “The story of the Pilgrims begins in the early part of the seventeenth century… The Church of England under King James I was persecuting anyone and everyone who did not recognize [the church’s] absolute civil and spiritual authority,” actually, the state.

“Those who challenged ecclesiastical authority and those who believed strongly in freedom of worship were hunted down…” This is in England in the 1600s. They “were hunted down and imprisoned, and sometimes executed for their beliefs. A group of separatists,” people who didn’t want any part of this, “first fled to Holland,” they liked wooden shoes and cheese, “and established a community.”

They were there for eleven years. “After eleven years, about forty of” these separatists who liked wooden shoes and cheese, “agreed to make a perilous journey to the New World…” They had heard about it. Some new, exciting place that hadn’t been developed. They knew they would “face hardships,” hardships like you and I don’t know — and I’m not preaching to you.

I’m just telling you, we don’t know the hardship these people endured. We can’t. We are way too advanced now. People who lived in the 1600s would not believe life today. (Snort!) Try to explain flight, jet travel. They wouldn’t understand it. They knew they would “face hardships,” but paramount importance to them was living freely and worshiping God according to the dictates of their own consciences, their own beliefs.

That’s what they were denied the freedom to do in England. “On August 1, 1620, the Mayflower set sail. It carried a total of 102 passengers, including forty” of these separatists, the Pilgrims. There were just 40 of them. They were “led by William Bradford. On the journey” across the Atlantic… You talk about something that had to be frightening and scary?

The Mayflower was not much bigger than a 50-foot boat, and 102 people on it. “On the journey, Bradford set up an agreement, a contract” if you will, “that established just and equal laws for all [40] members of the [Pilgrim] community, irrespective of their religious beliefs.” It didn’t matter what their religious beliefs were.

These are the laws they were all agreeing to live by. “Where did the revolutionary ideas,” these laws, come from? We’re talking about the Mayflower Compact. That is what Bradford wrote. The Mayflower Compact derived “[f]rom the Bible. The Pilgrims were a people completely steeped in the lessons of the Old and New Testaments.”

They were devoutly religious people. No matter what else is said about them (and even that is denied), they were devoutly religious. “They looked to the ancient Israelites for their example. And, because of the biblical precedents set forth in Scripture, they never doubted that their experiment would work.”

They never doubted they would get to the New World. They never doubted that once they got there, they would thrive. The journey was long; it was arduous; it was dangerous. And when they finally landed, when the Pilgrims finally landed in New England in November, according to William Bradford’s detailed journal, they found a cold, barren, desolate wilderness. Imagine New England as it exists today as nothing but rocks, forest, undeveloped nature in November and getting colder.

There were no friends to greet them. There was no shelter of any kind other than hiding under a tree, there was nothing, folks. It was desolate. There were no hotels. There were no inns. There were no places to clean up. There were no houses. I mean, this was real hardship. The sacrifice that they had made for the freedom to worship was just beginning.

During that first winter — remember, they arrive in November — during that first winter, half of them, including William Bradford’s own wife, died of starvation, of sickness, exposure to the elements. Now we’re getting close to what you were taught in school. When spring finally came — and, by the way, writing that doesn’t do it justice. Spring didn’t just finally come. It was a survival. It was an act of survival that you and I cannot possibly relate to or understand.

American Special Forces can. Military people who’ve been trained can understand what the Pilgrims were — you and I can’t. We’ve never done anything like that first winter in the New World. They survived it. Spring finally came. They did meet the Indians, the Native Americans who were there, who did help them in planting corn and fishing for cod. They showed ’em where the beavers were so the beavers could be skinned for coats, other things. You animal rights people are not gonna like some of this story, but it happened.

But even at this, even with this degree of assistance from the Indian, the Native Americans, there wasn’t any prosperity yet. They had the Mayflower Compact. They had these laws they were living by, and there was no prosperity. And I wonder why. Now, this is important to understand here, folks, because this is where modern American history lessons end, with the Indians teaching the Pilgrims how to eat, how to fish, how to skin beavers, and all that.

That’s where it ends. And that’s the feel-good story. But that doesn’t even get close to the true story. You know, Thanksgiving is actually explained in some textbooks as a holiday for which the Pilgrims gave thanks to the Indians for saving their lives. It wasn’t that. That happened, but Thanksgiving was a devout expression of gratitude, the Pilgrims, to God for their survival, and everything that was a part of it.

Now, here’s the part that has been omitted. The original contract the Pilgrims entered into in Holland — they had sponsors. They didn’t have the money to do this trip on their own. They had sponsors. There were merchant sponsors in London and in Holland. And these merchant sponsors demanded that everything that the Pilgrims produced in the New World would go into a common store, a single bank, if you will. And that each member of the Pilgrim community was entitled to one share.

So everybody had an equal share of whatever was in that bank. All of the land they cleared, all of the houses they built belonged to that bank, to the community as well. And they were going to distribute it equally, because they were gonna be fair. So all of the land that they cleared and all the houses they built belonged to everybody. Belonged to the community. Belonged to the bank, belonged to the common store. Nobody owned anything. They just had an equal share in it. It was a commune.

The Pilgrims established a commune, essentially. Forerunner of the communes we saw in the sixties and seventies out in California. They even had their own organic vegetables, by the way. Yep. The Pilgrims, forerunners of organic vegetables. Of course, what else could there be? No such thing as processed anything back then.

Now, William Bradford, who had become the governor of the colony ’cause he was the leader, recognized that this wasn’t gonna work. This was costly and destructive, and it just wasn’t working. It was collectivism. It was socialism. It wasn’t working. That first winner had taken a lot of lives. The manpower was greatly reduced. So William Bradford decided to take bold action, which I will describe when we get back.

(BREAK TRANSCRIPT)

LIMBAUGH: William Bradford, the governor of the Pilgrim community, saw that none of this was working. The Mayflower Compact was not working. Giving everybody a single share of stock in the common store, in the common bank was not working. Collectivism. It was as costly and destructive to the Pilgrims as it is and has been to anybody who has ever tried it.

So Bradford decided to scrub it. He threw it out and took bold action. He assigned a plot of land to each family. Every family was given a plot of land. They could work it, manage it however they wanted to. If they just wanted to sit on it, get fat, dumb, happy, and lazy, they could. If they wanted to develop it, if they wanted to grow corn, whatever on it, they could. If they wanted to build on it, they could do that. If they wanted to turn it into a quasi-business, they could do whatever they wanted to do with it.

He turned loose the power of the capitalist marketplace. Long before Karl Marx was even born. Long before Karl Marx was a sperm cell in his father’s dreams, the Pilgrims had discovered and experimented with what could only be described as socialism, and they found that it didn’t work. Now, it wasn’t called that then. But that’s exactly what it was. Everybody was given an equal share. You know what happened? Nobody did anything. There was no incentive. Nothing worked. Nothing happened.

“What Bradford and his community found was that the most creative and industrious people had no incentive to work any harder than anyone else, unless they could utilize the power of personal motivation! But while most of the rest of the world has been experimenting with socialism for well over a hundred years – trying to refine it, perfect it, and re-invent it – the Pilgrims decided early on to scrap it permanently. What Bradford wrote about this social experiment should be in every schoolchild’s history lesson. If it were, we might prevent much needless suffering,” if the true story of Thanksgiving had been taught for years and years and years.

(BREAK TRANSCRIPT)

LIMBAUGH: So William Bradford, after putting everybody in a common store, the Mayflower Compact… They wanted to be fair. They wanted everybody to have one common share of stock in everything that happened that the Pilgrims produced — and it bombed. It didn’t work.

There was no prosperity; there was no creativity because there was no incentive. Here’s what Bradford wrote about the failure: “‘For this community [so far as it was] was found to breed much confusion and discontent…’” They were not happy, on other words. “‘[T]his community was found to breed much confusion and discontent and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort.’”

In other words, nobody worked.

The way they set it up, killed and discouraged work.

There was no need.

“‘For young men that were most able and fit for labor and service’” sat around and did nothing. “‘[T]hey should spend their time and strength to work for other men’s wives and children without’” being paid for it? Why should they do that? So they didn’t. “‘[T]hat was thought injustice.’ Why should you work for other people when you can’t work for yourself? What’s the point? Do you hear what he was saying, ladies and gentlemen?

“The Pilgrims found that people could not be expected to do their best work without incentive. So what did Bradford’s community try next? They unharnessed the power of good old free enterprise by invoking” capitalism, “the principle of private property,” all the way back in the 1600s. It was incredible. “Every family was assigned its own plot of land,” and they could do with it whatever they wanted to do.

“‘This had very good success,’ wrote Bradford, ‘for it made all hands industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been.’” So when profit was introduced, when the opportunity to prosper was introduced, it went gangbusters. That, my friends, is the essence of the True Story of Thanksgiving. “Now, this is where it gets really good, folks, if you’re laboring under the misconception that I was, as I was taught in school.

