welcome to usaapay.com

2020-

2020-08-31 c
Society for the Elimination of Risk - for Bedwetters, Covidiots, Democrats, Safety Fetishists, and Assorted Wusses

A newsletter from the Society for the Elimination of Risk

‘If you must swim, always wear a life vest, face mask and snorkel’

Fall Newsletter

Our Director, Eustace Stockstill, introduces the Fall issue.

Dear fellow Soterians,

I have tremendous news to share with you. Our membership drive during the last six months has been successful beyond our most imprudent hopes! Even now we can hardly believe it. The number of our members has increased by a power of seven! That’s a power, not a multiplier: we have doubled our membership seven times since March!

I’m sure old members will remember the hurtful article a year ago in the Daily Gaslighter that dismissed us as cranks, mocking us as nothing but a tiny group of English eccentrics. Now we are having the laugh on them! Now we have 10 times more members than they have subscribers, and our influence is growing daily.

Of course we’ve been given a tremendous boost by the Great COVID Plague. But I can report without undue modesty that we in the Society’s leadership have taken full advantage of this gift from our tutelary deity, Hygeia. The avalanche of new membership fees has allowed us greatly to expand our media and political activities and to conduct, for the first time, scientific surveys of public opinion on risk avoidance.

As Bill Matrix reports elsewhere in this issue, our new survey, Public Risk Sensitivity (PRS), has shown immense improvement in public awareness of risk in the last six months. For our new members, let me explain that the ‘old normal,’ pre-COVID risk sensitivity indicated that most people, upwards of 90 percent, would only alter their behavior if their risk of an adverse outcome rose into the range of 1/1000 to 1/100 per year. We call that millenary risk sensitivity.

The survey of 4,500 adults conducted on July 27-31 by Bill’s team showed that fully two-thirds of the population — and the most highly-educated portion at that — now falls into the decemillenary (1/1000-10,000) range. Fully half again of the decemillenaries are also centemillenaries (1/10,000-1/100,000). Lockdown is working on the mind as well as the body!

Furthermore, our survey shows that, thanks to responsible selection of data by the press, the number of people who can distinguish absolute from relative risk has actually declined! Our efforts to raise awareness have led the British to believe that 7 percent of Britons have died from coronavirus. Americans are even more aware, estimating that the virus has killed 9 percent of their compatriots. Even if these judgments are faulty in a merely arithmetical sense, they surely serve the higher truth to which our Society is dedicated, that no risk is really tolerable. Our Society can congratulate itself for its part in creating this new and better form of rational ignorance. From now on, we and our cooperating scientists will get to decide what it is rational not to know. Who says that innumeracy can’t benefit society?

In ‘Keeping up Appearances: A Report from our Media Department’, Wilma Keening describes how lockdowns in the USA have been sustained by the political situation during this election year. We have encouraged our media partners to believe that rigorous measures will undermine the re-election prospects of Donald Trump. That phrase ‘Trump’s Katrina’ has worked magic!

‘A Catch-22 in COVID-19’ by Vilfredo Vigliacco discusses the worrying tendency of risk-sensitivity to decrease as economic life contracts. The sacrifices necessary for risk-free life have the unfortunate effect of reducing quality of life and personal income, especially at the bottom of society. Poverty and unemployment, in turn, have the unfortunate effect of making the working classes less risk-sensitive. Fortunately, the indigent don’t make the decisions in our societies, but they do vote. Vilfredo offers some strategies for keeping the newly impoverished from losing their commitment to lockdowns.

In ‘The costs of risk-free life,’ Wilbur Boltlatch describes the enormous success our political action group has had in transferring the costs of risk-free life to the government. As all economists know, if you subsidize something, you get more of it, and we can’t have too little risk-avoidance.

Finally, a response to you, dear readers! Many of our new members have expressed surprise and delight at the extraordinary array of resources SER offers to the risk-sensitive community. At the same time, many say they are intimidated by the enormous length and technical detail of our reports. So beginning with this newsletter, I will be including at the end of my letter a few simple FAQs for those of you too busy Zooming to study the full reports. It should be a sobering thought for Society members that all of the activities described below carry more risk of death for school-age children than COVID-19.

Be well, and keep your distance!

[signed in his absence]

Eustace Stockstill

Director and Supreme Soterian

______________________

Permission is hereby granted to any and all to copy and paste any entry on this page and convey it electronically along with its URL,
______________________