“So they set up trading posts and exchanged goods with the Indians” after they had enjoyed this prosperity. It was not the Indians that brought them in prosperity. It’s not said to insult anybody. The Indians assisted in their arrival undeniably. But what led to prosperity for these original settlers was the common store failed. Socialism didn’t work.

It’s when they introduced what turns out to be capitalism. They didn’t have the name for it, but when they turned loose individual incentive — keep what you produce, sell what you don’t need — it went crazy. This is not something they were taught by anybody by self-experience. It was not the Indians. None of this is said to put anybody down. Don’t misunderstand.

The Indians did a lot of things that helped them, which I’ll get to in just a second, but it was their own industriousness. “[T]hey set up trading posts and exchanged goods with the Indians.” They sold stuff to them, and those “profits allowed them to pay off their debts to the merchants,” their sponsors in London and in Holland, and you know what?

The success of that colony after they had abandoned socialism and tried what was essentially capitalism, the word spread throughout the Old World of this massive amount of prosperity that was there for the taking in the New World. And guess what happened? The New World was flooded with new arrivals. “[T]he success and prosperity of the Plymouth settlement attracted more Europeans and began what came to be known as the ‘Great Puritan Migration.’”

And all it took was prosperity and the word spreading across the Atlantic Ocean of how there was prosperity and it was there for the taking. All you had to do was get there and give it a shot. The lesson is — The True Story of Thanksgiving is — that William Bradford and his Pilgrim community were thanking God for the blessings on their community after the first miserable winter of a documented failure brought on by their attempt at fairness and equality, which was socialism.

It didn’t work.

Only when they abandoned it did it work — and I need to say again, because I don’t want people misunderstand and get noses out of joint. The Native Americans, the indigenous people, the Injuns, whatever you want to call ’em, they were of considerable assistance, and they were friendly when the Pilgrims arrived. But they had little, if anything, to do with the prosperity that occurred.

Because that was the result of Bradford and the Pilgrim leadership deciding to change their structure the Mayflower Compact. Now, Indians assisted, naturally. I can’t deny it. I mean, they taught them how to fish and this kind of thing that they didn’t know how to do, and that led them to be productive, undeniably so. But it was the Pilgrim community itself which experienced this massive prosperity.

The word of which spread all the way back to the Old World, Europe across the Atlantic Ocean.

Now, I mentioned earlier that The Federalist has a story on all this, and in it they describe much of what we did in the second book that dealt with this, the children’s book, Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims. That book goes into great detail about how the Indians did provide assistance and what kind of assistance it was, how valuable it was and how crucial it was.

In Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims, we focus on a Native American by the name of Squanto. Now, as I told you, “During the winter of 1620, only 44 out of the original 102 [Pilgrims] survived, including their first elected governor of the colony, John Carver,” and it was “an Indian named Squanto came to their rescue.” As I say, this is, as I say, explored in great detail in Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims.

“Squanto was no ordinary native. Early settlers in 1610 had captured him and sold him into slavery. A group of Catholic friars freed him and brought him to England, where he learned to speak English. In 1618, serving as an interpreter on an English ship, he was brought back to the New World.” It was Squanto — who is a famous Native American in his own right in the Pilgrim story. it was Squanto who “taught the Pilgrims how to plant and fish,” how to skin beavers. It was Squanto who “broker[ed] a peace treaty between the Pilgrims and other Indian tribes.”

There was more than one tribe of Indians. It was not copacetic. It was not friendly and at one with nature. It was not anything like the multiculturalists would have you believe. There were squabbles; there were power struggles; turf battles. It was human. The Indians, the Pilgrims, everybody was scrambling for power, for survival. Survivability was the name of the game. And it was not guaranteed.

Now, many of the Pilgrims literally believed that God had sent Squanto to save them. And they believed, the Pilgrims believed that without Squanto they never would have survived, or thrived. And they experienced a tremendous harvest in 1621, and that’s the big gathering that is taught in the history books, the native Indians and the Pilgrims joined together for a huge feast, which is the foundational story of the Thanksgiving story that’s taught in public schools.

But again, that is not The Real Story of Thanksgiving. That’s the textbook brand. It did happen, but it’s so much more than that. And I love taking the opportunity every year to explain the truth of, especially now given this election’s apparently, allegedly fallen out. Because even at the Federalist — this is so great that the story is spreading. “One of the most important legacies of early settlers is that they experimented with socialism in the 1620s, and it didn’t work. Private property rights and personal responsibility, two pillars of a free market economy, saved the Plymouth colony from extinction and laid the economic foundation for he free and prosperous nation that we all enjoy today.”

And that is exactly right. And that is The True Story of Thanksgiving. And that has been what should have been shared with you every Thanksgiving for the past 31 years.

(read more)


2023-11-23 a

SLOUCHES TOWARDS JERUSALEM

Conservative Christians who support U.S. military interventions and blindly support U.S. wars and military interventions and almost everything that the state of Israel does do so because they are warvangelicals, not because they are dispensationalists (again: or at least they claim to be or think they are or others think they are).

 
Warvangelicals, Dispensationalism and Israel

Most of my readers know that I am, unapologetically, a theologically conservative Christian, but perhaps not all of them realize that I am also a dispensationalist. But I am not just any run-of-the-mill dispensationalist. I am a scholastic dispsensationalist in the tradition of John F. Walvoord, Lewis Sperry Chafer, Charles C. Ryrie, Dwight Pentecost, and Alva J. McClain. I have a whole shelf of books in my library with all of the major and minor works on dispensationalism, including books critical of dispensationalism like that of my late friend Gary North. I also write for the Journal of Dispensational Theology. My dispensationalist bona fides are well known, and should be contrasted with the pop dispensationalism of Hal Lindsey, Tim LaHaye, Jerry Jenkins, and John Hagee that sees everything that happens in the Middle East as somehow related to biblical prophecy.

The current events in the Middle East are the impetus for this brief article, but I could have said what I am going to say anytime during the last twenty years that I have been writing about the subject of Christianity and war.

Many conservative Christians are dispensationalists (or at least they claim to be or think they are or others think they are). Many more conservative Christians blindly support U.S. wars and military interventions and almost everything that the state of Israel does. It is a mistake to blame this on dispensationalism.

Speaking as a dispensationalist—

There is nothing about dispensationalism that would lead me to confound the government of Israel with the people of Israel.

There is nothing about dispensationalism that would lead me to support collective punishment by Israel.

There is nothing about dispensationalism that would lead me to support indiscriminate bombing by Israel.

There is nothing about dispensationalism that would lead me to dismiss the killing of women and children by Israel as collateral damage.

There is nothing about dispensationalism that would lead me to support foreign aid to Israel. I oppose foreign aid to Israel because I oppose foreign aid to any country. If Christians in America want to help Israel, then I would say the same thing to them as I have said to Christians in America who want to help Ukraine: Send your own money.

There is nothing about dispensationalism that would lead me to believe that God needs the help of the United States to protect the nation of Israel.

There is nothing about dispensationalism that would lead me to believe that the return of the Jewish people to their ancient homeland is necessary before the return of Christ.

There is nothing about dispensationalism that would lead me to accuse critics of the government of Israel of being pro-Palestinian or anti-Jewish.

There is nothing about dispensationalism that would lead me to label those who mention the “Israel Lobby” or “Jewish influence” as anti-Semitic.

There is nothing about dispensationalism that would lead me to blindly support the actions of the Israeli government. I don’t support most of the actions any government (and especially the U.S. government).

There is nothing about dispensationalism that would lead me to support U.S. military intervention in the Middle East. The United States should remain neutral and not intervene militarily in any foreign region.

There is nothing about dispensationalism that would lead me to blindly support Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Among other things, he is a false prophet. Back in 2006, he said that the president of Iran was another Hitler and that Iran would get a nuke and threaten the world within five years. But after two terms as president of Iran, Mahmoud “Hitler” Ahmadinejad could not run again due to term limits and faded into obscurity. Netanyahu also once said “unless the United States stops Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, America has only two to five years left.” Well, the last time I looked, America was still here. Recently, Netanyahu has vowed to lead Israel to a “crushing victory” over Hamas and to “realize the prophecy of Isaiah.” He then selectively referred to Isaiah 60:18: “Violence shall no more be heard in thy land, wasting nor destruction within thy borders; but thou shalt call thy walls Salvation, and thy gates Praise.” Dispensationalists of all people should recognize that this is a prophecy of a future restored Israel that does not describe Israel today.

There is nothing about dispensationalism that would lead me to make such open-ended, blanket statements as “I stand with Israel” or “I support Israel.” What do these statements actually mean? Do they mean that I stand with Israel’s right to exist? Do they mean that I support the right of Israel to defend itself? I would certainly agree with both of those statements. But if that is what they mean, than that is what should be said. Just saying that you “stand with Israel” or that you “support Israel” could be taken to mean almost anything. Do conservative Christians support Israel’s annual gay pride parades in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv? Do conservative Christians stand with the Israeli government’s view toward Christian proselytizing in Israel? Do conservative Christians support the Israeli government expanding its Families of Fallen Soldiers Law to include the common-law partners of LGBTQ members of the Israel Defense Forces? Do conservative Christians stand with Israel’s draconian Covid policies during 2020 and 2021? Do conservative Christians support the 1967 attack on the USS Liberty by Israel?

All of these things being said, I am certainly not pro-Hamas, pro-Palestinian, or pro-Arab, so please don’t bother writing to accuse me of these things or chastise me for not being sufficiently pro-Israel. My unfavorable opinion of Islam is well known, and I will not get into it here. If someone wants to believe that Muhammad is God’s prophet, then so be it. I believe in freedom of conscience, even if the governments and religious leaders in Muslim countries don’t. When it comes to religion, you can believe anything you want, just so long as you don’t aggress against others that disagree, no matter what they say or write about your religious views or commit acts of violence against others in the cause of your religion.

Conservative Christians who support U.S. military interventions and blindly support U.S. wars and military interventions and almost everything that the state of Israel does do so because they are warvangelicals, not because they are dispensationalists (again: or at least they claim to be or think they are or others think they are).

I have written about the errors of these evangelical warvangelicals and their cousins Christian jihadists, Old Testament Christians, Christian armchair warriors, theological schizophrenics, Christian Coalition moralists, nuclear Christians, Janus Christians, Catholic just war theorists, reich-wing Christian nationalists, theocon Values Voters, imperial Christians, pro-lifers for mass murder, Red-State Christian fascists, bloodthirsty Christian conservatives, beam Christians, nuclear Christians, Christian Coalition moralists, double-minded Christians, Christian warmongers, God and country Christian bumpkins, sniper theologians, Christian military idolaters, conservative Christian militarists, and members of the Christian axis of evil for many years (see my list of articles on Christianity and war and my articles on Christianity and the military).

Although many have asked, I have no comments or recommendations to make about the events in the Middle East. There is no solution to the perpetual trouble there. There will be no peace in the Middle East until the return of the Prince of Peace. (read more)


2023-11-22 c
COLLATERAL DAMAGE III

ASSUMPTIONS FALL BY THE WAYSIDE



@bronzeagemantis Twitter


2023-11-22 b
COLLATERAL DAMAGE II

I do not want any Gazan children to be collateral damage. My Jewish values,
along with what I’ve learned advocating for Palestinian statehood, continue to affirm
my belief in the importance of upholding the rights of Palestinian civilians.



Hamas Killed My Wokeness

I’ve found a home on the progressive left for years—even after I noticed a common blind spot around Jewish issues. But the reaction to the murderous attacks on Israeli civilians was the final straw.

In high school in the early 2000s, I assumed the role of Palestine in our semesterlong “Model U.N.” class. It was, in part, a feeble act of rebellion against spending weekends at a Conservative synagogue during my angstiest years.

Although my comprehension of the Middle East conflict was in its infancy, an innate sense of justice drove me to defend the Palestinian cause. To characterize my choice as merely “rebellion,” then, doesn’t capture the full picture. My mother, a New Yorker with fierce feminist beliefs, raised me with quintessentially progressive Jewish values. I was taught that we, as Jews, stand with the oppressed—because we were the oppressed. This sentiment was often reinforced by my grandparents who arrived in America penniless, the Nazis hounding at their heels.

I took my role seriously, making it my mission to call for an immediate halt to the bulldozing of Palestinian homes in the West Bank and Gaza. I plunged into extensive research and armed myself with the knowledge to effectively champion a two-state solution—a belief I passionately held in high school and continue to endorse today.

Later, as a man in his 20s, it was only natural that I found myself firmly situated within the progressive left. I never once questioned my political home. Guided by my Jewish values, during the George Floyd tragedy and the racial reckoning that followed, I wholeheartedly embraced anti-racism initiatives. I read Ibram X. Kendi and Robin DiAngelo, and I even took on the role of facilitating international dialogues on collective sense-making and healing. I strove to be a good “white ally.” Truly, I did.

Then came a flexion point: During a 2021 Bay Area psychotherapy training, in a “processing session” around race, a woman vulnerably shared her firsthand experience with a horrific act of antisemitic hatred. To my astonishment, the two facilitators, both white women, chastised her—yes, chastised—stressing the session’s emphasis on anti-Black racism. This episode unveiled a disconcerting bias in this community that routinely minimized antisemitism, to the point it was no longer considered “legitimate” racism. The young Jewish woman who’d shared was cowed into silence. From within my depths, I could hear my grandfather’s groan from eternity: This, still, here?

At that moment, it became clear to me that “wokeness,” or whatever term we may use to describe the new progressive social justice ideology, didn’t seem fully compatible with the perspective I had developed in a family that was very liberal because of our lineage of Holocaust survivors.

Since then, I’ve struggled to find my political footing while maintaining a commitment to the pursuit of truth and justice. I started noticing the sinister shadow of postmodern progressivism everywhere: a seeming insistence on “pluralism” that, in practice, often lacks genuine embodiment and quickly devolves into its own form of dogmatic and reductive tribalism.

I began to feel as though I had been baited into an a priori virtuous worldview that, in a twisted way, sows more division than it does healing; more concerned, as it is, with retribution than reconciliation. That my Judaism was utterly swept away (even shadow-demonized) in the context of this conversation only left me more disillusioned.

Yet my affiliation with progressivism persisted. Say what one will about the oversimplifications and occasional insincerities of the progressive left, I told myself, their hearts were in the right place.

Then, two weeks ago, Hamas [with Mossad complicity] grotesquely murdered 1,400 Israeli citizens, including 270 at a pro-peace music festival, a gathering my friends and I would have joyously attended if we were in the Holy Land. While these events were deeply disturbing to me, and all fellow members of the diaspora, what was even more shocking was the response from segments of the online left back home. These are progressive groups that, ostensibly, should cherish all human life and abhor all wanton violence.

Instead, many celebrated—yes, celebrated—these attacks as a form of “anti-colonialist resistance.” Memes circulated, like the now infamous Chicago #BLM paratrooper, that quite literally glorified an unimaginable slaughtering. Student groups at Harvard decried Israel as “entirely responsible” for Hamas’ attack; groups at the University of Virginia went a step further in saying that “colonized people can resist occupation of their land by whatever means they deem necessary”; and groups at Tufts took the cake by praising Hamas’ ingenious creativity.

The straw that broke my proverbial “progressive” back occurred last Thursday, when students at a high school in the Bay Area, my home for the last 15 years, were seen chanting “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.” They marched in the hallways of a public school ringing the jihadist rallying call that implicitly calls for the erasure of the State of Israel. And all those who live within it.

Do these high schoolers, who are the same age I was when I debated on behalf of Palestine in Model U.N., grasp the underlying antisemitic implications of their words? Or might they simply be aligning with a far-left mindset that unreservedly and reductively supports the “oppressed”?

Zooming out, it has become clear to me, and devoid of the Israeli-Palestinian context, there’s a dark reality: Our Western culture is riddled with ambient antisemitism. Screeds by such celebrities as Kanye West testify to the fact. As Israel is pulled into a conflict governed by jihadist game theory—where civilians are intentionally used as shields so that dead children can be broadcast as propaganda puppets on social media—antisemitism has and surely will continue to intensify around the world. In London, antisemitic hate crimes have already risen by 1,350%. Watch it grow, worldwide.

Yet, it’s the latter question—how so many hypereducated students have steadfastly embraced far-left ideology—that raises my greatest concern for our future. This should not have to be said, but if you find yourself mourning some civilian deaths while celebrating any others, there’s an objective problem with your worldview. And you. The notion that one can distill our world’s most complex, historically dynamic, and challenging conflict into simplistic binaries is so utterly absurd that it clearly exposes the shortcomings of “woke” ideology. Or any dogmatism, for that matter.

Outside of lacking vital historical context, I’ve been aghast to learn that this branch of the progressive left does not seem to understand why such horrors were committed upon Israeli citizens. Unfortunately, there is an explanation beyond “colonial resistance”—radical jihadism. Granted, not all forms of jihadism are based on terrorism, and all Muslims are, of course, not jihadists. But make no mistake: The ones who are responsible for these brutal acts of murder, rape, and mutilation are radical jihadists. Groups like Hamas are, quite literally, death cults that are not consequentially distinct from Nazism—the death cult that systematically annihilated my grandparents’ entire extended family. The cult that the Allied West had no confusion about needing to destroy. Hamas’ stated intention is the eradication, first, of Israeli Jews—then all Jews everywhere. That is a genocidal agenda. The IDF, with all its flaws, which are numerous and sometimes deadly, avoids civilian Palestinian deaths whenever and however possible. That is the opposite of a genocidal agenda.

I truly wish it were as simple as reducing this conflict to an oppressor/oppressed dynamic. I am waiting, with horror, as Israel prepares for a ground invasion that will claim thousands of thoroughly innocent lives. I do not want any Gazan children to be collateral damage. My Jewish values, along with what I’ve learned advocating for Palestinian statehood, continue to affirm my belief in the importance of upholding the rights of Palestinian civilians.

Any ideology that “justifies” or minimizes the tragedy of civilian casualties is broken and perverse. That is not to say that all such casualties are avoidable. Reform Jews of my generation are unified in a desire for a two-state solution that provides Palestinians with safety, dignity, and rights. Over the past two weeks, I have heard no American Jew wish violence upon Gazans; I’ve witnessed many American so-called progressives who wish violence upon Jews. In response to raped teenagers and headless babies, a common leftist online refrain has been: “What did you think decolonization looked like?”

That’s not progressivism. That’s bloodthirst. (read more)


2023-11-22 a
COLLATERAL DAMAGE I

Protocol №5, paragraph 5:
... But it has paid us, though we have sacrificed many of our people.
Each victim on our side is worth in the sight of God a thousand GOYIM.



Israel Admits It Killed Some Of Its Own At Nova Music Festival

An Israeli police investigation into the Hamas attack on the Nova music festival near the Gaza border on October 7 revealed that an Israeli attack helicopter killed some of the attendees, Haaretz reported on Saturday. 

According to a police source, an investigation into the incident showed that an Israeli combat helicopter that arrived at the scene from the Ramat David base fired at Hamas fighters and other Palestinians who crossed through the border fence from Gaza into Israel, but also fired on some of the Israelis attending the music festival. According to the police, 364 people in total were killed there.

The Israeli military and rescue services previously claimed that 260 Israelis were killed at the festival, all by Hamas and Palestinians in a deliberate massacre. But this is the first acknowledgement that Israeli forces killed some of their own.

Previous reports in Israeli media revealed that Israeli forces killed Israeli civilians in Be’eri, a settlement also near the Gaza border. In that case, Hamas fighters were holding Israelis captive in homes. When the Israeli military arrived, it opened fire, including by firing tank shells, killing both Israeli captives and Hamas fighters.

Three of those killed in Be’eri by Israeli tank fire were 12-year-old Liel Hezroni, her brother Yanai, and their aunt Ayla. Israeli broadcaster Kan reported that Liel’s relatives held a farewell ceremony for her, rather than a burial ceremony, because her body could not be recovered from the house that collapsed on her and other Hamas captives after an Israeli tank fired two shells into it. 

A similar instance occurred in Sderot, where Hamas fighters had taken over the local police station, and were holding Israeli police captive inside. Both the Hamas fighters and Israeli police were killed when the Israeli army fired tank shells at the police station, killing everyone. Israeli forces then bulldozed the station.

It is therefore unclear how many of the Israelis who died on 7 October were killed by Hamas, whose fighters were seeking to take as many Israelis, both soldiers and civilians, captive back to Gaza as possible, and how many were killed by Israeli forces refusing to negotiate for the captives’ release.

Israel initially claimed Hamas and Palestinians killed 1,400 Israelis on October 7, including soldiers, police, and civilians, but later revised the count to 1,200. Israeli spokesperson Mark Regev acknowledged that 200 of the alleged victims were Hamas fighters or Palestinians whose bodies were burned so badly that Israeli authorities could not initially identify them and assumed them to be Israelis.

In an interview with MSNBC on Friday, he stated, "We originally said, in the atrocious Hamas attack upon our people on October 7th, we had the number at 1,400 casualties and now we’ve revised that down to 1,200 because we understood that we’d overestimated, we made a mistake. There were actually bodies that were so badly burnt we thought they were ours, in the end apparently they were Hamas terrorists."


Regarding the Nova festival,
 Haaretz reported as well that, "There is a growing assessment in the security establishment that the terrorists who carried out the massacre on October 7 did not know in advance about the Nova festival held near Kibbutz Re'im, and decided to come to the place after discovering that a mass event was taking place there." The Hamas fighters had initially intended to attack nearby settlements in what is known as the Gaza envelope.

According to Haaretz, senior security officials estimate that Hamas found out about the existence of the party using drones, and directed its fighters to the location using their communication system. In a video from a body camera of one Hamas fighter, "he is heard asking a captured Israeli for directions to reach the bad guys, even though he was in a different area." One of the findings that strengthens the assessment, according to the police and other security officials, is that the first Hamas fighters arrived at the Nova festival from the direction of road 232 and not from the direction of the Gaza border fence. (read more)


2023-11-21 b
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION IX

WHAT HATH THE FAKE PANDEMIC WROUGHT?
A diminution of the niceties,
a collapse of civility & civilization,
and an end of an era.


TO OUR VALUED SIGNATURE ROOM COMMUNITY

After over three decades of creating cherished memories, it is with profound sadness that we announce the permanent closure of the iconic Signature Room at the 95th, effective Thursday, September 28, 2023.

For over 30 years, we have had the privilege and honor of serving Chicagoans and visitors from all over the world. Together, we’ve marked countless life moments – from heartwarming engagements to milestone anniversaries.

Unfortunately, after the closure of our city and restaurant due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been faced with severe economic hardship and the challenges have been greater than we anticipated.

These factors, beyond our control, have left us with no choice but to close our doors.

Though this chapter ends, our gratitude for your unwavering support remains steadfast. Every meal served, every toast raised, and every memory made was possible because of you. We are eternally grateful for the trust you placed in us to be part of your special moments.

We appreciate your patience as we navigate this unexpected challenge. We will do our best to reach out and address all questions.

With heartfelt appreciation,
Rick Roman and Nick Pyknis

(source)


2023-11-21 a
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION VIII

“Jesus would get vaccinated.”


Hey, Woke Church, It’s Time to Wake Up!

I recently finished reading a very timely and hard-hitting book zeroing in on the American church called, Woke Jesus: The False Messiah Destroying Christianity by Lucas Miles. Much of what Miles writes about in Woke Jesus rings true with me and my experiences with what passes as a Christian response to the evil we see all around us and all over the world today.

The battle against evil is heating up, especially when we consider what [was allowed to have] happened just a few short weeks ago on October 7th in Israel. It’s hard to believe that, after that barbaric, sickening attack on innocent, unarmed citizens you will still find Christians saying, “Well, there’s good and bad on both sides.” These Christians seem to be hedging their bets, intent on not offending the wrong people perhaps, and are careful to remain lukewarm in their response to anything controversial. Even when the evil is over the top, they cannot find it in their hearts (or theology) to admit what’s staring all of us right in the face: What Hamas [and their enablers] did was pure evil.

If the church doesn’t wake up and stop being woke, this nation—and by extension, the world—is a goner.

One of the biggest takeaways from Woke Jesus is what Lucas Miles sees as the proper use of the word “Christian Nationalist.” Miles makes a solid case for applying the term to any church that goes along with the Far-Left agenda since it’s very apparent that the Far-Left is now solidly in charge of the federal (and many state) governing bodies. The churches in this category are obvious: As a rule of thumb, any church that flies the rainbow or BLM (or both) flags, and any church that looks the other way and doesn’t preach against the idea of children being urged to consider changing their immutable, biologically-determined sex—or the grooming of children—these churches support and advance those issues which are front-and-center on the national agenda.

Image by AI.

Want another example? Churches that obeyed orders from the government and coerced congregants into taking the (experimental) COVID-19 vaccine. Some, as Miles points out, used guilt-ladened arguments like, “Is your freedom in Christ more important than other people’s health?” Or (and this is my all-time favorite), “Jesus would get vaccinated.”

When I read that Jesus would get the jab, it recalled a couple verses I thought I might have read in some obscure translation of the New Testament. Verses like, “And Jesus could do no more miracles in that town because he was laid up for three days with a really bad flu.” And, “Jesus could not continue adding more Beatitudes to the list because of his persistent, hacking cough.” I’m going to take a wild guess here, but I believe that Jesus not only healed the sick and raised the dead and took away the sins of the world—but He was the healthiest human that ever walked planet Earth.

Fortunately, Lucas Miles isn’t the only Christian influencer eagerly trying to wake up a sleeping church. There are quite a few others who have boldly jumped into the fray over the past many years.

Jonathan Cahn, in his book, Return of the Gods, along with Eric Metaxas’s Letter to the American Church, are but two additional “voices crying in the wilderness” (or “watchmen on the wall,” if you will) who are trying desperately to shake Christians from their slumber. Their books and their “ministries” (Cahn in the pulpit every weekend at Beth Israel Worship Center in Wayne, New Jersey, and Metaxas every day on his nationally-syndicated radio program) address the warning that came from George Orwell in the late 1940s. Was Orwell observing we who inhabit the 2020s when he wrote this?

We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act.

So, where is the “revolutionary” spirit that was shown by the Apostles in the first century when they preached a countercultural perspective of love and human value against a strong-arm system of war prevalent in the overwhelming power of the Roman Empire? Or that same spirit when colonial Christians joined the fight for independence in the mid- to late-1700s? Where is that spirit in our current Church? Have church men and women of today become church mice?

For almost six years, I was the producer and sidekick on The Eric Metaxas Show, part of the Salem Radio lineup and TBN’s (Trinity Broadcasting Network’s) weekend programming. In the past, Eric has interviewed a variety of guests with varying viewpoints, from Morgan Freeman to Ron Howard to President Trump. As part of his eclectic mix, Eric has been constantly interviewing guests (most recently, Victor Davis Hanson, Naomi Wolf, Ben Stein, Roger Stone, and Dinesh D’Souza) alerting us to dangerous shifts in our culture, in our churches, and in our government.

Eric challenges his listeners to get off the couch and get involved—to be silent, to say nothing, is signaling both consent and compliance. And Eric advises that answering the call can be anything from voting; to poll-watching; to writing letters to the editors of local and national papers; to “speaking the truth” in love where you work, in your school, and even in your church when it is careening off its holy-roller rails.

During The Eric Metaxas Show’s weekly segment called “Ask Metaxas,” a listener wrote about a year ago to ask me, the sidekick, a question: “What’s the best part and the worst part of working with Eric?”

Of course, the best part was having the best seat in the house when it came to hearing Eric’s views on everything from politics, to culture, to living a godly life—and being able to chime in with a quick thought or quirky, funny observation here and there.

But the worst part was being made aware daily, as part of a news and entertainment network, that we were in a battle where not everyone who should be doing their part was doing it. I stated on-air that it was as if Eric and I were fighting in the Alamo. There were thousands of Santa Anna’s soldiers coming against fewer than 200 defenders of our old Spanish mission.

That was bad enough for Eric and me, but what made it worse was that it seemed as if half of the other fighters inside the Alamo were shooting at us—or they were chiding us for even fighting at all instead of being “good Christian men” who should show love to everybody.

But who can dispute the fact that we are now being overrun by evil? Isn’t now finally the time to wake up?

I would hope that all Americans, whether Christian or not, might pick up one of the books I highlighted here and seriously consider some of the practical suggestions they will find within their pages. The hour is certainly late. But if enough of us look for the opportunities, God might still bless America, and the victory can be won “with the Light from above.” (read more)


2023
-11-20 d
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION VII

WHEN PROTESTANT PASTORS LED THEIR LAMBS
TO THE CLOT SHOT SLAUGHTER



How The Federal Government Used Evangelical Leaders To Spread Covid Propaganda To Churches


In September, Wheaton College dean Ed Stetzer interviewed National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins on his podcast, “Church Leadership” about why Christians who want to obey Christ’s command to love their neighbors should get the Covid vaccine and avoid indulging in misinformation.

For those not familiar with Stetzer, he’s not just a religious liberal arts professor and this wasn’t just another dime-a-dozen pastorly podcast. To name just a few of his past and present titles in the evangelical world, Stetzer is also the executive director of the Billy Graham Center and the editor-in-chief of Outreach media group. He was previously an editor at Christianity Today and an executive director at LifeWay, one of the largest religious publishers in the world. That’s to say nothing of the dozen-plus books on missions and church planting he’s authored.

In short, when it comes to leveraging high evangelical offices to influence everyday Christians, arguably no one is better positioned than Ed Stetzer. You may not know his name, but if you’re a church-going Protestant, it’s almost guaranteed your pastor does.

Which is why, when Stetzer joined a line of renowned pastors and ministry leaders lending their platforms to Obama-appointee Collins, the collaboration was noteworthy.

During their discussion, Collins and Stetzer were hardly shy about the fact that they were asking ministers to act as the administration’s go-between with their congregants. “I want to exhort pastors once again to try to use your credibility with your flock to put forward the public health measures that we know can work," Collins said. Stetzer replied that he sometimes hears from ministers who don't feel comfortable preaching about covid vaccines, and he advises them, in those cases to simply promote the jab through social media.

(read more)


2023-11-20 c
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION VI

THE MALEFACTORS OF A CLOCKWORK ORANGE HAVE
BECOME THE SOCIOPATHS-OF-COLOR OF URBAN AMERICA

I first saw Kubrick's film auf Deutsch in a Berlin cinema.
That version is even more chilling than what Americans saw.



A Prophetic and Violent Masterpiece

Linguistically inventive, socially prescient, and philosophically profound, A Clockwork Orange comes close to being a work of genius.

When, as a medical student, I emerged from the cinema having watched Stanley Kubrick’s controversial film of A Clockwork Orange, I was astonished and horrified to see a group of young men outside dressed up as droogs, the story’s adolescent thugs who delighted in what they called “ultra-violence.”

The film had been controversial in Britain; its detractors, who wanted it banned, charged that it glamorized and thereby promoted violence. The young men dressed as droogs seemed to confirm the charge, though of course it is one thing to imitate a form of dress and quite another to imitate behavior. Still, even a merely sartorial identification with psychopathic violence shocked me, for it implied an imaginative sympathy with such violence; and seeing those young men outside the theater was my first intimation that art, literature, and ideas might have profound—and not necessarily favorable—social consequences. A year later, a group of young men raped a 17-year-old girl in Britain as they sang “Singing in the Rain,” a real-life replay of one of the film’s most notorious scenes.

The author of the book, Anthony Burgess, a polymath who once wrote five novels in a year, came to dislike this particular work intensely, not because of any practical harm to society that the film version of it might have caused but because he did not want to go down in literary history as the author of a book made famous, or notorious, by a movie. Irrespective of the value of his other work, however, A Clockwork Orange remains a novel of immense power. Linguistically inventive, socially prophetic, and philosophically profound, it comes very close to being a work of genius.

The story, set in the England of the near future (the book was published in 1962), is simple. The narrator, Alex, a precocious 15-year-old psychopath who has no feeling for others, leads a small gang in many acts of gratuitous, and much enjoyed, violence. Eventually, caught after a murder, he goes to prison, where—after another murder—the authorities offer to release him if he submits to a form of aversive conditioning against violence called the Ludovico Method. On his release, however, he attempts suicide by jumping out of a window, receiving a head injury that undoes his conditioning against violence. Once more he becomes the leader of a gang.

In the final chapter of the book’s British version, Alex again rejects violence, this time because he discovers within himself, spontaneously, a source of human tenderness that makes him want to settle down and have a baby. In the American edition—which Stanley Kubrick used—this last chapter is missing: Alex is not redeemed a second time, but returns, apparently once and for all, to the enjoyment of arbitrary and antisocial violence. In this instance, it is the British who were the optimists and the Americans the pessimists: Burgess’s American publisher, wanting the book to end unhappily, omitted the last chapter.

Burgess had been a schoolteacher (like William Golding, author of Lord of the Flies) and evidently sensed a stirring of revolt among the youth of his country and elsewhere in the West, a revolt with which—as a deeply unconventional man who felt himself to be an outsider however wealthy or famous he became, and who drank deep at the well of resentment as well as of spirituous liquors—he felt some sympathy and might even have helped in a small way to foment. And yet, as a man who was also deeply steeped in literary culture and tradition, he understood the importance of the shift of cultural authority from the old to the young and was very far from sanguine about its effects. He thought that the shift would lead to a hell on earth and the destruction of all that he valued.

He marks the separateness of his novel’s young protagonists from their elders by their adoption of a new argot, as well as a new form of dress. Vital for groups antagonistic toward the dominant society around them, such argots allow them to identify and communicate with insiders and exclude outsiders. Although I worked in a prison for 14 years, for example, I never came to understand the language that prisoners used as they shouted to one another across landings and between buildings. It was their means of resisting domination. In the French banlieues, les jeunes use an argot derived from words spelled and pronounced backward—and completely incomprehensible to educated speakers of French. People of Jamaican descent in Britain use a patois when they want not to be understood by anyone else. The connection between argot and criminal purposes has long been close, of course; and the importance that Burgess ascribes to the new argot in A Clockwork Orange suggests that he saw youthful revolt as an expression more of self-indulgence and criminality than of idealism—the latter, shallower view becoming orthodoxy among intellectuals not long after A Clockwork Orange appeared.

Burgess’s creation of a completely convincing new argot more or less ex nihilo is an extraordinary achievement. Nadsat (Russian for “teen”), as its speakers call it, is a mixture of anglicized Russian words—particularly provocative at the height of the cold war—and Cockney rhyming slang. As a linguistic invention, it is the equal of Orwell’s Newspeak. Alex, the narrator, though cold-blooded and self-centered, is intelligent and expresses himself with great force. A vocabulary that is entirely new and incomprehensible at the beginning of the book becomes so thoroughly familiar to the reader at the end that he forgets that he has ever had to learn its meaning: it seems completely natural after only a hundred pages. On the very first page, when Alex describes his gang’s intention to do a robbery, he says:

[T]here was no real need . . . of crasting [robbing] any more pretty polly [money] to tolchock [hit] some old veck [man] in an alley and viddy [see] him swim in his blood while we counted the takings and divided by four, nor to do the ultra-violent on some shivering starry [old] grey-haired ptitsa [woman] in a shop and go smecking [laughing] off with the till’s guts.

Of course, the lack of real “need” does not prevent Alex and his gang from robbing in a cruel and violent way, for their cruelty and violence is an end in itself, joyfully engaged in. Not for Burgess was the orthodox liberal view that economic deprivation and lack of opportunity cause crime.

The gang’s solipsistic and dehumanizing argot reflects this cold-bloodedness. Sexual intercourse, for example, becomes “the old in-out-in-out,” a term without reference to the other participant, who is merely an object. The gang attacks a schoolteacher carrying books home from the library, for no reason other than a free-floating malevolence and joy in cruelty:

Pete held his rookers [hands] and Georgie sort of hooked his rot [mouth] wide open for him and Dim yanked out his false zoobies [teeth], upper and lower. He threw these down on the pavement and then I treated them to the old boot-crush, though they were hard bastards like. . . . The old veck [man] began to make sort of chumbling shooms [sounds]—“wuf waf wof”—so Georgie let go of holding his goobers [jaws] apart and just let him have one in the toothless rot with his ringy fist, and that made the old veck start moaning a lot then, then out comes the blood, my brothers, real beautiful.

I doubt that a lack of feeling for others has ever been expressed more powerfully.

Burgess intuited with almost prophetic acuity both the nature and characteristics of youth culture when left to its own devices, and the kind of society that might result when that culture became predominant. For example, adults grow afraid of the young and defer to them, something that has certainly come to pass in Britain, where adults now routinely look away as youngsters commit antisocial acts in public, for fear of being knifed if they do otherwise, and mothers anxiously and deferentially ask their petulant five-year-old children what they would like to eat, in the hope of averting tantrums. The result is that adolescents and young men take any refusal of a request as lèse-majesté, a challenge to the integrity of their ego. When I refused to prescribe medicine that young men wanted but that I thought they did not need, they would sometimes answer in aggrieved disbelief, “No? What do you mean, no?” It was not a familiar concept. And in a sense, my refusal was pointless, insofar as any such young man would soon enough find a doctor whom he could intimidate into prescribing what he wanted. Burgess would not have been surprised by this state of affairs: he saw it coming.

When Alex and his gang enter a pub—they are underage, but no one dares challenge them—they spread fear by their mere presence.

Now we were the very good malchicks [boys], smiling good evensong to one and all, though these wrinkled old lighters [people] started to get all shook, their veiny old rookers all trembling round their glasses, and making the suds [drink] spill on the table. “Leave us be, lads,” said one of them, her face all mappy with being a thousand years old, “we’re only poor old women.”

Intimidation of the aged and contempt for age itself are an essential part of the youth culture: no wonder aging rock stars are eternal adolescents, wrinkled and arthritic but trapped in the poses of youth. Age for them means nothing but indignity.

Alex’s parents (one of the things Burgess didn’t foresee is the rise of the single-parent family) are afraid of him. He comes home late and plays his music very loud, but “Pee and em [Father and Mother] . . . had learnt now not to knock on the wall with complaints of what they called noise. I had taught them. Now they would take sleep-pills.” When Alex’s father wants to know what he does at night—Alex is only 15—he is apologetic and deferential: “ ‘Not that I want to pry, son, but where exactly is it you go to work of evenings?’ . . . My dad was like humble mumble chumble. ‘Sorry, son,’ he said. ‘But I get worried sometimes.’ ”

When in a symbolic reversal of the direction of authority Alex offers his father some money (robbed, of course) so that he can buy himself a drink in the pub, his father says: “Thanks, son. . . . But we don’t go out much now. We daren’t go out much, the streets being what they are. Young hooligans and so on. Still, thanks.”

In 1962, the idea that the young would someday impose upon old people in Britain a de facto after-dark curfew was still unimaginable, but Burgess, seeing the cloud no bigger than a man’s hand on the horizon, imagined that outcome very vividly. With a prophet’s imagination, he saw what would happen when the cloud grew until it covered the sky.

With like prescience, Burgess foresaw many other aspects of the youth culture to come: the importance that mind-altering drugs and an industrialized pop music would play in it, for example. (Burgess did not, however, suggest that high culture was necessarily ennobling in itself. Alex, much superior in intelligence to his followers, is a devotee of classical music, listening to which, however, increases his urge to commit violence. No doubt Burgess had in mind those Nazis who could listen with emotion to Schubert lieder after a hard day’s genocide.)

Burgess foresaw the importance that the youth culture would attach to sexual precocity and a kind of disabused knowingness. In a remarkable rape scene, Alex meets two ten-year-old girls who, like him, are skipping school, in a record shop, where they are listening to pop music with suggestive titles such as “Night after Day after Night.”

They saw themselves, you could see, as real grown-up devotchkas [girls] already, what with the old hipswing when they saw your Faithful Narrator, brothers, and padded groodies [breasts] and red all ploshed on their goobers [lips]. . . . [T]hey viddied [saw] themselves as real sophistoes. . . . They had the same ideas or lack of, and the same colour hair—a like dyed strawy. Well, they would grow up real today. . . . No school this afterlunch, but education certain, Alex as teacher.

Their education that afternoon consists of repeated rape by an already experienced 15-year-old.

It would not have surprised Burgess that magazines for ten- or 11-year-old girls are now full of advice about how to make themselves sexually attractive, that girls of six or seven are dressed by their single mothers in costumes redolent of prostitution, or that there has been a compression of generations, so that friendships are possible between 14- and 26-year-olds. The precocity necessary to avoid humiliation by peers prevents young people from maturing further and leaves them in a state of petrified adolescence. Persuaded that they already know all that is necessary, they are disabused about everything, for fear of appearing naive. With no deeper interests, they are prey to gusts of hysterical and childish enthusiasm; only increasingly extreme sensation can arouse them from their mental torpor. Hence the epidemic of self-destructiveness that has followed in the wake of the youth culture.

The world in which youth culture predominates and precocity is the highest achievement is one in which all tenderness is absent. When Alex and his gang attack the teacher, they find a letter in his pocket, which one of them reads out derisively: “My darling one . . . I shall be thinking of you while you are away and hope you will remember to wrap up warm when you go out at night.”

Such simple and heartfelt affection and concern for another person are extinct in the world of Alex and his droogs. Alex is incapable of putting himself in the place of anyone else, of “changing places in fancy with the sufferer,” as Adam Smith puts it. Self-absorbed, he is self-pitying but has no pity for others. When he is arrested after the brutal murder of an old woman, he calls the policemen who have arrested him “bullies” and accuses them when they laugh at him of “the heighth of . . . callousness.” Alex is quite incapable of connecting his own savage behavior with the words that he applies to the police. I was reminded of a case of murder in which I gave testimony recently: the young murderer kicked his girlfriend’s head so hard that he broke her jaw in many places and forced her tongue through the back of her throat, and her stomach filled with blood—and a neighbor heard him laugh as he kicked. A policeman, after listening to his lies and evasions for two days, accused him of having no remorse for his deed. “You ’ave no feelings,” the murderer rejoined. “I pity your poor wife”—just like Alex in A Clockwork Orange, but without the intelligence and the taste for classical music.

In the world of Alex and his droogs, all relations with other human beings are instrumental means to a selfish, brutal, hedonistic end. And this is the world that so many of my patients now inhabit, a world in which perhaps a third of the British population lives. It is also the world in which having a baby is the fulfillment of a personal human right, and nothing else.

But Burgess was not merely a social and cultural prophet. A Clockwork Orange grapples as well with the question of the origin and nature of good and evil. The Ludovico Method that Alex undergoes in prison as a means of turning him into a model citizen in exchange for his release is in essence a form of conditioning. Injected with a drug that induces nausea, Alex must then watch films of the kind of violence that he himself committed, his head and eyelids held so that he cannot escape the images by looking away from them—all this to the piped-in accompaniment of the classical music that he loves. Before long, such violence, either in imagery or in reality, as well as the sound of classical music, causes him nausea and vomiting even without the injection, as a conditioned response. Alex learns to turn the other cheek, as a Christian should: when he is insulted, threatened, or even struck, he does not retaliate. After the treatment—at least, until he suffers his head injury—he can do no other.

Two scientists, Drs. Branom and Brodsky, are in charge of the “treatment.” The minister of the interior, responsible for cutting crime in a society now besieged by the youth culture, says: “The Government cannot be concerned any longer with outmoded penological theories . . . . Common criminals . . . can best be dealt with on a purely curative basis. Kill the criminal reflex, that’s all.” In other words, a criminal or violent act is, in essence, no different from the act of a rat in a cage, who presses a lever in order to obtain a pellet of food. If you shock the rat with electricity when it presses the lever instead of rewarding it with food, it will soon cease to press the lever. Criminality can be dealt with, or “cured,” in the same way.

At the time that Burgess wrote A Clockwork Orange, doctors were trying to “cure” homosexuals by injecting them with apomorphine, a nausea-inducing drug, while showing them pictures of male nudes. And overwhelmingly, the dominant school of psychology worldwide at the time was the behaviorism of Harvard prof B. F. Skinner. His was what one might call a “black box” psychology: scientists measured the stimulus and the response but exhibited no interest whatsoever in what happened between the two, as being intrinsically immeasurable and therefore unknowable. While Skinner might have quibbled about the details of the Ludovico Method (for example, that Alex got the injection at the wrong time in relation to the violent films that he had to watch), he would not have rejected its scientific—or rather scientistic—philosophy.

In 1971, the very year in which the Kubrick film of A Clockwork Orange was released, Skinner published a book entitled Beyond Freedom and Dignity. He sneered at the possibility that reflection upon our own personal experience and on history might be a valuable source of guidance to us in our attempts to govern our lives. “What we need,” he wrote, “is a technology of behavior.” Fortunately, one was at hand. “A technology of operant behavior is . . . already well advanced, and it may prove commensurate with our problems.” As he put it, “[a] scientific analysis shifts the credit as well as the blame [for a man’s behavior] to the environment.” What goes on in a man’s mind is quite irrelevant; indeed, “mind,” says Skinner, is “an explanatory fiction.”

For Skinner, being good is behaving well; and whether a man behaves well or badly depends solely upon the schedule of reinforcement that he has experienced in the past, not upon anything that goes on in his mind. It follows that there is no new situation in a man’s life that requires conscious reflection if he is to resolve the dilemma or make the choices that the new situation poses: for everything is merely a replay of the past, generalized to meet the new situation.

The Ludovico Method, then, was not a far-fetched invention of Burgess’s but a simplified version—perhaps a reductio ad absurdum, or ad nauseam—of the technique for solving all human problems that the dominant school of psychology at the time suggested. Burgess was a lapsed Catholic, but he remained deeply influenced by Catholic thought throughout his life. The Skinnerian view of man appalled him. He thought that a human being whose behavior was simply the expression of conditioned responses was not fully human but an automaton. If he did the right thing merely in the way that Pavlov’s dog salivated at the sound of a bell, he could not be a good man: indeed, if all his behavior was determined in the same way, he was hardly a man at all. A good man, in Burgess’s view, had to have the ability to do evil as well as good, an ability that he would voluntarily restrain, at whatever disadvantage to himself.

Being a novelist rather than an essayist, however, and a man of many equivocations, Burgess put these thoughts in A Clockwork Orange into the mouth of a ridiculous figure, the prison chaplain, who objects to the Ludovico Method—but not enough to resign his position, for he is eager to advance in what Alex calls “Prison religion.” Burgess puts the defense of the traditional view of morality as requiring the exercise of free will—the view that there is no good act without the possibility of a bad one—into the mouth of a careerist.

The two endings of A Clockwork Orange—the one that Burgess himself wrote and the truncated one that his American publisher wanted and that Kubrick used for his film—have very different meanings.

According to the American-Kubrick version, Alex resumes his life as violent gang leader after his head injury undoes the influence of the Ludovico Method. He returns to what he was before, once more able to listen to classical music (Beethoven’s Ninth) and fantasize violence without any conditioned nausea:

Oh, it was gorgeosity and yumyumyum. When it came to the Scherzo I could viddy myself very clear running and running on like very light and mysterious nogas [feet], carving the whole litso [face] of the creeching [screaming] world with my cut-throat britva [razor]. And there was the slow movement and the lovely last singing movement still to come. I was cured all right.

Kubrick even suggests that this is a happy outcome: better an authentic psychopath than a conditioned, and therefore inauthentic, goody-goody. Authenticity and self-direction are thus made to be the highest goods, regardless of how they are expressed. And this, at least in Britain, has become a prevailing orthodoxy among the young. If, as I have done, you ask the aggressive young drunks who congregate by the thousand in every British town or city on a Saturday night why they do so, or British soccer fans why they conduct themselves so menacingly, they will reply that they are expressing themselves, as if there were nothing further to be said on the matter.

The full, British version of A Clockwork Orange ends very differently. Alex begins to lose his taste for violence spontaneously, when he sees a happy, normal couple in a café, one of whom is a former associate of his. Thereafter, Alex begins to imagine a different life for himself and to fantasize a life that includes tenderness:

There was Your Humble Narrator Alex coming home from work to a good hot plate of dinner, and there was this ptitsa [girl] all welcoming and greeting like loving. . . . I had this sudden very strong idea that if I walked into the room next to this room where the fire was burning away and my hot dinner laid on the table, there I should find what I really wanted. . . . For in that other room in a cot was laying gurgling goo goo goo my son. . . . I knew what was happening, O my brothers. I was like growing up.

Burgess obviously prefers a reformation that comes spontaneously from within, as it does in the last chapter, to one that comes from without, by application of the Ludovico Method. Here he would agree with Kubrick—an internal reformation is more authentic, and thus better in itself because a true expression of the individual. Perhaps Burgess also believes that such an internal reformation is likely to go deeper and be less susceptible to sudden reversal than reformation brought from outside.

Burgess also suggests the somewhat comforting message, at odds with all that has gone before, that Alex’s violence is nothing new in the world and that the transformation of immature, violent, and solipsistic young men into mature, peaceful, and considerate older men will continue forever, as it has done in the past, because deep inside there is a well of goodness, man having been born with original virtue rather than original sin (this is the Pelagian heresy, to which Burgess admitted that he was attracted). There is a never-ending cycle:

[Y]outh is only being in a way like it might be an animal. No, it is not just like being an animal so much as being like one of these malenky [small] toys you viddy being sold in the streets, like little chellovecks [men] made out of tin and with a spring inside and then a winding handle on the outside and you wind it up grrr grrr grrr and off it itties [goes], like walking, O my brothers. But it itties in a straight line and bangs straight into things bang bang and it cannot help what it is doing. Being young is like being like one of these malenky machines.

My son, my son. When I had my son I would explain all that to him when he was starry [old] enough to like understand. But then I knew he would not understand or would not want to understand at all and would do all the veshches [things] I had done . . . and I would not be able to really stop him. And nor would he be able to stop his own son, brothers. And so it would itty on to like the end of the world.

And this, surely, is partly right. Four centuries ago, Shakespeare wrote:

I would there were no age between sixteen and three-and-twenty, or that youth would sleep out the rest; for there is nothing in the between but getting wenches with child, wronging the ancientry, stealing, fighting.

And certainly it is true that criminality, statistically speaking, is an activity of the young and that there are few prisoners in the prison in which I worked who had been incarcerated for a crime committed after age 35. There seems to be a biological dimension to common-or-garden wrongdoing.

But a quietistic message—cheerful insofar as it implies that violence among young men is but a passing phase of their life and that the current era is no worse in this respect than any past age, and pessimistic in the sense that a reduction of the overall level of violence is impossible—is greatly at odds with the socially prophetic aspect of the book, which repeatedly warns that the coming new youth culture, shallow and worthless, will be unprecedentedly violent and antisocial. And of Britain, at least, Burgess was certainly right. He extrapolated from what he saw in the prime manifestation of the emerging youth culture, pop music, to a future in which self-control had shrunk to vanishing, and he realized that the result could only be a Hobbesian world, in which personal and childish whim was the only authority to guide action. Like all prophets, he extrapolated to the nth degree; but a brief residence in a British slum should persuade anyone that he was not altogether wide of the mark.

A Clockwork Orange is not completely coherent. If youth is violent because the young are like “malenky machines” who cannot help themselves, what becomes of the free will that Burgess otherwise saw as the precondition of morality? Do people grow into free will from a state of automatism, and, if so, how and when? And if violence is only a passing phase, why should the youth of one age be much more violent than the youth of another? How do we achieve goodness, both on an individual and social level, without resort to the crude behaviorism of the Ludovico Method or any other form of cruelty? Can we bypass consciousness and reflection in our struggle to behave well?

There are no schematic answers in the book. One cannot condemn a novel of 150 pages for failing to answer some of the most difficult and puzzling questions of human existence, but one can praise it for raising them in a peculiarly profound manner and forcing us to think about them. To have combined this with acute social prophecy (to say nothing of entertainment) is genius. (read more)


2023-11-20 b
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION V

TARGET HAS A CORPORATE DEATH WISH.
The spay & neuter TRANS CULT is a tiny faction.

Is their buying power sufficient to overcome the boycott from the moral majority
that opposes castration, mastectomies, penis inversions
and cross-sex hormones for preteens and teens? 



2023-11-20 a
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION IV

GEORGIA ELECTORAL FRAUD UPDATE

Keep an eye on this story. Three eye-witnesses, under oath, with same story about allegedly fake ballots. An alleged room full of proof (the actual ballots) kept locked for three years. Lawyers for the defense suddenly bailing out. Lower court dawdling, but ordered by higher court to unlock the door.
...

*
*
*

Hard to overstate how this trial will impact Jack Smith’s election/J6 case in DC. On same day draft of jury questionnaire is due for DC trial, a bench trial in GA will begin that could unravel a central piece of Smith’s indictment and role of one of his star witnesses—Brad Raffensberger.


*

In an earlier October 11, 2020 ruling, Judge Totenberg stated there was “demonstrable evidence” that the implementation of Dominion’s systems by the State of Georgia places voters at an “imminent risk of deprivation of their fundamental right to cast an effective vote,” which the judge defined simply as a “vote that is accurately counted.” Totenberg also stated in her ruling that a BMD printout “is not trustworthy” and the application of a risk-limiting-audit to an election that used BMD printouts “does not yield a true risk-limiting audit.” Election security expert J. Alex Halderman noted the same issues in a sworn declaration, telling the court, “if voters do not reliably detect when their paper ballots are wrong, no amount of post-election auditing can detect or correct the problem.” None of this kept Secretary of State Raffensperger from announcing the results of the audit as certain: “Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced the results of the Risk Limiting Audit of Georgia’s presidential contest, which upheld and reaffirmed the original outcome produced by the machine tally of votes cast. Due to the tight margin of the race and the principles of risk-limiting audits, this audit was a full manual tally of all votes cast. The audit confirmed that the original machine count accurately portrayed the winner of the election.” Raffensperger’s statement is in direct conflict with that of Totenberg, who noted that “there is no audit remedy that can confirm the reliability and accuracy of the BMD system, as Dr. Stark has stressed.”


*
*

See also: https://rumble.com/vxr5x3-suspected-election-day-fraud-in-fulton-county-november-2020.html

*
*

2023-11-19 c
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION III

THE BOLSHEVIKS CANNOT
AFFORD TO LOSE IN 2024.
They will resort to their usual tricks: censorship, propaganda,
lawfare and astronomical levels of electoral fraud.



2023-11-19 b
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION II

THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA IS NOT NEW.
The spike protein mRNA clot shots are just
the latest method used by the Malthusians.



2023-11-19 a
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION I

WHAT WERE NEWSPAPER EDITORIAL BOARDS DOING
WHEN GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS STOPPED USING PHONICS
TO TEACH READING IN KINDERGARTEN & FIRST GRADE?
NOTHING. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING BEYOND LAMENTING
THAT "JOHNNY CAN'T READ." 



2023
-11-18 e
THE REAL REASON V

ARE BLUE STATES LEGALIZING RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA
TO BENEFIT CARTELS OR TO DESTROY FAMILIES
OR TO INCREASE TAX RECEIPTS?



*
See also: https://scitechdaily.com/high-risk-extensive-study-links-cannabis-use-disorder-to-bipolar-and-depression/


2023-11-18 d
THE REAL REASON IV

IS THE HOST OF READING RAINBOW ON PBS
A SODOMITE OR A GROOMER OR
BOTH A SODOMITE & GROOMER?


*
*
*
See also:
LeVar Burton Threatened ‘Physical Violence’ Against Moms for Liberty at Book Ceremony
https://legalinsurrection.com/2023/11/levar-burton-threatened-physical-violence-against-moms-for-liberty-at-book-ceremony/


2023-11-18 c
THE REAL REASON III

THOUGH THEY CALL MUSK AN ANTISEMITE (HE ISN'T.)
THEY WANT TO DESTROY HIM BECAUSE TWITTER
ALLOWS A BIT OF FREE SPEECH



*
*
*

*

*

*

2023-11-18 b
THE REAL REASON II

THE US HAS NO MORE 155MM SHELLS TO EXPORT.
So America is not sending any more to Israel,
which was then sending them to the Ukraine.



2023-11-18 a
THE REAL REASON I

The small group of people who actually run the world hate
TikTok because their Zionist agendas
& narratives are not supported.



We have a major Tiktok problem.

Leaked audio of ADL chief executive Jonathan Greenblatt freaking out because global youth aren't buying Israel's propaganda anymore. #Gaza pic.twitter.com/tzU02bSXAm

— Sharmine Narwani (@snarwani) November 16, 2023


*
See also: https://thenewamerican.com/world-news/middle-east/israel-losing-pr-war-opposition-leader-says-netanyahu-must-go/


______________________

Permission is hereby granted to any and all to copy and paste any entry on this page and convey it electronically along with its URL, http://www.usaapay.com/comm.html

______________________


2023 ARCHIVE

January 1 - 6

January 7 - 13

January 14 - 16

January 17 - 22

January 23 - 29

January 30 - 31

February 2 - 8

February 9 - 16

February 17 - 21

February 22 - 28
March 1 - 4

March 5 - 9

March 10 - 13

March 14 - 18

March 19 - 23

March 24 - 28

March 29 - 31

April 1 - 4

April 5 - 11

April 12 - 17

April 18 - 24

April 26 - 30
May 1 - 8

May 9 - 17

May 21 - 26

May 27 - 31
 
June 1 - 5

June 6 - 14

June 15 - 24

June 25 - 30
July 1 - 12

July 13 - 29

July 30 - 31
August 1 - 13

August 14 - 19

August 20 - 26

August 27 - 31
September 1 - 10

September 11 - 16

September 17 - 27

September 28 - 30

October 1 - 8

October 9 - 15

October 16 - 23

October 24 - 31
November 1 - 11

November 12 - 17

December


2022 ARCHIVE

January 4 - 9

January 10 - 16

January 18 - 22

January 23 - 29

January 30 - 31

February 1 - 6

February 7 - 10

February 11 - 15

February 16 - 20

February 22 - 28
March 1 - 7

March 8 - 17

March 18 - 25

March 26 - 31
April 1 - 8

April 9 - 17

April 18 - 25

April 26 - 30

May 1 - 9

May 10 - 14

May 15 - 23

May 24 - 31
 
June 1 - 10

June 11 - 17

June 18 - 26

June 27 - 30
July 1 - 10

July 11 - 17

July 18 - 23

July 24 - 29

July 30 - 31

August 1 - 10

August 11 - 18

August 19 - 23

August 24 - 31
September 1 - 9

September 10 - 17

September 18 - 25

September 26 - 30

October 1 - 9

October 10 - 17

October 18 - 27

October 28 - 31

November 1 - 6

November 7 - 13

November 14 - 18

November 19 - 24

November 26 - 30

December 1 - 7

December 8 - 15

December 16 - 23

December 24 - 31


2021 ARCHIVE


January 1 - 6

January 7 - 13

January 14 - 20

January 21 - 24

January 25 - 28

January 29 - 31

February 1 - 4

February 5 - 10

February 11 - 21

February 22 - 24

February 25 - 28
March 1 - 9

March 10 - 17

March 18 - 23

March 24 - 31
April 1 - 8

April 9 - 14

April 15 - 18

April 19 - 24

April 25 - 30

May 1 - 5

May 6 - 10

May 11 - 15

May 16 - 22

May 23 - 26

May 27 - 29

May 30 - 31
 
June 1 - 5

June 6 - 8

June 9 - 12

June 13 - 19

June 20 - 24

June 25 - 30
July 1 - 6

July 7 - 10

July 11 - 17

July 18 - 23

July 24 - 28

July 29 - 31
August 1 - 5

August 6 - 8

August 9 - 14

August 15 - 18

August 19 - 23

August 24 - 28

August 29 - 31
September 1 - 4

September 5 - 9

September 10 - 16

September 17 - 21

September 22 - 27

September 28 - 30

October 1 - 5

October 6 - 9

October 10 - 14

October 15 - 20

October 21 - 27

October 28 - 31

November 1 - 6

November 7 - 10

November 11 - 14

November 15 - 20

November 21 - 25

November 26 - 30
December 1 - 4

December 5 - 9

December 10 - 13

December 14 - 18

December 19 - 26

December 27 - 31

2020 ARCHIVE

January
February March
April 1 - 15

April 16- 30

May 1 - 15

May 16- 31
 
June 1 - 15

June 16- 30
July 1 - 15

July 16- 31
Aug 1 - 15

Aug 16 - 31
September 1 - 15

September 16 - 30
October 1 - 15

October 16 - 23

Ocober 24 - 31
November 1 - 8

November 9 - 15

November 16 - 21

November 22 - 30
December 1 - 7

December 8 - 12

December 13 - 16

December 17 - 20

December 21 - 27

December 28 - 31

-0-
...
 News and facts for those sick and tired of the National Propaganda Radio version of reality.


- Unlike all the legacy media, our editorial offices are not in Langley, Virginia.


- You won't catch us fiddling while Western Civilization burns.


-
Close the windows so you don't hear the mockingbird outside, grab a beer, and see what the hell is going on as we witness the controlled demolition of our society.


- The truth usually comes from one source. It comes quietly, with no heralds. Untruths come from multiple sources, in unison, and incessantly.


- The loudest partisans belong to the smallest parties. The media exaggerate their size and influence.


THE ARCHIVE PAGE
.
No Thanks
If you let them redefine words, they will control language.
If you let them control language, they will control thoughts.
If you let them control thoughts, they will control you. They will own you.

© 2020 - 2021 - thenotimes.com - All Rights Reserved